I did not intend a hardware derail, but in retrospect that’s how it reads.
I’ll refocus on the main thing, which is
how to reduce the harm being done by people with guns.
The trivially obvious answer is “fewer guns”, in the hands of fewer civilians.
The first step is to require Federal registration of all arms that can be classed useful in an assault.
The next step is to disallow the transfer (including inheritance) of the firearms in class.
Taking guns away is not likely to happen and legally a bit fraught. So the obvious step is to terminate the civilian (incl. police and security employees) sale of high-capacity andor semiautomatic guns.
This is made hard by right-populist legislators who appeal to the “gravy seal LARP overkill fetishist” contingent of the base. They’re misusing the Constitution as a blunt weapon against gun laws that would be a no-brainer in any other developed nation. (See appended instance of that misuse.)
Just another bewildering instance of our exceptionalist politics. A salutary political shift needs to be built on a preceding cultural shift, and we’re seeing attitudes entrenched since the Civil War resurface like a case of shingles.
This is a long-term project, and for now one of the best tools is to keep putting every mass shooting on the front page. Slow steady erosion of the enabling culture.
And this is from someone who owns more than one gun.
The permitless carry law does not remove any gun eligibility requirements, such as who can purchase a firearm.
www.wcjb.com