Is Biden fit for duty?

Does Joe Biden have the cognitive function to run the country for another four years?

  • Yes

  • No

  • I don't believe Joe Biden is struggling with some type of cognitive decline.

Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
madvillian420 said:
www.snopes.com

8 Times Biden Has Been a 'Gaffe Machine'

We've constantly fact-checked claims about whether Biden misspoke in a speech or remark during his presidency.
www.snopes.com www.snopes.com

even snopes, another blatantly biased "source" is getting in on the fun. I wonder why they stopped their list at 8, theres at least another dozen.
Click to expand...
lol Still banging that tin pot are you?

Meanwhile Biden and the Democrats are running rings around confused MAGA Congressmen and their idiot crime boss. If the gaffes come with the leadership and excellent administration he delivered, gimme more of that.
 
madvillian420

madvillian420

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
lol Still banging that tin pot are you?

Meanwhile Biden and the Democrats are running rings around confused MAGA Congressmen and their idiot crime boss. If the gaffes come with the leadership and excellent administration he delivered, gimme more of that.
Click to expand...
keep that head in the sand, its easier im sure.

Trying to convince people that youre enjoying this shit sandwich of a presidency or (even worse) would like a second serving, does nobody any favors except the people and corporations that tricked you into endorsing them. Im just glad that i see less and less impartial regular folks clutching to this "my team" partisan shit most of you always predictably do here.

Some of the moves the dems do are some big brain, chess-not-checkers type shit ill admit, i would have never thought to just change the definition of the word "recession" to make it just not a thing, i did appreciate that one lol. Some of the info suppression and selective rule enforcement revealed in the Twitter files was pretty savvy and borderline impressive as well.
 
Nugnewbie

Nugnewbie

Well-Known Member
madvillian420 said:
keep that head in the sand, its easier im sure.

Trying to convince people that youre enjoying this shit sandwich of a presidency or (even worse) would like a second serving, does nobody any favors except the people and corporations that tricked you into endorsing them. Im just glad that i see less and less impartial regular folks clutching to this "my team" partisan shit most of you always predictably do here.

Some of the moves the dems do are some big brain, chess-not-checkers type shit ill admit, i would have never thought to just change the definition of the word "recession" to make it just not a thing, i did appreciate that one lol. Some of the info suppression and selective rule enforcement revealed in the Twitter files was pretty savvy and borderline impressive as well.
Click to expand...
How's that Biden impeachment goin'? Wahahaha f'n joke man.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
madvillian420 said:
keep that head in the sand, its easier im sure.

Trying to convince people that youre enjoying this shit sandwich of a presidency or (even worse) would like a second serving, does nobody any favors except the people and corporations that tricked you into endorsing them. Im just glad that i see less and less impartial regular folks clutching to this "my team" partisan shit most of you always predictably do here.

Some of the moves the dems do are some big brain, chess-not-checkers type shit ill admit, i would have never thought to just change the definition of the word "recession" to make it just not a thing, i did appreciate that one lol. Some of the info suppression and selective rule enforcement revealed in the Twitter files was pretty savvy and borderline impressive as well.
Click to expand...
Still waiting on any evidence Snopes is “blatantly biased”.

Text journalism only — no vids or Xitter.
 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
madvillian420 said:
its not just "a mistake" or a faux pas. Im one of the people that admired the speaking ability of 1990's Joe Biden, This happened during a speech about not being charged for a previous mistake with sensitive documents, also a report about other mistakes with important dates, and at least a dozen public gaffes and mixups with the names of countries and their leaders, mistaking which of his colleagues are alive or dead, etc. This didnt come out of the blue, its been a concern for most of us impartial folks for a while.

You seem to mistake me for someone who takes joy in the leader of their nation being in such condition, i surely dont. I would be just as loud if Trump couldnt remember these details and seemed so loopy and cognitively hindered. Theres a difference between your brain not working and being an dumb loud arrogant narcissist.

PS nobody tried to carry out a coup or overthow anything lol thats being dramatic so say the least. There is tweets and plenty of video footage of folks saying that Trump stole the election when he won. Remember the Russian collusion that was never even close to being proven true? even with the full power of the investigative agencies in the US... It was horseshit when they said it about him and horseshit when Trump said it about Biden, a bunch of rich sore losers.
Click to expand...



Im still reading through the thread, but this one was too good to pass up.

Yeah I remember well Trump's campaign manager handing over the information Trump got from the RNC on American citizens along with their campaign strategies and meetings the spoiled rich kids spawn was having with the "Crown Prosecutor of Russia" to get dirt on his American political opponent.

lmao this thread is hilarious, and outside of bumping it one more time to post this, well shit I guess it got me to do its dirty work in having some ridiculous threaded title bumped, so I guess it did its job.

https://www.rollitup.org/t/anyone-else-watching-the-kyle-rittenhouse-trial.1065377/post-16650028
 
madvillian420

madvillian420

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
Still waiting on any evidence Snopes is “blatantly biased”.

Text journalism only — no vids or Xitter.
Click to expand...
Ask for a source, denounce source, move goalpost, repeat. I know this game lol. Why would the side of the bias be against it? i completely understand. In sports the home team crowd will rarely disagree with calls made against their side, even if the demerit is deserved. silly hive mind shit.
nypost.com

Fact-checking the fact-checkers: ‘Pants on Fire’ partisans

Snopes.com describes itself as the “definitive fact-checking site,” yet turns out to be a big source of misinformation: Its cofounder has written dozens of plagiarized pieces — many of them at…
nypost.com nypost.com
 
Nugnewbie

Nugnewbie

Well-Known Member
madvillian420 said:
Ask for a source, denounce source, move goalpost, repeat. I know this game lol. Why would the side of the bias be against it? i completely understand. In sports the home team crowd will rarely disagree with calls made against their side, even if the demerit is deserved. silly hive mind shit.
nypost.com

Fact-checking the fact-checkers: ‘Pants on Fire’ partisans

Snopes.com describes itself as the “definitive fact-checking site,” yet turns out to be a big source of misinformation: Its cofounder has written dozens of plagiarized pieces — many of them at…
nypost.com nypost.com
Click to expand...
Lol, nice source, bwahahaha, bzzzzz, try again. Silly eh, bwahahaha
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
madvillian420 said:
Ask for a source, denounce source, move goalpost, repeat. I know this game lol. Why would the side of the bias be against it? i completely understand. In sports the home team crowd will rarely disagree with calls made against their side, even if the demerit is deserved. silly hive mind shit.
nypost.com

Fact-checking the fact-checkers: ‘Pants on Fire’ partisans

Snopes.com describes itself as the “definitive fact-checking site,” yet turns out to be a big source of misinformation: Its cofounder has written dozens of plagiarized pieces — many of them at…
nypost.com nypost.com
Click to expand...
It is only prudent to speak up if a poor reference is used to back a rather unusual claim.

Good news: you’re not quoting vids or Xits.

Bad news: you’re quoting Murdochs, proven fake news champions and promoters of the new fascism and their “culture war”. From MBFC:

Analysis / Bias
In review, the New York Post tends to publish stories utilizing sensationalized headlines with emotionally loaded wording such as “Cop cold-cocks unarmed man ‘acting irate’ at restaurant,” and “It’s time for Bill Clinton to take a walk in the Chappaqua woods.”The New York Post also republishes news from other sources, such as the least-biased Associated Press. More stories favor the right, but the NY Post does not shy away from reporting negative coverage of the right if it is a big story. They also tend to source their information properly; however, many times, the headline misleadingly exaggerates the actual story they are reporting.

Editorially, The Post has endorsed the Republican Presidential Candidate in every race since 1980. However, in 2016 they did not offer either candidate an endorsement for the Presidential election.

According to an LA Times article, the New York Post is reported to be former U.S. President Donald Trump’s preferred newspaper, which maintains frequent contact with Rupert Murdoch. The Post, According to a surveyconducted by Pace University in 2004, was rated the least credible major news outlet in New York. The Post has been criticized since the beginning of Murdoch’s ownership for “sensationalism, blatant advocacy, and conservative bias.”

Failed Fact Checks
Overall we rate the New York Post on the far end of Right-Center Biased due to story selection that typically favors the Right and Mixed (borderline questionable) for factual reporting based on several failed fact checks.(7/16/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 11/11/2022)

Source: https://nypost.com/

In addition, the article you posted as some sort of “proof” is long on dogwhistle emotioneering and short on citations. There is nothing to suggest that it isn’t Repug bias off its leash.

Any “news” outlet that racks up failed Snopes checks is understandably motivated to trash the site. Authoritarians have been killing inconvenient messengers for ten thousand years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top