Twistedfunk
Active Member
Let me rephrase since you seem hell-bent on attacking me and everything I say using an author as your ammunition. I simply was trying to remind the OP of the correct way to determine if a hypothesis is true or not. This is something most american children are taught all throughout our mandatory school years. Much like how we learned the basics of the language we are speaking now and the math we use every day. Why is any of that null and void to you because I do not wish to conduct the experiment myself? I know and have stated what has gotten me the best results and neither of them was soil. So due to that, i have no intention to properly conduct the OP's experiment. I pointed out how HE could do it properly and acquire evidence based on fact instead of a tainted experiment in which the conclusions are still hypothesis. The quote I used was an example to show the mindset that is at the heart of said "experiment".
If you would like to focus on a dead author and teach me more of his many philosophies please feel free to start a new thread in the toke n talk section and ill see you there.
Go on, keep attacking me. The scientific process does not require your belief in it to provide evidence and attempts to discredit the messenger in no way discredits the message.
If you would like to focus on a dead author and teach me more of his many philosophies please feel free to start a new thread in the toke n talk section and ill see you there.
Go on, keep attacking me. The scientific process does not require your belief in it to provide evidence and attempts to discredit the messenger in no way discredits the message.