michaeljdumpout
Well-Known Member
I think u all deserve it for those good answers
Finally someone I can relate to. When I have kids, they won't be getting any vaccinations. AT ALL. They'll be home-schooled also.agreed..if it's a planned pregnancy, i would be even mroe health-conscious than i already am..for atleast a few good weeks/months. it takes two to make a baby. i want as little toxins, chemicals, foreign substances, mind-altering substances as possible...that includes all vaccinations
I was one of the lucky few to escape the public school system with my sanity and an ability to critically think. I lay a lot of thanks on my mother who is a critical thinker. Public education in this country is a fucking joke. It's more like an assembly line than a place of learning.Finally someone I can relate to. When I have kids, they won't be getting any vaccinations. AT ALL. They'll be home-schooled also.
Don't need the public-fool system to turn my kids into non-critically thinking, placid zombies.
Sorry that was off subject. Carry on, don't even reply.
WOW SPEECHLESS...... but never the less I would just do whats rightif you are interested in real science instead of stoned uneducated conjecture, check out the discussion from a university study done in jamaica. there is a link to the full study at the bottom.
Although no positive or negative neurobehavioral effects of prenatal exposure were found at 3 days of life using the Brazelton examination, there were significant differences between the exposed and nonexposed neonates at the end of the first month. Comparing the two groups, the neonates of mothers who used marijuana showed better physiological stability at 1 month and required less examiner facilitation to reach an organized state and become available for social stimulation. The results of the comparison of neonates of the heavy-marijuana-using mothers and those of the nonusing mothers were even more striking. The heavily exposed neonates were more socially responsive and were more autonomically stable at 30 days than their matched counterparts. The quality of their alertness was higher; their motor and autonomic systems were more robust; they were less irritable; they were less likely to demonstrate any imbalance of tone; they needed less examiner facilitation to become organized; they had better self-regulation; and were judged to be more rewarding for caregivers than the neonates of nonusing mothers at 1 month of age.
http://www.druglibrary.org/Schaffer/hemp/medical/can-babies.htm
Your kids are going to be anti social... that's not very healthy. I would rather my kid be a zombie then an anti social serial killer living with 2 cats. AM JOKING lol do what you want with your kidsFinally someone I can relate to. When I have kids, they won't be getting any vaccinations. AT ALL. They'll be home-schooled also.
Don't need the public-fool system to turn my kids into non-critically thinking, placid zombies.
Sorry that was off subject. Carry on, don't even reply.
well i'm replying!!! lol, i posted a vaccinations thread in the politics forum before but it wasn't too popular..at least not as much as the new world order thread or global warming thread:Finally someone I can relate to. When I have kids, they won't be getting any vaccinations. AT ALL. They'll be home-schooled also.
Don't need the public-fool system to turn my kids into non-critically thinking, placid zombies.
Sorry that was off subject. Carry on, don't even reply.
EXACTLY just because someone tell your ass to jump off a 1000 foot bridge and tell u its safe dont mean you going to do itwell i'm replying!!! lol, i posted a vaccinations thread in the politics forum before but it wasn't too popular..at least not as much as the new world order thread or global warming thread:
https://www.rollitup.org/politics/377099-vaccinations-swine-flu.html
agreed...the public school system in the US is horrible..but so is the "higher learning"..american colleges and universities are horrible.
anyway back on topic...even if some research studies proved that marijuana was not harmful or even good for a baby in womb..i still wouldn't want my woman to smoke.
nice, nothing like willful ignorance . i am just waiting for the religion argument to be used for this.anyway back on topic...even if some research studies proved that marijuana was not harmful or even good for a baby in womb..i still wouldn't want my woman to smoke.
it's not willful ignorance. i think a lot of other members will tell you that i thoroughly research the things i say (in the politics forum, not here).nice, nothing like willful ignorance . i am just waiting for the religion argument to be used for this.
read my post.thats what i was citingtheres actually a study done in jamaca , couldnt find the article sorry
Its cool im givimg you REP anyway for making some strong pointsalso anecdotally, i know a number of women that smoked during their first trimester in order to be able to function through bad morning sickness. pot was the only thing that got rid of the nausea. also i have heard of women smoking pot during the birth instead of having an epidural.