The people behind the Health Care Plan

Parker

Well-Known Member
I didn't write it but I like it.

Congress is going to pass a health care plan:

Written by a committee whose head says he doesn't understand it,
passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, but exempts themselves from it,
signed by a president that also hasn't read it, and who smokes,
with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes,
overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and
financed by a country that's nearly broke.
 

doobnVA

Well-Known Member
You do realize there are several different "plans", don't you? The senate finance bill isn't the only bill.

How do you know nobody in Congress has read it? THEY WROTE THESE BILLS! They've proposed amendments to the bills! Of course they've read the bills. Sheesh.
 

Parker

Well-Known Member
You do realize there are several different "plans", don't you? The senate finance bill isn't the only bill.

How do you know nobody in Congress has read it? THEY WROTE THESE BILLS! They've proposed amendments to the bills! Of course they've read the bills. Sheesh.

Why comment on something you don't know about it just makes you look foolish. I bet you support Congresscrooks like Dodd.
"A provision was tucked into this year's economic stimulus bill in last-minute, closed-door talks that allowed insurance giant American International Group to pay huge executive bonuses."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091009/ap_on_go_co/us_health_care_plain_english_6

1,017 pages

"The minutiae of legal drafting is not necessarily related to understanding the concepts in the bill," said Rep. Earl Pomeroy, D-N.D., who certainly has had his hand in writing laws in nearly 20 years in the House.
"You could literally get lost in the forest for the trees" trying to read it, he said."

"A few weeks ago, the openness issue occupied the Senate Finance Committee for a good portion of a day's work on its health overhaul bill.
Unlike other committees, the Finance panel has traditionally worked from plain English — called conceptual language — rather than legislative text. The reasoning, in part, is that its issues are so abstruse — involving IRS code and other complex items — that some senators argue it's the only practical way to proceed.

Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., sought to prove that point by reading at some length from the bill's legislative text. "By striking amounts for purposes and inserting amounts" and "IV, for 2013, the sum of AA, one-third of the quotient of AA," he said.
Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., replied that Conrad had been talking about a home health care provision that he said had caused a lot of problems.
Conrad corrected him. It was a provision on Medicare managed care plans.
 

doobnVA

Well-Known Member
Why comment on something you don't know about it just makes you look foolish. I bet you support Congresscrooks like Dodd.
"A provision was tucked into this year's economic stimulus bill in last-minute, closed-door talks that allowed insurance giant American International Group to pay huge executive bonuses."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091009/ap_on_go_co/us_health_care_plain_english_6

1,017 pages

"The minutiae of legal drafting is not necessarily related to understanding the concepts in the bill," said Rep. Earl Pomeroy, D-N.D., who certainly has had his hand in writing laws in nearly 20 years in the House.
"You could literally get lost in the forest for the trees" trying to read it, he said."

"A few weeks ago, the openness issue occupied the Senate Finance Committee for a good portion of a day's work on its health overhaul bill.
Unlike other committees, the Finance panel has traditionally worked from plain English — called conceptual language — rather than legislative text. The reasoning, in part, is that its issues are so abstruse — involving IRS code and other complex items — that some senators argue it's the only practical way to proceed.

Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., sought to prove that point by reading at some length from the bill's legislative text. "By striking amounts for purposes and inserting amounts" and "IV, for 2013, the sum of AA, one-third of the quotient of AA," he said.
Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., replied that Conrad had been talking about a home health care provision that he said had caused a lot of problems.
Conrad corrected him. It was a provision on Medicare managed care plans.
We are talking about the senate finance committee health care bill, not the stimulus bill.

Congress has been debating this bill for months. You don't think any of them have read it?


I'd say that makes YOU look pretty foolish.
 

Parker

Well-Known Member
We are talking about the senate finance committee health care bill, not the stimulus bill.

Congress has been debating this bill for months. You don't think any of them have read it?


I'd say that makes YOU look pretty foolish.
I gave you an example of Congress not reading bills. Like the saying goes you can lead a jackass to water but you can't make her drink.
 

doobnVA

Well-Known Member
I gave you an example of Congress not reading bills. Like the saying goes you can lead a jackass to water but you can't make her drink.
Your example does not apply to THIS BILL.

Have you not been watching the legislators debate this bill? They have read it if they know what's in it well enough to debate it, no?

Have YOU read it?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
I didn't write it but I like it.

Congress is going to pass a health care plan:

Written by a committee whose head says he doesn't understand it,
passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, but exempts themselves from it,
signed by a president that also hasn't read it, and who smokes,
with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes,
overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and
financed by a country that's nearly broke.
Nice. Don't forget some people that don't want it and won't use it will be forced to pay for it too.
 

Mcgician

Well-Known Member
This health care plan is going to be a joke.
Agreed, but the truth of the matter is, it has little to actually do with getting people the healthcare/treatment they need, but is entirely about CONTROL. Centralizing the control is paramount to the socialist agenda, and healthcare is/has long been the easiest way to propagandize the idiot masses into it.
 

undertheice

Well-Known Member
You do realize there are several different "plans", don't you?
only one can be enacted into law and that one will be so perverted by political agenda as to be nearly useless. filled with last minute demands and agenda driven pork by the likes of reid and pelosi, we can count on a bill so far removed from reality that it will be unrecognizable when compared to any previous drafts. regardless of the wishes of the people, it will contain such nonsense as an easily corrupted public option, under the control of government's petty bureaucrats and so badly managed it will soon become as much of a drag on the economy as the rest of the liberal establishment's do-nothing social programs. it will provide positions for millions of new government bureaucrats, spending their days inventing hoops for us to jump through and creating their petty fiefdoms. it will serve to expand an already bloated government payroll and place millions more american citizens and businesses more firmly under the thumb of the state. it will create a new avenue of waste and a source of funds for the totally unrelated pet projects of any politician or special interest group with their hand out. it won't reduce what corruption does exist in the insurance industry or do anything about the waste built into existing government run health programs, though i'm sure they will make that claim and invent statistics to prove what a good job they are doing of it. and finally; it will serve only to expand the welfare state and its accompanying culture of entitlement and it won't be in the best interests of the people or that of the nation.

how do we know all this? because we've been paying attention. we've watched as, under the guise of national security, our government has pushed through legislation that serves mainly to expand the bureaucracy's power over the individual and limit our freedoms whenever they deem it necessary. we've watched as, driven by the urgency of our economic meltdown, our government has instituted a series of stimulus and bailout packages that stimulate only the salivary glands of power hungry political animals, seeking to expand their spheres of influence, and bail out only selected institutions, giving them the capacity to further consolidate the country's financial power and invest it in a few corporations and special interest groups beholden to the liberal establishment. we are now watching as, pressed by the imaginary demands of a so-called broken system, another huge chunk of our economy is being placed in the hands of the very people who have been incapable of regulating it in the first place. the happy (or is it unhappy?) coincidence of all these emergencies isn't lost on anyone with more than two brain cells to rub together. our unresponsive representatives know how little time they have, once their power grabbing schemes are made public, to pass the necessary legislation, before the people realize how their rights are being eroded and their freedoms lost. we've been watching it all and we are no longer amused.

who is this "we" i've been talking about? we are the individual. we have reveled in the protections granted us by the constitution and the promise of self-determination guaranteed us by founders of this nation. we come from a number of different backgrounds. some of us were revolutionaries and others were complacent wage slaves. we are true liberals and true conservatives (not those lackeys of the totalitarian regime or the posers of the religious right), rich and poor, we come in all colors, shapes and sizes. we run the political spectrum, but we are not willing to blindly follow any corrupted leadership down the road to their orwellian wet dreams. i've lost count of the number of folks i've watched drop completely off the grid, their contributions lost to the society at large. i've given up hoping there will be some end to the businesses forced to close by inane restrictions or obliged to move their concerns to more favorable climes, fleeing the intrusion of nanny state taxation and constraint. i'm tired of contemplating a rather bleak future, where government has become the parent to the herd and we all live peacefully in our comfortable poverty.





i know, i know. i started rambling somewhere down the line, but you've got to give me a bit of a break. i started this damn post over an hour ago and i just don't seem to be able to avoid the intrusions. start and stop, start and stop, start and stop. i can't type out more than a couple of sentences without the real world demanding my attention. hey, at least i managed to get eveyting speelt curektly.
 

Parker

Well-Known Member
Your example does not apply to THIS BILL.

Have you not been watching the legislators debate this bill? They have read it if they know what's in it well enough to debate it, no?

Have YOU read it?
YOU are clueless. The post was about congress not reading and understanding the bill. I even showed you one example of a congress member not understanding it. Members of Congress have made the same comments I have. Did YOU read the article in the link?
 

Green Cross

Well-Known Member
They don't have to understand the Bill in order to profit from it.

From USA today (a liberal ragsheet but accurate in this article):

"WASHINGTON — When Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley staged a $1,000-per-person fundraiser at a Capitol Hill restaurant in June, insurance company Aflac helped to host.
Later that week, lobbyists for physicians' groups attended a fundraiser for Rep. George Miller, D-Calif.

TABLE: Health industry donations to lawmakers"

Table:
SenateAlexander, LamarRTenn.Health, Ed., Labor, Pensions$5,000$12,800$17,800
HouseAltmire, JasonDPa.Education & Labor$35,550$29,523$65,073
HouseAndrews, RobertDN.J.Education & Labor$9,000$10,600$19,600
HouseBaldwin, TammyDWis.Energy & Commerce$6,500$4,050$10,550
HouseBarrow, JohnDGa.Energy & Commerce$16,500$12,900$29,400
HouseBarton, JoeRTexasEnergy & Commerce$15,900$52,500$68,400
SenateBaucus, MaxDMont.Finance$86,500$34,500$121,000
HouseBecerra, XavierDCalif.Ways & Means$76,900$49,727$126,627
HouseBerkley, ShelleyDNev.Ways & Means$25,850$29,250$55,100
HouseBiggert, JudyRIll.Education & Labor$4,700$6,000$10,700
SenateBingaman, JeffDN.M.Health, Ed., Labor, Pensions$2,000$0$2,000
HouseBishop, RobRUtahEducation & Labor$2,000$0$2,000
HouseBishop, TimothyDN.Y.Education & Labor$10,400$2,000$12,400
HouseBlackburn, MarshaRTenn.Energy & Commerce$14,750$14,929$29,679
HouseBlumenauer, EarlDOre.Ways & Means$12,500$23,000$35,500
HouseBlunt, RoyRMo.Energy & Commerce$45,800$88,700$134,500
HouseBono Mack, MaryRCalif.Energy & Commerce$14,600$4,800$19,400
HouseBoucher, RickDVa.Energy & Commerce$5,000$-1,000$4,000
HouseBoustany, CharlesRLa.Ways & Means$46,450$16,250$62,700
HouseBrady, KevinRTexasWays & Means$9,000$1,000$10,000
HouseBraley, BruceDIowaEnergy & Commerce$17,000$36,000$53,000
SenateBrown, SherrodDOhioHealth, Ed., Labor, Pensions$40,250$81,482$121,732
HouseBrown-Waite, GinnyRFla.Ways & Means$3,000$12,250$15,250
SenateBunning, JimRKy.Finance$23,150$28,350$51,500
HouseBurgess, MichaelRTexasEnergy & Commerce$29,400$49,250$78,650
SenateBurr, RichardRN.C.Health, Ed., Labor, Pensions$74,550$85,600$160,150
HouseButterfield, G.K.DN.C.Energy & Commerce$5,500$12,000$17,500
HouseBuyer, SteveRInd.Energy & Commerce$5,500$13,750$19,250
HouseCamp, DaveRMich.Ways & Means$42,500$54,750$97,250
HouseCantor, EricRVa.Ways & Means$103,050$96,500$199,550
SenateCantwell, MariaDWash.Finance$11,250$0$11,250
HouseCapps, LoisDCalif.Energy & Commerce$12,500$33,650$46,150
SenateCarper, TomDDel.Finance$35,040$30,150$65,190
SenateCasey, RobertDPa.Health, Ed., Labor, Pensions$10,250$21,900$32,150
HouseCassidy, BillRLa.Education & Labor$36,250$24,150$60,400
HouseCastle, MikeRDel.Education & Labor$12,500$8,500$21,000
HouseCastor, KathyDFla.Energy & Commerce$4,950$8,900$13,850
DelegateChristensen, DonnaDV.I.Energy & Commerce$11,819$7,000$18,819
HouseClarke, YvetteDN.Y.Education & Labor$7,550$6,000$13,550
SenateCoburn, TomROkla.Health, Ed., Labor, Pensions$8,000$44,390$52,390
SenateConrad, KentDN.D.Finance$11,000$25,500$36,500
SenateCornyn, JohnRTexasFinance$20,250$30,500$50,750
HouseCourtney, JoeDConn.Education & Labor$8,750$9,500$18,250
SenateCrapo, MikeRIdahoFinance$21,000$13,750$34,750
HouseCrowley, JosephDN.Y.Ways & Means$46,850$54,072$100,922
HouseDavis, ArturDAla.Ways & Means$9,800$-2,000$7,800
HouseDavis, DannyDIll.Ways & Means$9,500$14,900$24,400
HouseDavis, GeoffRKy.Ways & Means$38,350$20,550$58,900
HouseDavis, SusanDCalif.Education & Labor$4,444$1,000$5,444
HouseDeal, NathanRGa.Energy & Commerce$29,023$1,500$30,523
HouseDeGette, DianaDColo.Energy & Commerce$25,900$20,000$45,900
HouseDingell, JohnDMich.Energy & Commerce$22,000$20,000$42,000
SenateDodd, ChrisDConn.Health, Ed., Labor, Pensions$45,500$85,620$131,120
HouseDoggett, LloydDTexasWays & Means$66,425$1,750$68,175
HouseDoyle, MikeDPa.Energy & Commerce$3,500$2,500$6,000
HouseEhlers, VernonRMich.Education & Labor$3,550$3,100$6,650
HouseEngel, EliotDN.Y.Energy & Commerce$6,000$12,500$18,500
SenateEnsign, JohnRNev.Finance$31,250$8,000$39,250
SenateEnzi, MikeRWyo.Health, Ed., Labor, Pensions$9,000$7,000$16,000
HouseEshoo, AnnaDCalif.Energy & Commerce$43,500$31,900$75,400
HouseEtheridge, BobDN.C.Ways & Means$13,250$28,200$41,450
HouseFudge, MarciaDOhioEducation & Labor$1,000$9,900$10,900
HouseGingrey, PhilRGa.Energy & Commerce$9,200$53,400$62,600
HouseGonzalez, CharlesDTexasEnergy & Commerce$3,000$13,150$16,150
HouseGordon, BartDTenn.Energy & Commerce$2,000$19,250$21,250
SenateGrassley, ChuckRIowaFinance$53,200$125,800$179,000
HouseGreen, GeneDTexasEnergy & Commerce$2,500$20,000$22,500
HouseGrijalva, RaulDAriz.Education & Labor$3,000$0$3,000
HouseGuthrie, BrettRKy.Education & Labor$17,000$24,950$41,950
SenateHagan, KayDN.C.Health, Ed., Labor, Pensions$27,500$7,500$35,000
HouseHall, RalphRTexasEnergy & Commerce$6,000$8,950$14,950
HouseHare, PhilDIll.Education & Labor$4,500$11,000$15,500
SenateHarkin, TomDIowaHealth, Ed., Labor, Pensions$19,750$28,000$47,750
HouseHarman, JaneDCalif.Energy & Commerce$1,750$2,000$3,750
SenateHatch, OrrinRUtahHealth, Ed., Labor, Pensions$58,100$77,052$135,152
HouseHeller, DeanRNev.Ways & Means$2,500$13,200$15,700
HouseHerger, WallyRCalif.Ways & Means$11,300$17,000$28,300
HouseHiggins, BrianDN.Y.Ways & Means$19,300$8,400$27,700
HouseHill, BaronDInd.Energy & Commerce$25,000$17,956$42,956
HouseHinojosa, RubenDTexasEducation & Labor$4,000$1,000$5,000
HouseHirono, MazieDHawaiiEducation & Labor$1,000$7,750$8,750
HouseHoekstra, PeterRMich.Education & Labor$2,000$0$2,000
HouseHolt, RushDN.J.Education & Labor$0$2,250$2,250
HouseHunter, DuncanRCalif.Education & Labor$3,500$6,000$9,500
HouseInslee, JayDWash.Energy & Commerce$7,250$22,300$29,550
SenateIsakson, JohnnyRGa.Health, Ed., Labor, Pensions$34,850$41,550$76,400
HouseJohnson, SamRTexasWays & Means$250$15,200$15,450
SenateKennedy, EdwardDMass.Health, Ed., Labor, Pensions$4,300$-1,000$3,300
SenateKerry, JohnDMass.Finance$5,400$7,500$12,900
HouseKildee, DaleDMich.Education & Labor$2,000$6,000$8,000
HouseKind, RonDWis.Ways & Means$29,069$39,085$68,154
HouseKline, JohnRMinn.Education & Labor$2,250$6,850$9,100
HouseKucinich, DennisDOhioEducation & Labor$1,750$0$1,750
SenateKyl, JonRAriz.Finance$33,500$10,000$43,500
HouseLarson, JohnDConn.Ways & Means$15,500$56,823$72,323
HouseLevin, SandyDMich.Ways & Means$19,000$12,300$31,300
HouseLewis, JohnDGa.Ways & Means$10,750$1,250$12,000
SenateLincoln, BlancheDArk.Finance$220,850$104,500$325,350
HouseLoebsack, DaveDIowaEducation & Labor$7,000$8,750$15,750
HouseMarkey, EdDMass.Energy & Commerce$2,000$1,000$3,000
HouseMatheson, JimDUtahEnergy & Commerce$52,749$14,000$66,749
HouseMatsui, DorisDCalif.Energy & Commerce$7,500$2,250$9,750
SenateMcCain, JohnRAriz.Health, Ed., Labor, Pensions$4,550$18,205$22,755
HouseMcCarthy, CarolynDN.Y.Education & Labor$11,650$21,650$33,300
HouseMcClintock, TomRCalif.Education & Labor$2,450$1,000$3,450
HouseMcDermott, JimDWash.Ways & Means$12,000$3,000$15,000
HouseMcKeon, BuckRCalif.Education & Labor$5,750$5,950$11,700
HouseMcMorris Rodgers, CathyRWash.Education & Labor$2,750$8,500$11,250
HouseMcNerney, JerryDCalif.Energy & Commerce$12,800$13,050$25,850
HouseMeek, KendrickDFla.Ways & Means$121,000$76,100$197,100
HouseMelancon, CharlieDLa.Energy & Commerce$10,900$26,364$37,264
SenateMenendez, RobertDN.J.Finance$0$18,900$18,900
SenateMerkley, JeffDOre.Health, Ed., Labor, Pensions$15,250$3,750$19,000
SenateMikulski, BarbaraDMd.Health, Ed., Labor, Pensions$59,474$42,900$102,374
HouseMiller, GeorgeDCalif.Education & Labor$10,000$14,270$24,270
SenateMurkowski, LisaRAlaskaHealth, Ed., Labor, Pensions$21,150$20,500$41,650
HouseMurphy, ChrisDConn.Energy & Commerce$41,850$8,750$50,600
HouseMurphy, TimRPa.Energy & Commerce$28,800$32,900$61,700
SenateMurray, PattyDWash.Health, Ed., Labor, Pensions$108,800$72,900$181,700
HouseMyrick, SueRN.C.Energy & Commerce$950$6,750$7,700
HouseNeal, RichardDMass.Ways & Means$15,000$31,000$46,000
SenateNelson, BillDFla.Finance$9,000$17,300$26,300
HouseNunes, DevinRCalif.Ways & Means$1,200$23,000$24,200
HousePallone, FrankDN.J.Energy & Commerce$28,750$140,600$169,350
HousePascrell, BillDN.J.Ways & Means$32,550$25,700$58,250
HousePayne, DonaldDN.J.Education & Labor$1,000$12,000$13,000
HousePetri, TomRWis.Education & Labor$200$4,150$4,350
DelegatePierluisi, PedroDP.R.Education & Labor$3,500$250$3,750
HousePitts, JoeRPa.Energy & Commerce$11,000$7,000$18,000
HousePlatts, ToddRPa.Education & Labor$11,200$1,000$12,200
HousePolis, JaredDColo.Education & Labor$2,000$-1,000$1,000
HousePomeroy, EarlDN.D.Ways & Means$59,035$48,950$107,985
HousePrice, TomRGa.Education & Labor$46,650$98,200$144,850
HouseRadanovich, GeorgeRCalif.Energy & Commerce$3,500$2,500$6,000
HouseRangel, CharlesDN.Y.Ways & Means$54,700$41,600$96,300
SenateReed, JackDR.I.Health, Ed., Labor, Pensions$250$500$750
HouseReichert, DaveRWash.Ways & Means$15,700$12,740$28,440
SenateRoberts, PatRKan.Health, Ed., Labor, Pensions$14,000$7,000$21,000
SenateRockefeller, JayDW.Va.Finance$2,000$18,500$20,500
HouseRoe, PhilRTenn.Education & Labor$0$25,200$25,200
HouseRogers, MikeRMich.Energy & Commerce$29,750$59,850$89,600
HouseRoskam, PeterRIll.Ways & Means$12,750$13,900$26,650
HouseRoss, MikeDArk.Energy & Commerce$32,250$53,350$85,600
HouseRush, BobbyDIll.Energy & Commerce$2,000$3,500$5,500
HouseRyan, PaulRWis.Ways & Means$16,050$33,605$49,655
HouseSanchez, LindaDCalif.Ways & Means$14,000$13,650$27,650
SenateSanders, BernieIVt.Health, Ed., Labor, Pensions$1,000$11,500$12,500
HouseSarbanes, JohnDMd.Energy & Commerce$2,000$2,900$4,900
HouseScalise, SteveRLa.Energy & Commerce$24,300$12,400$36,700
HouseSchakowsky, JanDIll.Energy & Commerce$22,900$23,350$46,250
SenateSchumer, CharlesDN.Y.Finance$139,850$117,550$257,400
HouseSchwartz, AllysonDPa.Ways & Means$69,673$45,773$115,446
HouseScott, BobbyDVa.Education & Labor$2,300$250$2,550
HouseSestak, JoeDPa.Education & Labor$21,439$24,150$45,589
HouseShadegg, JohnRAriz.Energy & Commerce$9,250$6,700$15,950
HouseShea-Porter, CarolDN.H.Education & Labor$1,000$0$1,000
HouseShimkus, JohnRIll.Energy & Commerce$20,975$16,750$37,725
SenateSnowe, OlympiaRMaineFinance$8,500$1,000$9,500
HouseSouder, MarkRInd.Education & Labor$4,750$9,250$14,000
HouseSpace, ZackDOhioEnergy & Commerce$27,769$16,950$44,719
SenateStabenow, DebbieDMich.Finance$26,900$111,340$138,240
HouseStark, PeteDCalif.Ways & Means$30,251$1,500$31,751
HouseStearns, CliffRFla.Energy & Commerce$3,000$4,350$7,350
HouseStupak, BartDMich.Energy & Commerce$12,000$2,400$14,400
HouseSullivan, JohnROkla.Energy & Commerce$9,500$8,750$18,250
HouseSutton, BettyDOhioEnergy & Commerce$4,000$17,250$21,250
HouseTanner, JohnDTenn.Ways & Means$25,500$20,900$46,400
HouseTerry, LeeRNeb.Energy & Commerce$13,000$8,659$21,659
HouseThompson, GlennRPa.Education & Labor$5,000$8,000$13,000
HouseThompson, MikeDCalif.Ways & Means$47,000$20,250$67,250
HouseTiberi, PatrickROhioWays & Means$13,000$22,750$35,750
HouseTierney, JohnDMass.Education & Labor$-1,000$3,000$2,000
HouseTitus, DinaDNev.Education & Labor$14,200$17,150$31,350
HouseTonko, PaulDN.Y.Education & Labor$6,750$0$6,750
HouseUpton, FredRMich.Energy & Commerce$20,750$6,500$27,250
HouseVan Hollen, ChrisDMd.Ways & Means$31,500$24,850$56,350
HouseWalden, GregROre.Energy & Commerce$15,000$21,650$36,650
HouseWaxman, HenryDCalif.Energy & Commerce$38,950$67,600$106,550
HouseWeiner, AnthonyDN.Y.Energy & Commerce$2,000$1,000$3,000
HouseWelch, PeterDVt.Energy & Commerce$2,000$3,500$5,500
HouseWhitfield, EdRKy.Energy & Commerce$34,800$25,800$60,600
HouseWilson, JoeRS.C.Education & Labor$19,250$15,000$34,250
HouseWoolsey, LynnDCalif.Education & Labor$2,500$9,425$11,925
HouseWu, DavidDOre.Education & Labor$7,000$0$7,000
SenateWyden, RonDOre.Finance$93,750$127,700$221,450
HouseYarmuth, JohnDKy.Ways & Means$33,950$28,500$62,450
 

redivider

Well-Known Member
Agreed, but the truth of the matter is, it has little to actually do with getting people the healthcare/treatment they need, but is entirely about CONTROL. Centralizing the control is paramount to the socialist agenda, and healthcare is/has long been the easiest way to propagandize the idiot masses into it.
this is about as fear-mongering, glen beck-induced, uneducated piece of propaganda bullshit I have ever read.

you need to get out more...
 

fitch303

Well-Known Member
the documents which founded this country and gave us all our rights were a handful of pages, why the hell is this healcare bill so long?
 

undertheice

Well-Known Member
the documents which founded this country and gave us all our rights were a handful of pages, why the hell is this healthcare bill so long?
because those documents weren't giving us anything, merely acknowledging the natural rights of man and limiting them to encourage the formation of a workable society. this bill is inventing an entirely new set of rights and determining which of our former rights to eliminate in order to pay for the whole mess.
 

ChChoda

Well-Known Member
because those documents weren't giving us anything, merely acknowledging the natural rights of man and limiting them to encourage the formation of a workable society. this bill is inventing an entirely new set of rights and determining which of our former rights to eliminate in order to pay for the whole mess.
hear, hear! bongsmilie
 

amv

Active Member
lets forget about healthcare right now and worry about the foreclosures that are literally ruining this country, what good is having health insurance if you have no place to live. I dont know what Obama is thinking, help keep people in their homes first then work on health issues altough the government already in charge of social security , medicare ,medicaid and all of these programs are either messed up or bankrupted so why not add healthcare to the mix of b.s. and everybody here knows that 99.9% of poloticians are no different then a crook other than that they dont where a mask.
 

ViRedd

New Member
Anyone want to take a stab at this question?: If our representatives in the Congress haven't read the bill ... who wrote it?
 
Top