Is Obama competent?

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
Maybe I see things differently:

I would rather him not salute a flag that he does not honor and salute a fallen soldier than vise versa.
If you see things differently, great.

My comment was not over the flag. That particular campaign issue was well over a year ago and he was elected anyway. Please note that I did not bring up the flag issue at all.

I did bring up the point that having a camera there was not a good idea. In fact, it was tacky. Especially if he refuses to act on Afghanistan until after next week's election.

He want's to salute the fallen in a flag-draped coffin. Super! But ask the press to leave the cameras behind if they wish to accompany you for your private moment.
 

Cloud City

New Member
Read these posts and look at all the HATE these right minded folks have toward other citizens expressing their opinions. You people are personally assaulting those who disagree with your little forum cult. Leave the personal character out of it, no one is running for election here. Additionally, we all know how effective Rove-esque politics were in the last election. You guys don't wanna lose more debates do you?




The conversation is still entertaining me. It's like watching O'Riely except you can't interrupt the oppositions sentences before they're done.

Many of them suffer symptoms of severe ODS - Obama Derangement Syndrome. Some of these lower class people nowadays who call themselves Conservative make me ashamed to be a far right Conservative.
 
It's all George Bush's fault!!!!
And here we go ! (And for those that said you were for Bush - You just admitted it's all his fault ! (LOL)

So what's the big, fat, hair'y problem with your enemies? Don't they believe a single word you say?
And they won't believe the above quote either will they?

Such smartie pants! All three of them.

LOL Have a good November!
Justine

Oh, and 'how long have you been working for FOX News'???
 
It's a simple question which has been coming up more and more....

Is Obama competent?

Obama has failed at every policy endeavor so far.

Health care is sinking his Presidency
Obama tax schemes are causing a meltdown of confidence in business and the hope of the nation
Russia has played Obama like a fiddle
Two wars fester without a commander in chief at the helm. (troops, what troops?)


Here's just a small example of the latest blunder.... one of biblical proportions. Iran is basically GIVEN the bomb under the tacit permission of Obama, who just two weeks ago at the UN declared he was going to rid the world of nukes (who's he kidding...other then himself?_
========================================================

Russia "Dupes" United Nations and President Obama on Iranian Scheme

Posted by Michael James Stone

Iran wins six-power legitimacy for uranium enrichment - contrary to UN resolutions

DEBKAfile Special Report

October 5, 2009, 5:41 PM (GMT+02:00)
Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov

Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov

If Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov is to be believed, Iran came out of its first diplomatic engagement with the big powers flushed with success. Not only has Tehran gained international legitimacy for its enriched uranium program - contrary to UN Security Council resolutions - but third-nation help is on tap for reaching a higher grade of enrichment.

Monday, Oct. 5, Lavrov let the cat out of the bag when he said in Vienna that an agreement reached between Tehran and six world powers last week for Russia to help enrich uranium for an Iranian reactor had yet to be finalized.

He said experts would meet soon to implement the plan, after the IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei stated in Tehran Sunday that the experts would meet in Vienna Oct. 19 to discuss the deal for Russia to take some of Iran's processed uranium and enrich it further.

The Russian minister referred to "an Iranian reactor," whereas the IAEA chief spoke of enriched uranium to be reprocessed abroad "for use as medical isotopes." Visitors are shown around a small medical reactor in Tehran to demonstrate that its nuclear program is innocuous although Western intelligence believes it to be a link in Iran's covert plutonium bomb project.

The plan to be cleared in Vienna is for the transfer of Iran's stock of uranium enriched to 3-5 percent to Russia where it would be further reprocessed to 19.75 percent. Former US ambassador to the UN John Bolton explained Monday that this level "is barely under the 20 percent definition of weapons-grade" uranium.

None of the representatives of the big powers attending last Thursday's meeting with the Iranian negotiator Saeed Jalili last Thursday, Oct. 1, revealed that Russia's helping hand would effectively jump-start Iran to cover the distance to 90 percent enrichment in no more than a week or two.

The Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Hassan Ghashghavi was perfectly correct when he said there has been no change in his government's "nuclear stance" as a result of the Geneva conference. Not only has Iran not given an inch, but it is presenting the conference and the IAEA chief's visit as "Western acknowledgement of its right to pursue civil nuclear technology including enrichment."

The harsh sanctions hanging over Iran's head have melted away. Indeed, Tehran is effectively off the hook of past sanctions which punished it for pursuing a banned enrichment program.

Furthermore, Moscow will boost enriched uranium stocks four to fivefold.

If the Vienna meeting on Oct. 19 approves this arrangement, it will cut the ground from under any US or Israeli demands for further UN sanctions. It is therefore hard to understand why the Israeli government headed by Binyamin Netanyahu has not spoken up in protest against a deal which shortens Iran's road to a nuclear weapon.

Ya no. I think the U.S. should just say "Fuck the rest of the world. LETS PRACTICE ISOLATIONISM AGAIN!!!" Seriously. Let it either be isolationism or imperialism.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Ready to pay off all your foreign debt? It's far too late to retract now, except as a perpetual third world nation.
 
Ummm. No. Like I said.

"Fuck the rest of the world. LETS PRACTICE ISOLATIONISM AGAIN!!!"

Fuck, the rest, of the world. Dude Look At All The Global wars. It's the U.S. that was the deciding factor. WW2 is the premier example.
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member
Well it appears quite obvious to me that Mr. Obama is in way over his head.
His administration is apparently woefully inept. His solution to the two big current problems is simply to throw gigantic buckets of fuel onto the bonfire.

This glaring flaw in not unique to Obama, ineptitude has pervaded every level of Government: State, Local and Federal.
:leaf:

Peggy Noonan writes eloquently about this in her recent WSJ article.
I think she is on to something here.
This makes me profoundly sad and angry.
Here is an excerpt:


When I see those in government, both locally and in Washington, spend and tax and come up each day with new ways to spend and tax—health care, cap and trade, etc.—I think: Why aren't they worried about the impact of what they're doing? Why do they think America is so strong it can take endless abuse?
I think I know part of the answer. It is that they've never seen things go dark. They came of age during the great abundance, circa 1980-2008 (or 1950-2008, take your pick), and they don't have the habit of worry. They talk about their "concerns"—they're big on that word. But they're not really concerned. They think America is the goose that lays the golden egg. Why not? She laid it in their laps. She laid it in grandpa's lap.
They don't feel anxious, because they never had anything to be anxious about. They grew up in an America surrounded by phrases—"strongest nation in the world," "indispensable nation," "unipolar power," "highest standard of living"—and are not bright enough, or serious enough, to imagine that they can damage that, hurt it, even fatally.
We are governed at all levels by America's luckiest children, sons and daughters of the abundance, and they call themselves optimists but they're not optimists—they're unimaginative. They don't have faith, they've just never been foreclosed on. They are stupid and they are callous, and they don't mind it when people become disheartened. They don't even notice.

Full piece:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703363704574503631430926354.html

----------------------------------------------------
Of course this begs the question as to whether Obama is fully aware of the destructive consequences of his misguided policies...Could his true intent be to actually destroy the USA?????
I am beginning to wonder, but this is a topic for another thread
 

CrackerJax

New Member
I read that yesterday... I thought the part about the executive saying bunches of his friends are already quitting was poignant. What Obama and the lib's don't realize is that ppl don't have to work.... lots of my friends have done so, lots of money has left US shores already...... the idea ppl are being reduced...... brain drain.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Yah, I didn't vote for Pres in Bush/Gore since both were not quality. I voted for Bush when he ran against Kerry, because I don't like changing commanders in the middle of a war. Plus Kerry is an idiot....that didn't help. Then back again to no vote for Pres. with Obama/Mccain, since both were terrible choices.

McCain however would not have gone on a spending binge for the public sector in the middle of a financial crisis. :roll:
 
Top