GreenThumb2k10
Active Member
looking good mate, how far are they gone??
1st from Seed Grow (Cowboy Style)
- Thread starter Don Gin and Ton
- Start date
looking good mate, how far are they gone??
Don Gin and Ton
Well-Known Member
cheers man! Owing to not having my calendar from me old phone i have no idea but their due about the 1st week of november so somewhere about 4.5 weeks, thats actually one of the lower yeilding lookinf pheno's
Don Gin and Ton
Well-Known Member
hahahah no i left my phone charger in a hotel, anyway as if i label dates n names on em lmao
Don Gin and Ton
Well-Known Member
lol if they come a knockin im bang to rights lad. i colour coded the pots 
DST
Well-Known Member
Thanks for the link, Mr West re the guardian article.
What pisses me off was that 20plus years ago I had to stand in front of a judge and be told that my punishment would be my criminal record. I am educated to a level where I have letters after my name for ffs, yet I wouldn't even be able to get a job in a dole office, bank, or any other government job because of my record....so does that mean I can claim compensation when it's decriminalised for fuking my life chances up? haha.
What pisses me off was that 20plus years ago I had to stand in front of a judge and be told that my punishment would be my criminal record. I am educated to a level where I have letters after my name for ffs, yet I wouldn't even be able to get a job in a dole office, bank, or any other government job because of my record....so does that mean I can claim compensation when it's decriminalised for fuking my life chances up? haha.
Don Gin and Ton
Well-Known Member
hahahah id like to see what they said if you wrote that letter to em!? get your pen out to that divvy cameron D!!!
tip top toker
Well-Known Member
For things like this, it seems like government protocol is silence. I write letters and letters to various politicians, police forces, councils, news sites, rarely will i ever hear something back. I think that might be part of their issue with bending and decriminalising, the sheer amount of folk who would goto court for compensation, having their criminal record wiped etc, they'd probably lose a HELL of a lot of money. Although they'd probably just pass some law saying fuck you 
I also like how the article mentions pretty uch nowt but young kids and not wanting to give them a criminal record, well at the end of the day that must aply to everyone else it's discrimination plain and simple and human rights groups would flatten the government. I'm curious as to what happens to a freeman if the cops chop all his plants due to not knowing who he/she was, and then taking them to court stating it's street value was £50,000, that freeman would by law need compensation of £50,000 regardless if it was personal use and just a pound of bud etc. I've noticed that estimates on value seem to be getting a lot more realistic these days.
I also like how the article mentions pretty uch nowt but young kids and not wanting to give them a criminal record, well at the end of the day that must aply to everyone else it's discrimination plain and simple and human rights groups would flatten the government. I'm curious as to what happens to a freeman if the cops chop all his plants due to not knowing who he/she was, and then taking them to court stating it's street value was £50,000, that freeman would by law need compensation of £50,000 regardless if it was personal use and just a pound of bud etc. I've noticed that estimates on value seem to be getting a lot more realistic these days.
Don Gin and Ton
Well-Known Member
i was under the impression that all complaint letters etc had to be dealt with and logged by oifficail orifices!?!?
tip top toker
Well-Known Member
Apparently not. So far as i am aware, unless the complaint is served, such as signed mail, or personal transfer of the complaint, then they are not bound by owt, they can just deny. On the whole if they keep quiet it's cus you're on to sommehting. A very small and silly example is the concil recently went around putting up fliers stating that double parking was now illegal in our streets, and that XYZ constituted double parking (parking more tha 50cm from the curb was cou/nted as double parking and that you would be fined or car removed). So i sent a letter asking for clarification on the actual parking rules, with regard to how smart cars can part perpendicular to the curb and not recieve tickets, no reply, a month later and it seems the whole neighbourhood has worked htis out, half the streets just bay park and stick out the same if not momre than double parking. not one ticket for anyone yet.
With regard to the govt/councils requirement to reply, even then i am a little vague. this freeman shit i've been reading up on, the reason it is all so vague, is that even after having served your notice, legally, they will not reply, they will not even reply to your follwoing notice of non-response, which if not-replied to, means that they have agreeed to your first notice, but they don't reply, no reply of 100% positive confirmation, leaves people still guessing, hope they wrote their notice correctly etc, thye are very sneaky. If it puts them in a comproising situation, where they know you will win if they reply legally and non-fraudulantly, then they simply wont, pinky and his 3 ounces of medical annabis are pretty firm evidence of this. He cold not even find a security guard at the airport to talk to about his bag of cannabis, presumedly they had all been ordered to staya well clear, if they spoke to him, they'd have to clairfy legally just what the law was, in this case it certainly looks like he was right, and as such, the govt knew that if they did meet him at the airport, they would by law have to nod thier heads and tell him he's correect, to which pinky wouldh have cideo recorded this to which all hell would hae broken lose in the UK.
Lokk at me ranting away, my bad.
With regard to the govt/councils requirement to reply, even then i am a little vague. this freeman shit i've been reading up on, the reason it is all so vague, is that even after having served your notice, legally, they will not reply, they will not even reply to your follwoing notice of non-response, which if not-replied to, means that they have agreeed to your first notice, but they don't reply, no reply of 100% positive confirmation, leaves people still guessing, hope they wrote their notice correctly etc, thye are very sneaky. If it puts them in a comproising situation, where they know you will win if they reply legally and non-fraudulantly, then they simply wont, pinky and his 3 ounces of medical annabis are pretty firm evidence of this. He cold not even find a security guard at the airport to talk to about his bag of cannabis, presumedly they had all been ordered to staya well clear, if they spoke to him, they'd have to clairfy legally just what the law was, in this case it certainly looks like he was right, and as such, the govt knew that if they did meet him at the airport, they would by law have to nod thier heads and tell him he's correect, to which pinky wouldh have cideo recorded this to which all hell would hae broken lose in the UK.
Lokk at me ranting away, my bad.
DST
Well-Known Member
Yer fekking right I am guessing....not a clue! lmao.
tip top toker
Well-Known Member
Exactly what they have strived to achieve. Why else would they remove the institution from the curriculum, they odn't want people knowing about it, i mean hell, until 2 onths ago i didn't even know that we had a UK Constitution, like the Americans have and use to do as they need to do. I need to give that a good going over. Now they're looking at banning smoking at home and in cars, it wont be long till people turn around a simply say bugger off, there is already debate and such over whether the community should have the legal right to turn around and say F you to health and safety rules and measures if they deem them pointless regardless of council demands of them being implemented etc
DST
Well-Known Member
I would definitely change that one moment when we knocked on that dealers door...i was 17 years old ffs, the Drug Squad guys had guns, I had to strip me naked, I have not shat myself much in life, but by god was i pooping it then. Apart from that, definitiely not Hemlock!!! you learn by your mistakes.
Don Gin and Ton
Well-Known Member
who's pinky?Apparently not. So far as i am aware, unless the complaint is served, such as signed mail, or personal transfer of the complaint, then they are not bound by owt, they can just deny. On the whole if they keep quiet it's cus you're on to sommehting. A very small and silly example is the concil recently went around putting up fliers stating that double parking was now illegal in our streets, and that XYZ constituted double parking (parking more tha 50cm from the curb was cou/nted as double parking and that you would be fined or car removed). So i sent a letter asking for clarification on the actual parking rules, with regard to how smart cars can part perpendicular to the curb and not recieve tickets, no reply, a month later and it seems the whole neighbourhood has worked htis out, half the streets just bay park and stick out the same if not momre than double parking. not one ticket for anyone yet.
With regard to the govt/councils requirement to reply, even then i am a little vague. this freeman shit i've been reading up on, the reason it is all so vague, is that even after having served your notice, legally, they will not reply, they will not even reply to your follwoing notice of non-response, which if not-replied to, means that they have agreeed to your first notice, but they don't reply, no reply of 100% positive confirmation, leaves people still guessing, hope they wrote their notice correctly etc, thye are very sneaky. If it puts them in a comproising situation, where they know you will win if they reply legally and non-fraudulantly, then they simply wont, pinky and his 3 ounces of medical annabis are pretty firm evidence of this. He cold not even find a security guard at the airport to talk to about his bag of cannabis, presumedly they had all been ordered to staya well clear, if they spoke to him, they'd have to clairfy legally just what the law was, in this case it certainly looks like he was right, and as such, the govt knew that if they did meet him at the airport, they would by law have to nod thier heads and tell him he's correect, to which pinky wouldh have cideo recorded this to which all hell would hae broken lose in the UK.
Lokk at me ranting away, my bad.
me too man my brain feels like someone left a hot karl in it today.
apart form a hangover im fine fella ! its subsiding just :/
true that lad mistakes make you. wish i hadnt made so many tho haha
blue skies but cloudy in my mind lol i just want a nap. no sympathy all self inflicted.
commencing manning the f@ck up
Don Gin and Ton
Well-Known Member
dude if only. i could murder a butty, whilst mumbling my way round morrisons whispering braaaaaaaaaiins i picked up a pot noodle ffsaww bless ya don mate do u me to make u a cup of tea and a bacon sarnie? You sit there wile the kettle boils and ill make u a spliff>>>>>>>>>>