Examples of GOP Leadership
- Thread starter injinji
- Start date
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
doublejj
Well-Known Member
Texas AG Paxton sues five cities, including Austin and San Marcos, over marijuana policies
TX AG Paxton sues 5 cities over ordinances reducing low-level marijuana possession enforcement.
cbsaustin.com
Last edited:
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
A real vote getter that one.Texas AG Paxton sues five cities, including Austin and San Marcos, over marijuana policies
TX AG Paxton sues 5 cities over ordinances reducing low-level marijuana possession enforcement.
doublejj
Well-Known Member
OldMedUser
Well-Known Member
Not all of us. I'd be a dem if I lived in the states and vote a straight NDP ticket both federally and provincially here. New Democratic Party in case anyone wondered.
Budzbuddha
Well-Known Member
Well … Donald the Dumpster has the musical cream of the crop : Kid Rock / Vanilla Ice
Sorry …. I couldn’t keep a straight face ( Chet Laugh )
Dorian2
Well-Known Member
I'm still pissed at Vanilla Ice for ripping Queen's work. On another note, this Live at Wembley CD is highly recommended by yours truly.Well … Donald the Dumpster has the musical cream of the crop : Kid Rock / Vanilla Ice
Sorry …. I couldn’t keep a straight face ( Chet Laugh )
View attachment 5366456
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Every dollar Donald gets from the suckers is one less the republicans get, and he will need much more cash. I would look for red states and the RNC being forced to pay his legal fees, or else, it is primary season after all when Donald's power is at its peak.
I dunno who is gonna sell the assets and move the money around since he lost his bean counter and none of them have a brain between them. Seems to me everybody who works for him as a lawyer or an accountant is putting themselves at risk. They must be nervous and refusing to do illegal things now and Donald is probably still demanding they do them. Many will end up in court as witnesses if they criminally indict him in NY after the civil trial.
www.politico.com
I dunno who is gonna sell the assets and move the money around since he lost his bean counter and none of them have a brain between them. Seems to me everybody who works for him as a lawyer or an accountant is putting themselves at risk. They must be nervous and refusing to do illegal things now and Donald is probably still demanding they do them. Many will end up in court as witnesses if they criminally indict him in NY after the civil trial.
Trump spent more than he took in during 2023
His total legal bill is staggering. And it left one of his primary committees with little cash on hand.
www.politico.com
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
It was a sour joke about how far the political frame of perception has shifted right in both our nations.Not all of us. I'd be a dem if I lived in the states and vote a straight NDP ticket both federally and provincially here. New Democratic Party in case anyone wondered.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
no Nugent! Denied!Well … Donald the Dumpster has the musical cream of the crop : Kid Rock / Vanilla Ice
Sorry …. I couldn’t keep a straight face ( Chet Laugh )
View attachment 5366456
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
They always were to the right in Alberta, land of ranchers and oil, sound familiar? Lately they have been to the right of Attila the Hun, sound familiar?
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Brutally.
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
Paxton is a moron if he think this is gonna work. The nearest city i'm close to, the police won't arrest you or give you a citation, they'll just ask you to pour it out on the ground stomp on it and let u go. Most of the time it's just a citation if it's over a certain amount.....The ordinances were passed after being approved by voters in local ballot propositions. They prohibit police from making arrests or issuing citations for misdemeanor marijuana possession in most cases.Texas AG Paxton sues five cities, including Austin and San Marcos, over marijuana policies
TX AG Paxton sues 5 cities over ordinances reducing low-level marijuana possession enforcement.
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
Wow
apnews.com
Oregon high court says 10 GOP state senators who staged long walkout can’t run for reelection
2023’s boycott lasted six weeks — the longest in state history — and paralyzed the legislative session, stalling hundreds of bills.
apnews.com
Budzbuddha
Well-Known Member
To hell with them.Wow
Oregon high court says 10 GOP state senators who staged long walkout can’t run for reelection
2023’s boycott lasted six weeks — the longest in state history — and paralyzed the legislative session, stalling hundreds of bills.
May they plead with tears in their eyes
printer
Well-Known Member
Oops.
Oregon Supreme Court rules GOP lawmakers who walked out can’t run for reelection
The Oregon Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that 10 GOP state senators cannot run for reelection after they refused to attend Senate sessions for about six weeks out of protest last year in an attempt to stall Democratic-backed bills.
The court ruling upholds a secretary of state decision to keep the lawmakers off 2024 ballots, citing a 2022 referendum that bars lawmakers from seeking reelection if they have more than 10 unexcused absences.
The six-week boycott of the session paralyzed work and prevented voting, the longest such freeze in the state’s history. The absent lawmakers demanded legislative concessions in exchange for their return.
Republicans control a minority of the state Senate, 12 of the body’s 30 seats. By walking out, the Senate could not reach a quorum and conduct votes.
Five of the lawmakers challenged the secretary of state decision, arguing that the specific wording of the 2022 referendum should allow them one more term before being barred from office.
Court arguments focused on the grammar of the referendum, with each party arguing over when the election ban would take place.
The constitutional amendment says a lawmaker is not allowed to run “for the term following the election after the member’s current term is completed.” The lawmakers argued that would let them run again, as the election is held before the end of their terms, with the secretary of state and ultimately the state Supreme Court disagreeing.
The ballot referendum passed by a wide margin after similar GOP walkouts in 2019, 2020 and 2021.
The senators opposed the ruling in a statement acquired by The Associated Press.
“We obviously disagree with the Supreme Court’s ruling. But more importantly, we are deeply disturbed by the chilling impact this decision will have to crush dissent,” said Sen. Tim Knopp, the chamber’s Republican minority leader.
thehill.com
Oregon Supreme Court rules GOP lawmakers who walked out can’t run for reelection
The Oregon Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that 10 GOP state senators cannot run for reelection after they refused to attend Senate sessions for about six weeks out of protest last year in an attempt to stall Democratic-backed bills.
The court ruling upholds a secretary of state decision to keep the lawmakers off 2024 ballots, citing a 2022 referendum that bars lawmakers from seeking reelection if they have more than 10 unexcused absences.
The six-week boycott of the session paralyzed work and prevented voting, the longest such freeze in the state’s history. The absent lawmakers demanded legislative concessions in exchange for their return.
Republicans control a minority of the state Senate, 12 of the body’s 30 seats. By walking out, the Senate could not reach a quorum and conduct votes.
Five of the lawmakers challenged the secretary of state decision, arguing that the specific wording of the 2022 referendum should allow them one more term before being barred from office.
Court arguments focused on the grammar of the referendum, with each party arguing over when the election ban would take place.
The constitutional amendment says a lawmaker is not allowed to run “for the term following the election after the member’s current term is completed.” The lawmakers argued that would let them run again, as the election is held before the end of their terms, with the secretary of state and ultimately the state Supreme Court disagreeing.
The ballot referendum passed by a wide margin after similar GOP walkouts in 2019, 2020 and 2021.
The senators opposed the ruling in a statement acquired by The Associated Press.
“We obviously disagree with the Supreme Court’s ruling. But more importantly, we are deeply disturbed by the chilling impact this decision will have to crush dissent,” said Sen. Tim Knopp, the chamber’s Republican minority leader.
Oregon Supreme Court rules GOP lawmakers who walked out can’t run for reelection
The Oregon Supreme Court ruled Thursday that 10 GOP state senators cannot run for reelection after they refused to attend Senate sessions for about six weeks out of protest last year in an attempt …
thehill.com
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Good catch. I've been waiting to hear what the ruling on this would be.Oops.
Oregon Supreme Court rules GOP lawmakers who walked out can’t run for reelection
The Oregon Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that 10 GOP state senators cannot run for reelection after they refused to attend Senate sessions for about six weeks out of protest last year in an attempt to stall Democratic-backed bills.
The court ruling upholds a secretary of state decision to keep the lawmakers off 2024 ballots, citing a 2022 referendum that bars lawmakers from seeking reelection if they have more than 10 unexcused absences.
The six-week boycott of the session paralyzed work and prevented voting, the longest such freeze in the state’s history. The absent lawmakers demanded legislative concessions in exchange for their return.
Republicans control a minority of the state Senate, 12 of the body’s 30 seats. By walking out, the Senate could not reach a quorum and conduct votes.
Five of the lawmakers challenged the secretary of state decision, arguing that the specific wording of the 2022 referendum should allow them one more term before being barred from office.
Court arguments focused on the grammar of the referendum, with each party arguing over when the election ban would take place.
The constitutional amendment says a lawmaker is not allowed to run “for the term following the election after the member’s current term is completed.” The lawmakers argued that would let them run again, as the election is held before the end of their terms, with the secretary of state and ultimately the state Supreme Court disagreeing.
The ballot referendum passed by a wide margin after similar GOP walkouts in 2019, 2020 and 2021.
The senators opposed the ruling in a statement acquired by The Associated Press.
“We obviously disagree with the Supreme Court’s ruling. But more importantly, we are deeply disturbed by the chilling impact this decision will have to crush dissent,” said Sen. Tim Knopp, the chamber’s Republican minority leader.
Oregon Supreme Court rules GOP lawmakers who walked out can’t run for reelection
The Oregon Supreme Court ruled Thursday that 10 GOP state senators cannot run for reelection after they refused to attend Senate sessions for about six weeks out of protest last year in an attempt …
So, here it is. This initiative was passed by a good margin in 2022 because Republicans were stalling progress on important legislation, mainly the carbon tax laws and other measures to address climate change. Also it was used to stymie a legislative measure that replicated much of what was in the initiative to establish better gun regulations in Oregon. It's not a matter of crushing dissent, it's a matter of whether or not an illiberal minority can stop progress that most of the people in the state want, support and vote to see done. The Party of Trump has just been told they are irrelevant unless they can pivot to campaigning on ideas rather than proclamation.
Maybe at least in little old Oregon, we can have democracy rule again.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Grammar Nazis!Oops.
Oregon Supreme Court rules GOP lawmakers who walked out can’t run for reelection
The Oregon Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that 10 GOP state senators cannot run for reelection after they refused to attend Senate sessions for about six weeks out of protest last year in an attempt to stall Democratic-backed bills.
The court ruling upholds a secretary of state decision to keep the lawmakers off 2024 ballots, citing a 2022 referendum that bars lawmakers from seeking reelection if they have more than 10 unexcused absences.
The six-week boycott of the session paralyzed work and prevented voting, the longest such freeze in the state’s history. The absent lawmakers demanded legislative concessions in exchange for their return.
Republicans control a minority of the state Senate, 12 of the body’s 30 seats. By walking out, the Senate could not reach a quorum and conduct votes.
Five of the lawmakers challenged the secretary of state decision, arguing that the specific wording of the 2022 referendum should allow them one more term before being barred from office.
Court arguments focused on the grammar of the referendum, with each party arguing over when the election ban would take place.
The constitutional amendment says a lawmaker is not allowed to run “for the term following the election after the member’s current term is completed.” The lawmakers argued that would let them run again, as the election is held before the end of their terms, with the secretary of state and ultimately the state Supreme Court disagreeing.
The ballot referendum passed by a wide margin after similar GOP walkouts in 2019, 2020 and 2021.
The senators opposed the ruling in a statement acquired by The Associated Press.
“We obviously disagree with the Supreme Court’s ruling. But more importantly, we are deeply disturbed by the chilling impact this decision will have to crush dissent,” said Sen. Tim Knopp, the chamber’s Republican minority leader.
Oregon Supreme Court rules GOP lawmakers who walked out can’t run for reelection
The Oregon Supreme Court ruled Thursday that 10 GOP state senators cannot run for reelection after they refused to attend Senate sessions for about six weeks out of protest last year in an attempt …
GenericEnigma
Well-Known Member
Perhaps you are like me.
Most artists (Tom Morello, e.g., excepted) know jack all about politics. I take their opinions accordingly. But lots of people heed their opinions, which pundits realize and then elevate those opinions - giving the artists yet more credence. So it's a feedback loop of meaninglessness foisted as value.