Fletch: yes it is combined household income no one debates that not sure why you wanted to make that statement its always brought up in the meaning of a 2 income home when Republican bring it up so not sure where that was going.
1.Unimportant if she was adorable or ugly she was used as a pawn to lie and decieve the public. Yes many do this but Obama is a saint telling the truth to the people via transparency...so you agree he is decitful and a liar to make hiomself and his plan look better from his poiunt of view... A lie is a lie is a lie.
You act like I have said that Obama is not a politician. Way before you put on that stupid avatar that you think upsets people, I have said that Obama is a politician and should not be trusted, and will lie for his own ends. I just don't buy all the conspiracy garbage that keeps getting pushed. Since it is moslty bullshit. If you are stupid enough to think that there are not always handpicked people in the stands well then I am sorry that you are easily deceived.
2.Why should smokers be taxed on thier cigarettes? Why not thier insurance which they already are? I hate alcohol and people who drink are responsible for most vehiclular death so why not tax drivers who have a drink and then tax them for extra insurnace and then a hazard tax?..Its dumb I was a smoker but quiet 10 years ago but the taxes they are doing are outrageous and borderr line illegal as they do prevent the constitutional right ot persue life and happiness.
Congrats on quitting smoking. I would love to (smoke about 3 a day) but my fiance' is adicted to them so I do it to talk with her outside when she smokes.
There are taxes on liquor because of those very things you say. If the companies that provided alchohol and cigerettes paid for all the care that the people that use their products end up needing when they develope cancer or get into an accident then there would be no reason to tax them. But until they do we the people have to pick up their tab, and if people want to be destructive I am all for it, but they need to pay for it eventually, we should not be left with their bill when they leave the resturaunt of life.
3.This also shows how he is misrepresenting his statement of who gets taxed. Its not a direct tax but quietly increases the tax the middle class will have to pay on other areas that instead of a direct income tax hike will be spread around to hide the hikes to pay fro what he is doing..Again transparency basically a lie in disguise. Yes they all lie but Dems think Obama is honest and transparent but obviously he is not and this is one of his many decptions people dont see with thier blinders on because Obama didnt say it to them directly...again a lie is a lie is from a liar.
How can it be a lack of transperacy when he is talking about different ideas that he is thinking about doing, especially when it was one of the ones that WAS NOT USED. Transperancy is hiding things from the public, and that was an idea that he put out into the public to open the debate of what to do. It was an idea for health reform that was discarded early on.
People amaze me. You want transperancy but when you get it you use it as a way to say, see he is lying about this because look he said this here, when it is a totally different idea.
4.This post was using all the numbers Obamas adminstartion had put out there and then does the straigh caluclations showing the end results are not anything like what Obama is claiming. Its showing misinformation via no information. unless you actually take obamas oiwn numbers and do the math you dont see the actual figures but if you do it straight out his said ending figures are far far off from what he is saying.. again another lie from the transparent honest president.
Again you are mistaking one way to do something with the way that it must happen. I need to pay a bill. I can directly write a check, I can pay cash that I have in the house. I can use a credit card, I can open a tab, I can cut off the power, I can do some financing, ect. They are all means to an end, but using one doesn't mean that is how it has to be done. That link is a article that pretends to say that there is only one way to do something that the person that is doing it has repeatedly said he is not going to do.
These links were more on the lines of showing his dihonesty and non transparency which was ahuge part of his platform when he ran. Im working on getting a very current post on his tax revision plan so that its a day or 2 old so you dont go to the well thats from 2 months ago. i will post a very current one its harder to find prints of the radio and tv programs that report it but Ill find a print or youtube video showing the reports.
God please no youtube video, just need a link that shows Obama or his people saying that there will be a tax on the middle classes, that is not from a third party saying that is what he meant to say, and not from the election.