Professor Puff.n.Tuff
Active Member
Alls I can tell you is that when history repeats itself you end up with similar results. I appreciate prop 215, but I think a lot of people have suffered because of the neglects discussed in my previous post.
To PASS, or NOT, or not YET!!!
- Thread starter Professor Puff.n.Tuff
- Start date
Professor Puff.n.Tuff
Active Member
Keenly2
Active Member
explain how im selfish... oh thats right you cant, your just throwing it around
your the one who, in an attempt to make everyone else do the same thing you did, want to keep the consumption of weed illegal for the majority
because you feel the need to be in the special minority
sorry, but in no way can i be called "selfish" because i want marijuana to be legal for ALL, thats the opposite of selfishness, you may want to buy a dictionary
your the one who, in an attempt to make everyone else do the same thing you did, want to keep the consumption of weed illegal for the majority
because you feel the need to be in the special minority
sorry, but in no way can i be called "selfish" because i want marijuana to be legal for ALL, thats the opposite of selfishness, you may want to buy a dictionary
Professor Puff.n.Tuff
Active Member
Three people discussing a topic is hardly blown up in my face. I know I am not on the same page as most with not ready for it yet, thats part of the reason why I started this. I want to know why people are pushing so hard to legalize. I am sorry it is a week and a half of your salary, that is not my problem either. Grow some dank and sell it, then you can get a couple scripts.
I am curious to know why you have not answered any of my questions though???
I am curious to know why you have not answered any of my questions though???
Professor Puff.n.Tuff
Active Member
I dont care who has a card I know people that dont smoke that have cards. To say I want to keep it illegal for most is silly.
Answer my questions...
Answer my questions...
Keenly2
Active Member
you have not given me any questions to answer, your telling me im being selfish with my own money because i dont believe in PAYING for legality
your advocating me breaking the law in order to... not break the law?
your posts dont make any sense, they contradict one another
im not going to sell my weed, that defeats the entire purpose of me growing it, because like i said before, i want to grow my OWN weed
your never going to change my opinion on a bill that makes it legal for me to grow my own weed, especially when nothing is brought to the table as far as a counter argument goes other than "dont be cheap and spend 200 bucks like i did"
your advocating me breaking the law in order to... not break the law?
your posts dont make any sense, they contradict one another
im not going to sell my weed, that defeats the entire purpose of me growing it, because like i said before, i want to grow my OWN weed
your never going to change my opinion on a bill that makes it legal for me to grow my own weed, especially when nothing is brought to the table as far as a counter argument goes other than "dont be cheap and spend 200 bucks like i did"
Professor Puff.n.Tuff
Active Member
If you feel that way you have obviously not been paying attention or understanding my posts then. Its not about your limited funds or my limited funds. I would try and tell you but I am afraid you will not understand or read thoroughly again.
If you are really interested in answering my questions you can look for them on page two. I would like to hear what you have to say about them. Sorry you didnt see them the first time around. You should read the entire posts.
If you are really interested in answering my questions you can look for them on page two. I would like to hear what you have to say about them. Sorry you didnt see them the first time around. You should read the entire posts.
Professor Puff.n.Tuff
Active Member
6 votes so far, including one from myself.
4 NOW
1 Later, my vote
1 Never
4 NOW
1 Later, my vote
1 Never
Sustainable420
Active Member
People who are legitamately worried about actual patients should wholly support the law, making weed way more affordable and acessable. It would have some good regulation behind it for safety (mold, anyone?), unlike now. It would incorporate a whole new demographic of customers, ones who don't want to worry about abiding by strict regulations or punishment. Recreational users won't have to abuse a system for something it wasn't intended for. Maintaining the status quo will only keep commerical grow houses running and the owners of the dispenceries. Micro grows will continue to flourish, and probably even grow for personal use. Not to mention all the revenue that this state could really use. Besides, California will set a trend just like how medical use did. Think legal on a federal level!
I love the thought of smoking my own personal grow with friends while not having to be paranoid about getting a felony. Support!
I love the thought of smoking my own personal grow with friends while not having to be paranoid about getting a felony. Support!
CrackerJax
New Member
The poll is way too general. Legal how? There are many ways for weed to be legal. If you are talking nationally, any state prop's are probably not going to be the way it ends up.
There is more than enough support for the new law, in California, to pass come November. However, Just like Prop 215, it will be only half a victory without Feds agreeing to abide by it or decriminalizing it. So much progress is been made towards legalizing, we must use caution to avoid be pushed backwards. Should everyone have the freedom to grow cannabis... HELL YES! but not at the cost of losing what we have already gained.
Sustainable420
Active Member
With the legacy of the medical pot in CA, IF it were to get pushed back it wouldn't be drastic. Feds will maintain the same current system of if you grow and possess for personal medicine *cough* recreation *cough*, they'll look the other way. Simple as that. Any busts will have to break BOTH federal and state for them to give a shit. It will basically take it out of the dark, making the system more legitimate.
Sustainable420
Active Member
I think it was like a grow space of 25 sq. ft. and possession of an ounce with no worries. Don't quote me though. It'll also make it so that each county can decide on what will fly. Much like Texas' wet or dry county policy on alcohol.
CrackerJax
New Member
Okay.... but the OP never says what state he is talking about....and then gives the impression that it could be a national issue.
IF, and I say IF, weed goes national.... you can FORGET any of the current props as templates. They will not be the way weed is legalized nationally.
IF, and I say IF, weed goes national.... you can FORGET any of the current props as templates. They will not be the way weed is legalized nationally.
Professor Puff.n.Tuff
Active Member
I dont think it will make it more affordable. Why would the state take over the market and lower the price, they wont, no reason too, that cuts into there revenue. Yes there would be more people smoking which I TRULY do think will lead to a more positive attitude overall in society. I would love to see everyone relaxed tokin it up, we are not ready though.
This is the CA patients forum....
I think Novembers ballot is scary considering I dont think many people think about the possible consequences of making it legal.
You second point in this post is my whole argument. I feel as though we are putting the cart before the horse. Just like I tried to explain on my first page with the analogy of the dog and hamster. I dont know what is going to happen and what the consequences will be but I know that the state did a terrible job at making sure prop 215 went smoothly. It was a huge step that I am great full for but, it only confirms my belief that we have not established enough guidelines, rules, and regulations to keep everyone satisfied with complete legalization.
If it is LEGAL, why do we have a limit put in place. I can have as many 24 packs of coors. I can have a case of cartons of cigs. They are going to tax the hell out of MJ (NOT bringing the prices down), generate more revenue from arrests from those who have too much, just to let you smoke it on the street. Not worth it...
How should it be legal.
What should we ask the govern/state for?
Is it acceptable to place a limit on crop size, and actual quantities of the product?
Why is this acceptable????
CrackerJax
New Member
Oh my bad... didn't see the Cali header. Not my business...I will bow out.
Professor Puff.n.Tuff
Active Member
Not a problem.
I just did that yesterday. Someone asking for general help and advice. I asked what kind of set up - hydro or dirt - the thread was posted under the "outdoor" forum. I felt like a dummy.
I just did that yesterday. Someone asking for general help and advice. I asked what kind of set up - hydro or dirt - the thread was posted under the "outdoor" forum. I felt like a dummy.
