OregonMeds
Well-Known Member
I'm one of the most vocal people on here I think as far as trying to encourage people to go HPS over CFL. I am responsible for steering a lot of people to the $20 150hps, created one of the largest threads on that light, created the slickdeals post about it, always trying to get people to take back their aerogardens etc etc so please don't think this comes from the wrong place BUT....
This is not a fair and accurate comparison at all and it has nothing to do with the angles of the pictures or anything. I'm sorry, but any cfl grower can do better than even the HPS bud you show. I don't think you had any of your lights close enough or your plants were starved for nutrients or fresh air or something or you ran too few lights in too big an area or a combination of many of the above. I also am getting the feeling that the security light you think is hps is actually cfl. I didn't read the whole thread it didn't seem to be going anywhere very accurate so just had to skip to the end and try to shed some real light on this.
Could be a comparison of small cfl's used too far away to a bigger cfl used too far away. Or perhaps the hps bulbs are too old if there was a hps. I see mention here of 20k hour life but that means nothing to us and in reality they are only good for 2-3grows.
Please I'm not trying to start an argument or diss the op or call him a liar or anything of that sort but I just think he's made some massive mistakes unknowingly. And yes, there is no 42w HPS.
I hope you're not upset with what I've had to say, I'd like to help you get more out of whichever lights you actually do have. I can help you easily double if not triple or quadruple what you yielded in this thread provided you have enough of whichever type of light and will be happy to do so.
Anyway as much as I love hps and etc it's just not fair to the cfl guys (or the small HPS guys) to let this slide as an accurate representation of what you might expect from either type of light. At least not used properly with enough of either.
peace....
This is not a fair and accurate comparison at all and it has nothing to do with the angles of the pictures or anything. I'm sorry, but any cfl grower can do better than even the HPS bud you show. I don't think you had any of your lights close enough or your plants were starved for nutrients or fresh air or something or you ran too few lights in too big an area or a combination of many of the above. I also am getting the feeling that the security light you think is hps is actually cfl. I didn't read the whole thread it didn't seem to be going anywhere very accurate so just had to skip to the end and try to shed some real light on this.
Could be a comparison of small cfl's used too far away to a bigger cfl used too far away. Or perhaps the hps bulbs are too old if there was a hps. I see mention here of 20k hour life but that means nothing to us and in reality they are only good for 2-3grows.
Please I'm not trying to start an argument or diss the op or call him a liar or anything of that sort but I just think he's made some massive mistakes unknowingly. And yes, there is no 42w HPS.
I hope you're not upset with what I've had to say, I'd like to help you get more out of whichever lights you actually do have. I can help you easily double if not triple or quadruple what you yielded in this thread provided you have enough of whichever type of light and will be happy to do so.
Anyway as much as I love hps and etc it's just not fair to the cfl guys (or the small HPS guys) to let this slide as an accurate representation of what you might expect from either type of light. At least not used properly with enough of either.
peace....