Oh Goodie! ... More on 911 (inside job) :)

[GrowRebel]

Bah it was just left over fireworks that employees kept in their desks from the previous 4th of July.

Obviously! What else could it be?

 

[fdd2blk]

Obviously! What else could it be?

explosives planted by our own government.

 

[what... huh?]

That's REALLY GAY!!!!

(so is this thread)


I guess my overactive participation in it should give my wife pause.

 

[GrowRebel]

you should start a thread. then everybody can learn.

I have ... it seems to stump everyone I've talked to about it. Even my friend who is one hell of a fine breeder can't figure it out. I need a specialist. Whoa ... you DO have a lot of posts.

explosives planted by our own government.

No ...

(so is this thread)

So what?
And what's up with the slightly pregnant woman?

You guys have seen the video with Russo talking about Nick Rockefeller before right?

 

[CrackerJax]

 

[GrowRebel]

Check it folks ... this one's number 5 right from their disinformation play book ...
5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth.
Number 9 fits too. How much do you want to bet the dummy looked through the play book before putting up the stupid picture. Bwaa ha ha ha ... they have to refer to their disinformation play book before they post.
Do you practices being an idiot or does it come naturally?

 

[what... huh?]

It is suggesting that what you are doing is disgraceful to the dead... not name calling. It demonstrates your excitement in desecrating the memories of the victims and first responders.

You don't have number for that.

It is the same point I made back around pg 50. It is the reason I bother to engage the more rational.

The subtlety is obviously lost on you... because you don't care about the dead. You care about slandering your government, and will commit any moral obscenity to do so.

 

[GrowRebel]

Folks jf put up a great post so I'm putting it up here for the record. Nice going jf

Fake Al Qaeda Actors EXPOSED! Adam Gadahn & Yousef al-Khattab
[youtube]GsUtvOW6SR0[/youtube]
I see other videos discussing the fake Al Qaeda ... I will check them out and post them if they are any good.

 

[CrackerJax]

It wasn't OBVIOUS enough for GR.... who can garner attention to himself (the goal) by copy/pasting non stop super sleuth detective work lol, but the NOT SO SUBTLE cartoon ELUDES him!!! Heh, GR reminds me of Gollum.........

 

[GrowRebel]

It is suggesting that what you are doing is disgraceful to the dead... not name calling.

What am I doing?

It demonstrates your excitement in desecrating the memories of the victims and first responders.

And this folks that I posted way back on page 37 post 365 are they desecrating the memories too?
[youtube]TzC3QI8JenU&feature=email[/youtube]

Now go take a course in "shut up"

You don't have number for that.

Oh no? Check it out folks this one is a number 2 .... number 2
2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used to show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the 'How dare you!' gambit.
See folks ... they get all their shit right from the disinformation play book ...

It is the same point I made back around pg 50. It is the reason I bother to engage the more rational.

Your bullshit don't fly with them either.

The subtlety is obviously lost on you...

Yeah ... stupidity and ignorance too.

because you don't care about the dead.

number 2 ... number 2 ...

You care about slandering your government, and will commit any moral obscenity to do so.

number 2 ... number 2 ...
I care about the truth ... and accountability ... you care about obstruction, disinformation, and protecting war criminals.

It wasn't OBVIOUS enough for GR....

It's pretty obvious to everyone except you deniers ... just another opportunity to make you guys look . Thanks!

who can garner attention to himself (the goal) by copy/pasting non stop super sleuth detective work

Yeah ... and it's way more than you could ever hope to accomplish ... number 18 ... number 18
18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'

but the NOT SO SUBTLE cartoon ELUDES him!!! Heh, GR reminds me of Gollum.........

Folks do you think she can post without referring to her disinformation play book. I doubt it.
... oh yeah ... and she continues to use number 1 and number 9
1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -- especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it's not reported, it didn't happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.
9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
We really got you assholes pegged now! Bwaa ha ha ha ha.

 

[what... huh?]

You are forced to feign nobility in your pursuit. You show victims of families, who listen to your stupid ass in times of grief and props them up there asking questions. Because you use this grief to stab at your government.


I am willing to bet pretty good money that this is not the only conspiracy theory you have against the government.


How many do you have? Make me a list of what people should be aware of that their government is doing... that is denied by the government.

 

[wyteboi]

You are forced to feign nobility in your pursuit. You show victims of families, who listen to your stupid ass in times of grief and props them up there asking questions. Because you use this grief to stab at your government.


I am willing to bet pretty good money that this is not the only conspiracy theory you have against the government.


How many do you have? Make me a list of what people should be aware of that their government is doing... that is denied by the government.

Aint there a bigger word for all the slandering you are doing? I dont give a fuc bout that but what I DO GIVE A FUCK ABOUT is history teachers are going to try an teach MY kids that fires melt steel and that a bunch of "gangs" knocked down Wtc buildings ??? C'mon ! HELL NO ... I will be in school that day to protest..... and if i go to jail then the kids in that class will NEVER forget the crazy man that came into school rantin an ravin bout how our own government blew those up! And just maybe a couple of them will want to know what really happened that day.... I am sorry ms. bigword but I REFUSE TO LET THEM TRY AND TEACH MY KIDS THAT CRAP!!! and the first time my kids jump on the welder with me then they will know just how hot it has to be to melt steel. If growreb popped in right now and said EVERYTHING he wrote in all those post were False, then i would call him a liar and devote myself to this thread......... no choice, someone has to do it!

KEEP IT UP REB!
u too drama!

 

[what... huh?]

I have shown, several times, steel melted by fire alone. To continue the "fire doesn't melt steel" rhetoric is just annoying at this stage.

 

[wyteboi]

I have shown, several times, steel melted by fire alone. To continue the "fire doesn't melt steel" rhetoric is just annoying at this stage.

SHOW ME PLEASE! of course fire can melt steel , but at what temp ? and how long do u have to "hold" that temp ?............. there is 1200 post on this thread u just point me there and im on it.

 

[what... huh?]

20 minutes. Vehicle fire. 6 4ft thick steel I beams.

 

[wyteboi]

never mind dont waste your time! you are defiantly a coverup dummy. Do they pay u for this shit? everything you say makes since .....BUT you are NOT open to suggestion. All of us ARE open for suggestion, but you are not suggesting NOTHING , only trying to prove us wrong!? The chances of all 3 of those buildings comin down like that ARE IMPOSSIBLE! I know fire weakens steel but weak steel is ALOT stronger then you are implicating. Weak steel bends easy , but not easy enough for all 3 buildings to fall at almost free fall speed (i didnt say faster than, i said ALMOST) I just cant believe they pay folks like you just to prove a bunch a potheads wrong.........You are sick ! you go ahead and let YOUR kids believe that shit. The friends i have that DO believe the official report dont have a big media telling them different so its not their fault they are ignorant. You though.... you know the truth and still refuse to believe? or you are paid. Either way alot of folks were murdered that day , and i dont know who done it, but i do know the official report is WAAAAAY OFF! and ever since that day , folks have made millions off this "war" ..................just plain sick


love a real american

 

[wyteboi]

20 minutes. Vehicle fire. 6 4ft thick steel I beams.

EXACTLY !! the beams are BENT, not gone or melted , come the fuck on , you can do better than that............cant you ? the concrete aint even broke WTF ???

 

[what... huh?]

Lol.

Try not to presume MY reason for disproving your assumptions.

20 minutes.

Did you notice the very large holes in the WTC's 1 & 2?

Did you notice the steel girders were no longer there?

Do you understand that the oppressive weight of the dozens of floors above were now shifted, and intense fire raged across several floors for much longer than 20 minutes around the remaining overstressed steel? Do you have any idea what 20+ floors an acre each weighs? MASSIVE forces at work here... unlike any in history.

Did you notice that WTC 1&2 collapsed from the top down, unlike any demo in history... without the concussive explosions associated in EVERY demo you will ever find?


Keep lying to yourself... I don't give a shit... but don't presume WHY I debunk.


So you accept now that fire melts steel I take it. Awesome. We can now move from there.

 

[wyteboi]

We will never see pics close enough to see explosives (except the ones that are already out there)
So which one is it ? Did they implode "unlike any other demo" OR did it burn "unlike any other building in history" ? (3 times in one day) Now u are with me!

 

[what... huh?]

I never suggested they turned to liquid. I suggested they failed... with 20 floors an acre wide above them.


The absence of them is due to the impact of hundreds of thousands of pounds slamming into it at 600 mph.


You- "Fire doesn't melt steel, prove it"

Me- shows you evidence of that fact with folded melted steel ibeams from 20 minutes of fire.

You- "you're a dummy"


And I can do better? Please. Tell me I was in on it now. Tell me I work for the Bush administration.