Operation 420
Well-Known Member
Cute, coming from the most brainwashed, naive person on these boards. Ten Feet may have you beat, but not by much.
Enjoy your Koolaid...
Cute, coming from the most brainwashed, naive person on these boards. Ten Feet may have you beat, but not by much.
Boehner is as bad as Polosi, I don't trust either of them, they are anti anything anyone else says.hannimal
you see...
your saying Bhoener is anti obama and i shouldnt trust what he says...
he is a representative in this country...
Don't know who this guy is (http://www.housingwire.com/ , looks like a investment website), but I fell onto it while looking for what section your talking about. But at least I got the section 201.Home Energy Audits Optional in Cap-and-Trade Bill
By JON PRIOR
June 30, 2009 8:56 PM CST
http://www.housingwire.com/about/advertising/ http://www.hw-ads.com/ads/www/delivery/ck.php?oaparams=2__bannerid=240__zoneid=35__cb=4b64a87205__oadest=http://www.MASSACHUSETTESHOUSEAUCTION.com
http://www.hw-ads.com/ads/www/delivery/ck.php?oaparams=2__bannerid=32__zoneid=49__cb=825b31462b__oadest=http://www.marktomarket.comA section in HR 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act, which narrowly passed a US House of Representatives vote Friday, falls short of mandating an energy audit on homes, according to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Section 204 of the cap-and-trade bill establishes a building energy performance labeling program for homes and commercial property. The section would provide potential buyers and investors in those properties a label explaining that property’s energy efficiency.
Much like a nutrition label on the back of a candy bar, the performance labeling program is a consumer right-to-know provision in the cap-and-trade bill, but it is not required, according to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Section 202 of the bill develops the Retrofit for Energy and Environmental Performance (REEP) program. If the owner of the building — residential or commercial — seeks financial assistance from REEP, the property must pass the energy audit.
Energy savings for residential properties are determined by the Home Energy Ratings System (HERS) Index, and the final score is selected by an objective third party, according to the bill.
After the audit is conducted, state and local REEP programs may grant funds to owners for retrofit improvements on energy efficiency.
So then;SEC. 201. GREATER ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN BUILDING CODES.
- Section 304 of the Energy Conservation and Production Act (42 U.S.C. 6833) is amended to read as follows:
Anyway I was reading through it and cannot find anything about mandates on sales of homes or just to get the audit even if your not moving. It does say things about new homes meeting the standards though. And sales of commercial buildings. Also things about bringing non-residential buildings up to code after a while.Just check it yourself it is crazy long http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c111:1:./temp/~c111Dnw938:e365983:
Ha! You will buy into any lame insane theory devised here that is anti Obama. And then totally dismiss any actual information.Cute, coming from the most brainwashed, naive person on these boards. Ten Feet may have you beat, but not by much.
Enjoy your Koolaid...
So fun ChChoda. You didn't know that I am him? Yeah I come on here to pick up insane ideas that you all are so afraid of so that I can take it and make it my own. Infact Michelle says hi.You really love "the" O "man", don't you?
Hell, I thought you were Sasha...So fun ChChoda. You didn't know that I am him? Yeah I come on here to pick up insane ideas that you all are so afraid of so that I can take it and make it my own. Infact Michelle says hi.
Anyway now that you found me out, I would like to point out that I have said he has made mistakes, and actually pointed out one that is true (firing the DA). But as you have to be anti-O with all things I can see that you like to project your feelings onto others.
Wait, I better be careful, since this is on the internet and is not based on anything you have actually researched you will believe it.
I lied, I am not Obama.
SEC. 401. - ANY individual who doesnt have acceptable HC according to Government will be taxed 2.5% of income AND Any NONRESIDENT Alien is EXEMPT from individual taxes. (Americans will pay)Well you could always just fact check what I say here, they don't seem too biased...
http://www.therightmovement.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=426:update-hr-3200-every-american-needs-to-know&catid=207:AmericanPie
basically, from what i have gotten from han, is that there are certain parts of the bill he cant findSEC. 401. - ANY individual who doesnt have acceptable HC according to Government will be taxed 2.5% of income AND Any NONRESIDENT Alien is EXEMPT from individual taxes. (Americans will pay)
H.R. 3200 STATES:
SEC. 401. TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE HEALTH CARE COVERAGE
Subpart A--Tax on Individuals Without Acceptable Health Care Coverage
`Sec. 59B. Tax on individuals without acceptable health care coverage.
`SEC. 59B. TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE HEALTH CARE COVERAGE.
`(a) Tax Imposed- In the case of any individual who does not meet the requirements of subsection (d) at any time during the taxable year, there is hereby imposed a tax equal to 2.5 percent of the excess of--
(1) the taxpayer's modified adjusted gross income for the taxable year, over
(2) the amount of gross income specified in section 6012(a)(1) with respect to the taxpayer.
(c) Exceptions-
(2) NONRESIDENT ALIENS- Subsection (a) shall not apply to any individual who is a nonresident alien.
You are naive.
Did we not cover that section 401 in the other thread a few days ago? I cannot help that you guys are talking about one thing and then TBT comes in and posts a completely different bill (we were talking about the cap and trade and boom he comes in on the health insurance bill).basically, from what i have gotten from han, is that there are certain parts of the bill he cant find
since he cant find them, he refuses to believe they exist...
i mean.... hannimal.....im calling you out with this question
did you even WATCH ANY SINGLE ONE of the youtube CSPAN videos.........(or was it CNN)
TBT. You are getting about as snide as they are. I had expected more from you. I get it that you are pissed about the insurance bill. But seriously you are one of the ones that could afford insurance and chose not to. I get that and I understand that you work hard and pay your own bills.You are naive.
So now that we have covered that again. Can we go back to what we were actually talking about before you decided to say I didn't know what I was talking about pointing to something completely different from what was being discussed?PART 1--INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY
SEC. 401. TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE HEALTH CARE COVERAGE.
- (a) In General- Subchapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new part
‘PART VIII--HEALTH CARE RELATED TAXES
‘subpart a. tax on individuals without acceptable health care coverage.
‘Subpart A--Tax on Individuals Without Acceptable Health Care Coverage‘SEC. 59B. TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE HEALTH CARE COVERAGE.
- ‘Sec. 59B. Tax on individuals without acceptable health care coverage.
3
‘(a) Tax Imposed- In the case of any individual who does not meet the requirements of subsection (d) at any time during the taxable year, there is hereby imposed a tax equal to 2.5 percent of the excess of--
‘(b) Limitations-
- ‘(1) the taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross income for the taxable year, over
‘(2) the amount of gross income specified in section 6012(a)(1) with respect to the taxpayer.
‘(c) Exceptions-
- ‘(1) TAX LIMITED TO AVERAGE PREMIUM-
‘(2) PRORATION FOR PART YEAR FAILURES- The tax imposed under subsection (a) with respect to any taxpayer for any taxable year shall not exceed the amount which bears the same ratio to the amount of tax so imposed (determined without regard to this paragraph and after application of paragraph (1)) as--
- ‘(A) IN GENERAL- The tax imposed under subsection (a) with respect to any taxpayer for any taxable year shall not exceed the applicable national average premium for such taxable year.
‘(B) APPLICABLE NATIONAL AVERAGE PREMIUM-
- ‘(i) IN GENERAL- For purposes of subparagraph (A), the ‘applicable national average premium’ means, with respect to any taxable year, the average premium (as determined by the Secretary, in coordination with the Health Choices Commissioner) for self-only coverage under a basic plan which is offered in a Health Insurance Exchange for the calendar year in which such taxable year begins.
‘(ii) FAILURE TO PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR MORE THAN ONE INDIVIDUAL- In the case of any taxpayer who fails to meet the requirements of subsection (e) with respect to more than one individual during the taxable year, clause (i) shall be applied by substituting ‘family coverage’ for ‘self-only coverage’.
- ‘(A) the aggregate periods during such taxable year for which such individual failed to meet the requirements of subsection (d), bears to
‘(B) the entire taxable year.
‘(d) Acceptable Coverage Requirement-
- ‘(1) DEPENDENTS- Subsection (a) shall not apply to any individual for any taxable year if a deduction is allowable under section 151 with respect to such individual to another taxpayer for any taxable year beginning in the same calendar year as such taxable year.
‘(2) NONRESIDENT ALIENS- Subsection (a) shall not apply to any individual who is a nonresident alien.
‘(3) INDIVIDUALS RESIDING OUTSIDE UNITED STATES- Any qualified individual (as defined in section 911(d)) (and any qualifying child residing with such individual) shall be treated for purposes of this section as covered by acceptable coverage during the period described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 911(d)(1), whichever is applicable.
‘(4) INDIVIDUALS RESIDING IN POSSESSIONS OF THE UNITED STATES- Any individual who is a bona fide resident of any possession of the United States (as determined under section 937(a)) for any taxable year (and any qualifying child residing with such individual) shall be treated for purposes of this section as covered by acceptable coverage during such taxable year.
‘(5) RELIGIOUS CONSCIENCE EXEMPTION-
- 1
‘(A) IN GENERAL- Subsection (a) shall not apply to any individual (and any qualifying child residing with such individual) for any period if such individual has in effect an exemption which certifies that such individual is a member of a recognized religious sect or division thereof described in section 1402(g)(1) and an adherent of established tenets or teachings of such sect or division as described in such section.
‘(B) EXEMPTION- An application for the exemption described in subparagraph (A) shall be filed with the Secretary at such time and in such form and manner as the Secretary may prescribe. Any such exemption granted by the Secretary shall be effective for such period as the Secretary determines appropriate.
‘(e) Other Definitions and Special Rules-
- ‘(1) IN GENERAL- The requirements of this subsection are met with respect to any individual for any period if such individual (and each qualifying child of such individual) is covered by acceptable coverage at all times during such period.
‘(2) ACCEPTABLE COVERAGE- For purposes of this section, the term ‘acceptable coverage’ means any of the following:
- ‘(A) QUALIFIED HEALTH BENEFITS PLAN COVERAGE- Coverage under a qualified health benefits plan (as defined in section 100(c) of the America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009).
‘(B) GRANDFATHERED HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE; COVERAGE UNDER GRANDFATHERED EMPLOYMENT-BASED HEALTH PLAN- Coverage under a grandfathered health insurance coverage (as defined in subsection (a) of section 102 of the America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009) or under a current employment-based health plan (within the meaning of subsection (b) of such section).
‘(C) MEDICARE- Coverage under part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act.
‘(D) MEDICAID- Coverage for medical assistance under title XIX of the Social Security Act.
‘(E) MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND DEPENDENTS (INCLUDING TRICARE)- Coverage under chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, including similar coverage furnished under section 1781 of title 38 of such Code.
‘(F) VA- Coverage under the veteran’s health care program under chapter 17 of title 38, United States Code, but only if the coverage for the individual involved is determined by the Secretary in coordination with the Health Choices Commissioner to be not less than the level specified by the Secretary of the Treasury, in coordination with the Secretary of Veteran’s Affairs and the Health Choices Commissioner, based on the individual’s priority for services as provided under section 1705(a) of such title.
‘(G) OTHER COVERAGE- Such other health benefits coverage as the Secretary, in coordination with the Health Choices Commissioner, recognizes for purposes of this subsection.
‘(f) Regulations- The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations or other guidance as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of this section, including regulations or other guidance (developed in coordination with the Health Choices Commissioner) which provide--
- ‘(1) QUALIFYING CHILD- For purposes of this section, the term ‘qualifying child’ has the meaning given such term by section 152(c).
‘(2) BASIC PLAN- For purposes of this section, the term ‘basic plan’ has the meaning given such term under section 100(c) of the America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009.
‘(3) HEALTH INSURANCE EXCHANGE- For purposes of this section, the term ‘Health Insurance Exchange’ has the meaning given such term under section 100(c) of the America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009, including any State-based health insurance exchange approved for operation under section 208 of such Act.
‘(4) FAMILY COVERAGE- For purposes of this section, the term ‘family coverage’ means any coverage other than self-only coverage.
‘(5) MODIFIED ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME- For purposes of this section, the term ‘modified adjusted gross income’ means adjusted gross income--‘(6) NOT TREATED AS TAX IMPOSED BY THIS CHAPTER FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES- The tax imposed under this section shall not be treated as tax imposed by this chapter for purposes of determining the amount of any credit under this chapter or for purposes of section 55.
- ‘(A) determined without regard to section 911, and
‘(B) increased by the amount of interest received or accrued by the taxpayer during the taxable year which is exempt from tax.
(b) Information Reporting-
- ‘(1) exemption from the tax imposed under subsection (a) in cases of de minimis lapses of acceptable coverage,
‘(2) a process for applying for a waiver of the application of subsection (a) in cases of hardship.’.
(1) IN GENERAL- Subpart B of part III of subchapter A of chapter 61 of such Code is amended by inserting after section 6050W the following new
If you watched the videos you would find out that they had a mysterious 300 pages (they changed the WHOLE BILL on the floor)they added at 3am the night before, and wouldn't bring to the floor among other shenanigans. If you want a link for the bill why don't you utilize your search skills sir.Oh and no I did not watch those cnn videos. I have the ability to read and don't need to have peoples words when I cannot see what they are reading in the first place. Because I do not trust politicians, which I would think that your panic about everything Obama would understand.
God man do you not read what I post before you jump on me? I posted the entire link on the first page. Don't you get it, I have seen this before.If you watched the videos you would find out that they had a mysterious 300 pages (they changed the WHOLE BILL on the floor)they added at 3am the night before, and wouldn't bring to the floor among other shenanigans. If you want a link for the bill why don't you utilize your search skills sir.
I am curious about those. Since this is your information I thought that you would be able to tell me where to find it.your efficiency audits both before AND after you buy/sell a house
any time you make a home improvement you have to be audited for energy efficiency
God man do you not read what I post before you jump on me? I posted the entire link on the first page. Don't you get it, I have seen this before.
Look no further than the dems and Michael Moore attacking the patriot act for all the secret pages put in last minute. This is a tactic that they created to stir up angst and panic. They vote on things, say what they want / don't want through negotiations, then when it is rewritten they vote on it.
And I posted the link to the bill on the first page of this. What I was saying is that the things pointed to:
I am curious about those. Since this is your information I thought that you would be able to tell me where to find it.
So then I take it you did not look up these and try to get the actual data?where to find it? HELLO!?!?!?!?
I POSTED VIDEOS WITH ALL OF THIS INFORMATION
yet you REFUSE to look at it cause you "dont trust politicians"
even when they are reading a government document word for word......
why dont you stop ignoring the evidence and watch the video.... you will be shocked....
and do i really have to tell you again? this is NOT about obama
i do not hate obama, because obama is a puppet
he is following orders...
dont try to make this about obama and DONT YOU EVEN DARE try to make it about the FALSE left / right paradigm
Ok so we both don't trust, but you keep pointing to the "Truth" that this guy is spouting?double posting to explain to you tthis...
you dont trust politicians...
neither do i...
which is why its good to hear what they have to say...
where they are trying to lead the herd....
friends close, enemies closer...
KNOW your enemy, know what he is trying to push, know what he will try to stop
This is the Mental Illness we are suffering from here in America Wake up People...So then I take it you did not look up these and try to get the actual data?
Ok so we both don't trust, but you keep pointing to the "Truth" that this guy is spouting?
So again can or can't you tell me where you read this to see what the bill actually said?
He 1st was NOT reading the bill line for line. The first 6 videos had absolutely nothing said. It was just political grandstanding with the pompus bunch asking repeatedly a question that the lady on the chair (who was on Boehners side if you hadn't noticed) the same question that she couldn't answer.he is a representative in this country...
and he was reading the passages word for word....
i do not see anything in your summary about the federal government regulating ALL building codes,
your efficiency audits both before AND after you buy/sell a house
any time you make a home improvement you have to be audited for energy efficiency
the federal government decides what building materials must be used in the construction of houses
there is lines in that amendment that literally talk about helping companies outsource overseas... PAYING them to do it.................
this is going to create jobs?
And I replied:basically, from what i have gotten from han, is that there are certain parts of the bill he cant find
since he cant find them, he refuses to believe they exist...
i mean.... hannimal.....im calling you out with this question
did you even WATCH ANY SINGLE ONE of the youtube CSPAN videos.........(or was it CNN)
The thing is I have watched these many many times and know what they entail. It is all grandstanding and has very little actual real information in it. If you want to see the actual information watch the debates.Oh and no I did not watch those cnn videos. I have the ability to read and don't need to have peoples words when I cannot see what they are reading in the first place. Because I do not trust politicians, which I would think that your panic about everything Obama would understand.
That is because ALL would entail old homes. It is new buildings and commercial buildings, oh and it states that the general guidelines while being set at the fed level leaves the local for the actual regulations. And Boehner again just read a line and you took it as it was the truth.i do not see anything in your summary about the federal government regulating ALL building codes,
He said that he thought something meant that every home needs to have an effciency rating that are set by the local government (i.e city), but never said bill number on it. And you pulled the before and after you buy/sell out of your ass. I think that you are blending the building codes with the efficiency ratings. It is funny that you follow his gospel even when your making it up in your mind.your efficiency audits both before AND after you buy/sell a house
I think you may be talking about where he was saying that they will provide loans and grants to help people improve their water efficiency. There was a whole thing on all the programs they are setting up for people to bring their homes into the efficiencies that they want. Things like getting rid of a old ass dripping toilet and get a new one with less than a gallon tank so you don't wasate a ton of water. Sounds stupid unless you live in a state with water issues.any time you make a home improvement you have to be audited for energy efficiency
Very true. He actually said that they would be outlawing 'dangerous' cancer causing materials. He actually read that like it is a bad thing. You remember Asbestos? That is now band along with lead paint. If we find things that are not good for us I think it is perfectly reasonable to ban them don't you?the federal government decides what building materials must be used in the construction of houses
Watch it again and this time take your biased out and listen to the politician that you say you don't trust. He read a part that started to talk about loans given to companies and then move overseas. And abruptly stopped reading. Then he went on about how it was actually admitting that jobs will be lost and they will move overseas. He didn't even say that it was going to help them go overseas.there is lines in that amendment that literally talk about helping companies outsource overseas... PAYING them to do it
................ He is the Minority Leader That is why he got to talk... Pelosi in Da Box was kissing this same ladies ass. I don't see Boehner doing that.Jobs, jobs, jobs, and jobs.
[youtube]Ia2fYrP13wQ[/youtube]
You are such a wack-job................. He is the Minority Leader That is why he got to talk... Pelosi in Da Box was kissing this same ladies ass. I don't see Boehner doing that.
When you have obama's Stazi Squad busting down your door to do "Green Audits", or whatever they might call them. You were warned.
Of course many people here are probly already members.