DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
That problem is international, and I posted a video on it a few days back, the just have a think guy was reviewing a UN report.with a Republican House?
That problem is international, and I posted a video on it a few days back, the just have a think guy was reviewing a UN report.with a Republican House?
Ok then —That problem is international, and I posted a video on it a few days back, the just have a think guy was reviewing a UN report.
We will see if the suicide squad wins on this one, recent extreme weather events and improving green options with lower costs are and will change minds. Hearts, minds and wallets make change along with votes and shifting demographics.Ok then —
with the global shift to the right?
Changing minds from the bottom up would be futile if the legislators dig in. US right now is an object lesson in the fragility of representative government. An entire party of two that matter has gone rogue and seen no consequence so far.We will see if the suicide squad wins on this one, recent extreme weather events and improving green options with lower costs are and will change minds. Hearts, minds and wallets make change along with votes and shifting demographics.
The shift to the right is a result of local cultural disintegration, or fear of it in the face of globalization. In America it takes the form of white trash nationalism and the perception that they are under siege by minorities. It sets up a war like frame of mind in its adherents and is expressed as culture wars in most places and political polarization. Many countries with small cultures and minority language speakers feel threatened, especially in Europe. It is a reaction to societies moving towards multicultural societies and that is useful for a place like the EU. In Canada Pierre Trudeau was a pioneer of multiculturalism decades ago. These days when people come, they do so by air, they don't integrate as quickly, with the internet and connections back home, also they can afford to travel halfway around the world for family visits and social events each year. Most can watch TV from back home or on the internet and read newspapers in their native language.Changing minds from the bottom up would be futile if the legislators dig in. US right now is an object lesson in the fragility of representative government. An entire party of two that matter has gone rogue and seen no consequence so far.
All over the G-20 right-populist politicians are lying to get elected, then taking wrecking balls to social democracy.
So, if the ruling class continue to successfully detach from democracy, how to implement the previously bolded?
It ain’t local.The shift to the right is a result of local cultural disintegration, or fear of it in the face of globalization. In America it takes the form of white trash nationalism and the perception that they are under siege by minorities. It sets up a war like frame of mind in its adherents and is expressed as culture wars in most places and political polarization. Many countries with small cultures and minority language speakers feel threatened, especially in Europe. It is a reaction to societies moving towards multicultural societies and that is useful for a place like the EU. In Canada Pierre Trudeau was a pioneer of multiculturalism decades ago. These days when people come, they do so by air, they don't integrate as quickly, with the internet and connections back home, also they can afford to travel halfway around the world for family visits and social events each year. Most can watch TV from back home or on the internet and read newspapers in their native language.
While it is tempting to lump all the right in with climate change deniers, I don't think this is the case in Europe. In America and Canada there is more of a correlation, mainly due to the corrupt nature of their leadership. Those who vote republican might feel differently about climate change than their leadership, but it's like the economy, the base has other priorities. I don't think the shift to the right in Europe will translate into climate denial on a political level as it does in America. Polling on climate change is not evenly divided, the GOP are pissing against the wind there too.It ain’t local.
Europe swings right — and reshapes the EU
Italy, Finland, Greece have recently moved. Spain could be next. The shift will affect everything from climate policy to migration.www.politico.eu
View attachment 5330184
The map is four years old. There’s a better one in the article, but it won’t copy. In the meantime Poland, Italy and Slovakia have elected right-populist governments, and AfD in Germany (Nazis, essentially) has made gains
It’s not not the case in Europe (if these people tell true).While it is tempting to lump all the right in with climate change deniers, I don't think this is the case in Europe. In America and Canada there is more of a correlation, mainly due to the corrupt nature of their leadership. Those who vote republican might feel differently about climate change than their leadership, but it's like the economy, the base has other priorities. I don't think the shift to the right in Europe will translate into climate denial on a political level as it does in America. Polling on climate change is not evenly divided, the GOP are pissing against the wind there too.
What the data says about Americans’ views of climate change
Two-thirds of Americans say the United States should prioritize developing renewable energy sources over expanding the production of fossil fuels.www.pewresearch.org
Funny correlation between immigrants and the rise of nationalism/fascismWhile it is tempting to lump all the right in with climate change deniers, I don't think this is the case in Europe. In America and Canada there is more of a correlation, mainly due to the corrupt nature of their leadership. Those who vote republican might feel differently about climate change than their leadership, but it's like the economy, the base has other priorities. I don't think the shift to the right in Europe will translate into climate denial on a political level as it does in America. Polling on climate change is not evenly divided, the GOP are pissing against the wind there too.
What the data says about Americans’ views of climate change
Two-thirds of Americans say the United States should prioritize developing renewable energy sources over expanding the production of fossil fuels.www.pewresearch.org
Your opening premise is not at all true. Spain, France, Italy and Germany are patchworks of distinct and often rival cultures and languages/dialects. The others likely as well (think Yorkshire, Sussex, Cornwall, … Scotland, Wales …) (Bavarians and Prussians have a lively contempt for each other.) but of these I know. Belgium and Ireland with their two languages; Switzerland with four. With few exceptions, European nations are more or less voluntary coalitions of several to many cultural entities.Funny correlation between immigrants and the rise of nationalism/fascism
The unique aspect of Europe was that each country was homogeneous and really never interacted that much with each other besides the aristocracy fuçking each other, some trade and lots and lots of wars.
Then came this truly alien phenomenon, outsiders coming to live with them and that was something to be feared.
Their purity was/is being threatened.
The US never ever was homogeneous and no matter the hype of this nation being a melting pot, it never will be. No
The EU is not heading there, it's there already.
It's a new World order for them, but we have been there for 100's of years and I don't think they'll like it very much, at all.
Nope, not one little bit.
You'll hear no argument from me on the points you made about the history of the countries in Europe.Your opening premise is not at all true. Spain, France, Italy and Germany are patchworks of distinct and often rival cultures and languages/dialects. The others likely as well (think Yorkshire, Sussex, Cornwall, … Scotland, Wales …) (Bavarians and Prussians have a lively contempt for each other.) but of these I know. Belgium and Ireland with their two languages; Switzerland with four. With few exceptions, European nations are more or less voluntary coalitions of several to many cultural entities.
The situation repeats on a smaller scale as well doesn’t make it untrue. I pointed it out myself several times in regards to the misuse of ‘europeans’ and ‘europe’. The US (and americans) tend to compare the US to the EU or ‘Europe’ but that’s not how it works from this side, where each and every country compares itself to other countries incl the US as a whole. Aside from a select few politicians totally into the eu thing, hardly anyone in europe refers to themselves as european (unless of course the context demands it). There’s germans, french, greeks etc. and they’re all sort of standalone. You’re absolutely right about that patchwork, but that’s more or less the same thing on a smaller scale.Your opening premise is not at all true.
Extreme weather events tend to change minds and farmers depend on the weather more than most people in cities. Much organized far right support is rural based in Europe and in North America. Rural populations might also benefit the most by going green at least in North America where rural power rates tend to be high and there will be opportunities to make money from solar, wind and agriculture. Then there is that sense of independence that the rural like too.And yes, of course there’s a huge overlap between climate change denial and far right in EU too. It’s depending from the perspective almost a 1-1 relationship, same parties, same voters. It’s just that some EU nations are so left (or US is so right…) that that doesn’t hold true depending on your perspective. Generally speaking, climate change denial on the left is almost an oxymoron, the sane right is sane enough not to deny it, which leaves the topic almost exclusively for far right and populist parties to exploit.
You realize that many of the same rural voters will be told that extreme weather comes from a deep-state conspiracy to engineer the weather to panic voters into furthering the goal of yoking the world with socialism.Extreme weather events tend to change minds and farmers depend on the weather more than most people in cities. Much organized far right support is rural based in Europe and in North America. Rural populations might also benefit the most by going green at least in North America where rural power rates tend to be high and there will be opportunities to make money from solar, wind and agriculture. Then there is that sense of independence that the rural like too.
Yep, but reality will come knocking at or knocking down their door before most urban people. I've observed that extreme weather events seem to drive concerns about climate change, so does not being able to get insurance for your house.You realize that many of the same rural voters will be told that extreme weather comes from a deep-state conspiracy to engineer the weather to panic voters into furthering the goal of yoking the world with socialism.