HotNSexyMILF
Well-Known Member
My dear We... is that you? LOL.. The laundry list of links for the sheeple makes it pretty apparent it is.. LOL.. gosh I've been out of the loop, when did you come back around??
It says "The purpose of a national emergency center shall be to use existing infrastructure"(b) Purpose of National Emergency Centers- The purpose of a national emergency center shall be to use existing infrastructure--
(1) to provide temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance to individuals and families dislocated due to an emergency or major disaster;
(2) to provide centralized locations for the purposes of training and ensuring the coordination of Federal, State, and local first responders;
(3) to provide centralized locations to improve the coordination of preparedness, response, and recovery efforts of government, private, and not-for-profit entities and faith-based organizations; and
(4) to meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security.
how exactly did you extrapolate that they are confinement camps just from the portion you posted, I dont get it. Sounds normal to me.I saw someone say FEMA Death Camps, chuckled a little bit, then sobered up after seeing this bill:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-645
To keep us safe and secure... right? They would never use these camps against us.
It says "The purpose of a national emergency center shall be to use existing infrastructure"
Apparently there are hundreds of military "camps" or "centers" all over the country already, so I guess this is what they mean by existing infrastructure.
Death camps? Probably not. Containment camps? Most definitely. Personally, I find mass containment areas dangerous for those who live in them. No matter how good and loving your government is. Being thrown into a cage like cattle is fucked up.
As for the economy. Lol... let's not be stupid anymore, ok? This isn't going to be fixed and stay the same. A new system is going to rise from this.
Something economist David Aschauer identified two decades ago: Private sector productivity and economic output (gross domestic product) increases in relation to non-military public spending. Remember President Bushs recommendation that Americans go out and shop? He was onto something since our economy is driven by personal consumption.
Unfortunately, his record on jobs growth, at 2.3 percent during his eight years in office, is tied for the lowest on record since Harry Truman. Only his fathers and Gerald Fords records equaled his and all three favored tax cuts as their driver of economic expansion. They failed to realize when people dont have full employment, they arent willing to consume.
History shows during their presidencies, economic growth averaged below 1.5 percent, disproving their tax-cuts-as-engine-of-economic-growth model. Average annual GDP growth during the Democratic presidencies from JFK onward exceeded 2.5 percent per year and each employed the Keynesian public spending model shunned by out-of-touch Republicans.
http://www.tennessean.com/article/20090204/OPINION02/90203058Deficit swelled under George W. Bush
To the Editor:
Marsha Blackburns column Feb. 1 shows how out of touch many Republicans in Congress are and why the Democratic Party swept into power with such an overwhelming majority (Spending as usual is no stimulus).
She rightly pointed out that federal spending jumped last year and the budget deficit swelled to a massive $1.2 trillion. What she left out is that $864 billion is due to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Were mired in Afghanistan, seven years after taking our eyes of the ball to start the war in Iraq that Marsha and fellow Republicans fully supported.
What Marsha fails to mention is something Economist David Aschauer identified two decades ago: Private sector productivity and economic output (gross domestic product) increases in relation to non-military public spending. Remember President Bushs recommendation that Americans go out and shop? He was onto something since our economy is driven by personal consumption.
Unfortunately, his record on jobs growth, at 2.3 percent during his eight years in office, is tied for the lowest on record since Harry Truman. Only his fathers and Gerald Fords records equaled his and all three favored tax cuts as their driver of economic expansion. They failed to realize when people dont have full employment, they arent willing to consume.
History shows during their presidencies, economic growth averaged below 1.5 percent, disproving their tax-cuts-as-engine-of-economic-growth model. Average annual GDP growth during the Democratic presidencies from JFK onward exceeded 2.5 percent per year and each employed the Keynesian public spending model shunned by out-of-touch Republicans.
Maura Satchell, SMYRNA 37167
The weekend before the inauguration, I was visiting my folks who live in another state and I decided to go to a gun show there. I did not need another firearm. I merely intended to purchase a handgun to make a personal contribution to the Obama Effect.not to mention that in the first week of january the democrats tried to push a bill through congress which would allow the attorney general to have an all out ban on whatever semi-auto guns that he saw fit.. this is the first week of the new year before obama (dont forget he voted multiple times for all out bans on guns as well as wrote anti gun legislation himself) has even had a chance to get into office and start his glorious "change"... thank god america is seeing all out record gun sales despite the economy.. shows we do still have a pulse after all.
Aww. But these new bills look so fair and good for the country. Making it nearly impossible to buy guns is the American way! Putting the people into camps when disaster strikes is a brilliant idea to keep us safe from those scary terrorists.Yes.. H.R.45 certainly is a nightmare.. ugh..
Oh Dizzy.. what did I tell you about the kool aid?.. LOL..Aww. But these new bills look so fair and good for the country. Making it nearly impossible to buy guns is the American way! Putting the people into camps when disaster strikes is a brilliant idea to keep us safe from those scary terrorists.
all governments gravitate to socialism.it is the natural evolution of government and the control of power..power is like crack to these people..they will steal your freedom for their power..and the ONLY WAY YOU ARE GOING TO GET IT BACK IS TO KILL THEM ALL...sorry to be so blunt..wow i hope you guys are wrong
nothing to do but wait, not preparing, preparing for what?
fema death camps? pfffffft
i honestly dont think the government is out to fuck us THAT hard... and if they are, then well... i guess thats my fault for not buying into some of the more crazier conspiracy theories out there