So recently one of the nut jobs on the left had the audacity to accuse me of being a Sociopath. What's ironic is the fact that after reading a description of what constitutes a Sociopath the only conclusion that I was able to reach was that it was a description of people on the left, and most politicians.
http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html
I most assuredly do not have that, I can not count the number of times I've been called an ass or some other term meant to illustrate the fact that I don't kiss ass, refrain from expressing myself, or adhere to the insanity of the left in an effort to get along with the left.
This, compared to the vast majority of the left, who while they do not necessarily believe in everything the left wants them to believe in blindly goes along with the rest of the left to "get along." Illustrating that the left, or Socialists, insist on everyone excercising superficial charm to push forth the Agenda of the state.
Yet another description of Socialists.
They want to ignore the Property Rights of others, ignore the right of others to speak their mind, ignore the rights of others to expect that the Federal Government (or any government) will not arbitrarily steal from them.
They are also hostile and domineering using their pseudo-moral high ground in attempts to assassinate the character of those that go against their insane beliefs.
I don't think I need to explain how this describes the left with their continual rants about fairness and how they have a right to steal other peoples money for healthcare. Which according to them is a right not a privilege (of getting off your ass and working.)
Obama? Hillary? Reid? Miller? a lot of other politicians. Of course its not limited to just politicians. Just about any socialist repeatedly lies. They lie by ommission,commission or misdirection. They pretend to be refuting points by making the points and excersize an amazing ability to manipulate what others have said to attack others, despite knowing that the other person did not actually say or mean what they are being accused of having said or meant.
This goes back to the Socialist belief that it is their right to violate the rights of others. Some how there is no immorality in stealing the property of others. According to them there is some kind of justification for "noble" ends that justify the shittiest most immoral means out there.
From my experience I'd actually say that Liberals tend to be bitchy, whiny self-absorbed people that will not hold a door for some one if it means wasting part of their time. Whereas a conservative doesn't even think about doing such things, because they were brought up to treat others with respect (less those that refuse to treat them with the same.)
I've also seen liberals explode over what ultimately is very insignificant. Erupting into infantile like temper tantrums for the most absurd of reasons. Of course, I was guilt of the same, when I was five.
Which explains why they have to express it through materialist means. They want everyone to have a puppy, and a car, and a house, and healthcare and so on and so forth. This of course is because they can not actually express love through non-material means, having not the intelligence to believe in something as ethereal as emotion (the same reason they can't believe in a higher power.)
This goes back to their temper tantrums over arbitrary slights. And with out a doubt liberals are undoubtedly promiscuous. They are after all the ones that brought us the "era" of STDS, err free love.
Another charge that can be placed against them is their Lack of Empathy with their victims (those that have money.) Liberals don't understand that people don't want to have their property stolen, and can't seem to grasp the fact that just because they can "afford" it (a arbitrary judgment made in the typical one size fits all paradigm of the left.) doesn't justify stealing from them.
Ties in to the above.
Well, there's Bill Gates (a crazy liberal) who released a bunch of mosquitos. There's George Soros, who made a sizable portion of his fortune by manipulating the markets.
The left also routinely ignores the rights of other people to not have to worry that the state and the mob pushing it are going to arbitrarily steal more of their money proving their cruelty to their fellow man.
More extreme examples are the environmentalist flakes that believe that the solution is to kill 90% of the population of the world.
Repetition of one of the earlier points.
Can you say "net tax eater" or doesn't pay their actual fair share but insists that everyone else must pay more than their fair share. They are ignorant of the fact that if everyone was to actually pay their "FAIR" share - that is if they were to pay the amount of taxes that would pay for the amount of services they receive - the middle and upper classes would see their taxes drop and the poor would see a drastic tax hike.
Of course, since they also are incapable of empathy they do not understand that fair would mean that everyone pays the same dollar amount for the privelege of living in the United States, not that everyone pays some arbitrary percentage determined by politicians in the various state capitols and in D.C.
Changes the label that they apply to themselves.
Socialists
Democrats
Liberals
Progressives
(what's next?)
Attempts to repackage their message of enslavement in fluffier terms to mislead the public.
No, I'm afraid that when it comes to anti-social tendencies the left illustrates all the classic behaviors. Promptly followed by politicians (which of course is not surprising.)
