well I doubt he was over the limit, he is a big guy and he just had a couple of drinks with dinner...but yes he was probably still intoxicated
They may just be adding the intoxication charge to round out the view on him. They know that it could be almost impossible to prove his intoxication. What they've really got a hair across their asses about is the racing, and he entered into the race in full knowledge of its dangers and legality. He shares full responsibility here.
a good lawyer will get his charge reduced or dismissed..the other guy who wrecked the car might be screwed...and how can the court prove he was drunk??? was there documentation by the police?
Witness statements would help, and may likely suffice to prove that he was drinking, what they'd also need is (likely multiple) witness statements that he was clearly intoxicated. The issue is that, according to the law, he shares responsibility for the accident here. And, in my honest opinion, not just legally, but ethically and morally as well.
Most states have laws that say if you commit a crime (racing in this case)... and someone dies in the process (the date in this case), you're gonna face murder/manslaughter charges.
Yep.
secondly if he was not part of the accident then its impossible for him to be charged with leaving the scene
if they get him to talk its over for him, u better tell him to shut his mouth and mortgage the house for a good lawyer
I believe that is incorrect, based on the fact that they sat on this for a year (means they're getting counsel on how to proceed with it), and that they were RACING. Cali has some tough new racing laws because there have been enough deaths to make it an issue.
My sis just tole me he didnt get a dui that night,, I dont know where I got that fomr, just pulled it out of my ass I guess...heres the story if you dont believe me..I dont see why I would make something like this up though
http://www.myfoxla.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail/PrintFriendly?contentId=8065476&version=2&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=1.1.1&siteParams=1003&print=true&detailAction=/Home/Detail&portletLogoDisplayed=1
You have no idea just how close that is to where I used to live. It is considered holy ground by Buddhists.
not really, because that would make everyone responsible for everything. a driver in the nascar 500 dies in the race, all drivers get manslaughter?
Of course not, it's an organized race with trained professionals in specially designed vehicles on a private track who are wearing all the safety gear in existence PLUS they have ambulance, fire and paramedic on hand. This is opposed to an impromptu race being held by a couple of drunk kids out on a date and having been served enough drinks (underage, as well, apparently) fucking around on the public roads. Seriously, it can't be that difficult to make the distinctions here, can it?
your basically liberally interpretting the situation to fit your emotional needs.
cause we can keep goin and say blame the car manufacturer for allowing cars to go fast enough to flip and die.
we can go even farther than that and goto the DMV for allowing someone that hasn't been screened for mental instabillities to drive.
we can keep goin and place blame on others instead of taking personal responsibility.
Hardly! Her assertions, and the assertions of people who have an actual grasp of the law are not purely emotional, and they're not trying to make this thing 'fit their emotional needs'. Wow. I think panhead said it all best.
I won't say the rest of what I've got to say, except that this is NOT the place to come to for legal advice, clearly!