Sounds to me like they had proof of concept in increased quality and production amounts.Sure it makes sense but where is the actual data with a side by side comparison showing the positive effects?
Ramping up light is self explanatory. You should never use more light than the plants are able to tolerate at that certain point in time. It's all about following the plants response.
It's however tiering with people trying to sound like they're reinventing the wheel and putting out statements without any real proof of concept or data to support their claims?