as long as he never sees the inside of the White House again, i can live with it.Donnie has enough cash and clout to stall until his death. I don’t think he will ever see a cell.
I believe the intent was to prevent something like what we have now with foreign interference and actors within the government. The idea being that a foreign born person could still hold loyalty to whatever country they came from and would sell out America if they got into power. That reasoning doesn't age well.The last two requirements make sense but the first one is bullshit. Particularly from a country that owes much of its success to immigration.
I don’t know of any other democratic country that has this stipulation.
The constitution was written by immigrants.So we let foreigners and criminals sit as President?
Wtf's wrong w/this hallowed constitution we have?
Dumbya should be given death penalty for what he's done.
He was worse than Trump...kinda.
property bonds...trump tower, bedminster, and Mar-a-lardo ought to be enough to deter him from exiting, stage left....
...and criminals. sheeitThe constitution was written by immigrants.
Gotti was a lot smarter and more careful than Donald! I wonder did they wiretap Trump yet? Or is there no need to, the feds have more than enough to get a tap and have Donald's golf cart wired for sound, like Rudi did with Gotti. Rudy was running those cases, so it explains the fuckups.He's indicted not convicted. John Gotti was acquitted three times before he was finally convicted. That's how the term Teflon Don came to be.
The United States completely changed the way government functions in 1776 at that time every other country was a dictatorship. Maybe its time for a reform. Instead of holding these corporate cucks who are getting huge amounts of money from pharmaceutical and oil lobbyists up on a pedestal. How about we only elect those who arent getting kickbacks from government contracts? IDK political tensions has caused people to see everyone as a extremist because they have a view different then their own, and thats not a great table to try and debate a solution at imho. People need to see that they arent much different from those in another party. Yes we all have different ideas but the whole concept of compromise is gone its either do this or were going to limit the things you do. To me this is foreshadowing of a social credit score.what is your solution/viable candidate?
[/Q
and how would you suggest we achieve this worthy goal? I'll be second in line, once you get the mechanics worked out.How about we only elect those who arent getting kickbacks from government contracts?
Was in the other redundant Trump indictment thread I think.Sorry, I must've misread. Could you say which was the one you posted, please?
well, they are, is the problem...some people want minorities and women to not have a voice, a choice in their own lives, they fear lgbtq people, and immigrants, and villainize them, make them targets in cultural wars that only exist because they lie to foolish people who believe them...Those people are different...much different.People need to see that they arent much different from those in another party.
How hard is it to implement a policy where any standing president holding stocks or accepting money from lobbyist is Guilty of treason, because at that point they'd be putting personal gain above the people they were elected by to lead?and how would you suggest we achieve this worthy goal? I'll be second in line, once you get the mechanics worked out.
These are generalities. Can you describe how you would want to proceed, and what type of government you hope to see? It’s the specific actions that hold my interest.The United States completely changed the way government functions in 1776 at that time every other country was a dictatorship. Maybe its time for a reform. Instead of holding these corporate cucks who are getting huge amounts of money from pharmaceutical and oil lobbyists up on a pedestal. How about we only elect those who arent getting kickbacks from government contracts? IDK political tensions has caused people to see everyone as a extremist because they have a view different then their own, and thats not a great table to try and debate a solution at imho. People need to see that they arent much different from those in another party. Yes we all have different ideas but the whole concept of compromise is gone its either do this or were going to limit the things you do. To me this is foreshadowing of a social credit score.
campaign and election reform, regulate lobbies (still need 'em just not corporate greed mongers), take money out.and how would you suggest we achieve this worthy goal? I'll be second in line, once you get the mechanics worked out.
If we assume that established and discreet monied interests are behind the public figures, extremely hard.How hard is it to implement a policy where any standing president holding stocks or accepting money from lobbyist is Guilty of treason, because at that point they'd be putting personal gain above the people they were elected by to lead?
And slave owners....and criminals. sheeit
So because of an assumption that it will be hard we should just forget about it???If we assume that established and discreet monied interests are behind the public figures, extremely hard.
The logical reduction leads to revolution. Revolutions are awful painful things that tend to undergo a phase transition to authoritarian rule.
This is why I would be fascinated by a viable program to implement real democratizing change without resorting to sedition.
I’ve been saying more or less the opposite! I’m trying to find out how thoroughly you’ve considered the practical aspect.So because of an assumption that it will be hard we should just forget about it???
He needs to be held to account and an example made to others, but we have no control over how this will unfold, and the republicans are still competitive in the polls, very much so. They will need to be divided for the democrats to win a big enough majority for a mandate, particularly in the senate to defeat the filibuster rule and have simple majorities. I believe Trump can deliver on this, if allowed to run around long enough and it's not like we have a choice about his trial date. However, he will have a choice about whether he spends his pretrial time in custody or out running around causing mayhem for the republicans during primary season, perhaps to win it, only to leave them high and dry with a disqualifying conviction for insurrection.They can do it without agent orange.
He needs to be seen destroyed by the system he worked so hard to subvert.
Time for you to drop this narrative and Try Something New?