Somatek
Well-Known Member
Those kinds of personal opinions have little value to me, by all means live by your own values but as I've said many times the genes are the facts I care about. Is any company ethical when their selling seeds for $5+ when they cost a fraction of a penny to produce? It's a seedy business no matter how you look at it...I prefer to support ethical businesses.
Interesting interpretation to deflect from the point which is whether his seeds are as good as other seeds on the market. From my experience they are, which as I've stated are the only facts I care about. None of your criticisms are facts but your interpretation of his actions. Considering none of them are based on direct experience growing his seeds as you've decided his "slimy, victim behaviour speaks for itself", so your opinions are subjective based on your experience and values without being based on his genetics.You'll note I said nothing about any seeds he makes or allegations about star pupil or any other strains he's marketed. That's because all of the slimy, victim behavior speaks for itself--before ever taking seeds into account. Further, the fact that you refer to everything as opinion (including the things that are easily proven to be fact) tells me that you're not interested in discussion--only in proving your opinion correct.
Seems like a convenient way to dismiss my points by holding MMS to a different standard then the rest of the companies. Read the forums long enough and you'll hear the same complaints about all the companies which is why I ignore opinions from people who haven't grown the seeds they're complaining about.Your what-about-ism speaks volumes.