Cat fight.
Greene calls Boebert a ‘little b****’ as tensions boil over on House floor
Tensions between Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) boiled over on the House floor as Greene called Boebert a “little bitch” amid GOP frustration at the Colorado Republican’s move to try and force a vote on impeaching President Joe Biden.
During votes on Wednesday afternoon, Boebert approached Greene over statements she made earlier in the day for critiquing her move to force an impeachment vote,
the Daily Beast reported.
Greene accused Boebert of copying her own articles of impeachment against Biden, which Greene had previously asked her to cosponsor, the report said. And Greene also noted that she donated to Boebert and defended her.
At one point, Greene called Boebert a “little bitch.” Greene confirmed the exchange, later telling reporters that the Daily Beast’s story — including the name-calling — was “surprisingly accurate.”
Boebert’s office did not respond to a request for comment on the exchange, but
she told CNN of the reported exchange: “Like I said, I’m not in middle school.”
Greene expanded on her frustration with Boebert while speaking to reporters at the Capitol.
“I have defended her when she’s been attacked. She and I have virtually the same voting record. We’re both members of the House Freedom Caucus. We should be natural allies,” Greene said. “But for some reason, she has a great skill and talent for making most people here not like her. And so, it’s her issue.”
Greene said that she supported Boebert’s impeachment articles because she also wants to impeach Biden, but critiqued her approach. Boebert move to force a vote
surprised and angered many of her colleagues. “She didn’t talk to anyone about it. She didn’t come to the conference [meeting]. She didn’t address it with anybody. She copied my articles of impeachment, refused to cosponsor mine,” Greene said.
The Trump-supporting firebrands both arrived in Congress in 2020, and due to their ideological and stylistic similarities, were often lumped together. But the two have diverged in their tactical approaches over the last year or so, and have made clear they do not get along with each other.
One House GOP member told The Hill that Boebert and Greene have never liked each other, and sit at opposite ends of the table during House Freedom Caucus meetings. The tension between the two has burst into public view in the past — particularly around the time Boebert and other conservatives blocked Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) from immediately becoming Speaker, while Greene was a staunch supporter of McCarthy.
During the drawn-out Speaker’s fight in January, Greene and Boebert got into a confrontation in the women’s bathroom, the Daily Beast
reported.
“You were OK taking millions of dollars from McCarthy but you refuse to vote for him for Speaker, Lauren?” Greene reportedly said.
Boebert later
recounted the exchange to conservative commentator Dana Loesch. “When she started going after me, I looked at her and said, ‘Don’t be ugly,’” Boebert said.
And
in a December interview with conservative commentator Charlie Kirk, Boebert lamented being “accused of believing a lot of the things that [Greene] believes in.”
“I don’t believe in this, just like I don’t believe in Russian space lasers — Jewish space lasers and all of this,” Boebert said, in reference to a 2018 Facebook post from Greene in which she floated that a “laser beam or light beam” from “space solar generators” could be to blame for wildfires in California, also mentioning the “Rothschild Inc.” Greene
later said she did not know the Rothschilds have long been at the center of antisemitic conspiracy theories.
Greene shot back on Twitter.
“She gladly takes our $$$ but when she’s been asked: Lauren refuses to endorse President Trump, she refuses to support Kevin McCarthy, and she childishly threw me under the bus for a cheap sound bite,” Greene said of Boebert.
Editor’s note: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) said a Daily Beast story about her exchange with Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) was “impressively correct.” An earlier version of…
thehill.com
