Do We Dare Discuss 911 With Poll
- Thread starter canuckgrow
- Start date
Balzac89
Undercover Mod
The fire burned at an average temperature of 800F and the fire lasted for about 1 and a half ours. After 30 minutes at 800 degrees the structural strength of steel is less than 90 percent of its original strength.
its all there while the fires weren't hot enough to actually melt steel it can significantly weaken it the the point where it can no longer bare weight.
its all there while the fires weren't hot enough to actually melt steel it can significantly weaken it the the point where it can no longer bare weight.
Balzac89
Undercover Mod
And the fact that a plane hit it?Heated by fires until failure? Like the fires from this building?
So if that were true, then this building which burned for far far longer and burned 100% of the building did not weaken and fall. Please explain how physics and science work in China, but on 9/11 in the USA they ceased to exist?
Here is that same building after burning for FIVE TIMES AS LONG as the twin towers did.
Here is what it looked like before.....
medicineman
New Member
Actually, Just like all the revisionist JFK bullshit trying to prove the magic bullet theory while the back of his head flew the fuck off, we'll never know. The revisionists, (people in power) will always deny any inside involvement, Just as they deny the presence of UFOs. I guess I'm a "conspiracy theorists", even though I don't believe they are false.
Like I said, a plane hitting a building is akin to a corvette hitting a locomotive. No real structural damage would be done by an aluminum plane vs 4 foot thick steel box girders. The fuel was 99% taken out of the equation by the big explosion after the impact, thats your jet fuel being all burned up, jet fuel would have no bearing on the subject as it was all burned up minutes after impact. Shit don't last forever.
rollajoint
Well-Known Member
I dont know about thiss its something soo disastress i really dont think that bush or his party could hide this for as long as the planning would of taken to pull of such a stunt. People will say well they have kept bigger secrets and i agree with you . Ive seen some of the conspiracy videos and i must say they doo make you think . But if they did do it bush would of had to contacted a lot of people to pull it off and it would of only took one of his counterparts to spill the beans . I really dont know .The more i think writing this it does actually make me think that it was an inside job of some sort .
According to Bush, he saw the whole thing transpire on TV. But if that were true, then either he had someone giving him a live feed and therfore knew it was coming, or he totally lied about it. NO ONE saw the video of the first plane hitting the building until the next day.
Is this a lie? Or the truth?
[video=youtube;Sm73wOuPL60]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sm73wOuPL60[/video]
Is this a lie? Or the truth?
[video=youtube;Sm73wOuPL60]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sm73wOuPL60[/video]
incognegro999
Well-Known Member
I cant say one way or another this is what happened, However for three buildings to drop perfectly onto each other like that is just crazy. demo companies spend months setting up to get them to drop perfect so the fact the fire/structural failure/ alignment of the stars causes it to happen is kinda far fetched to me
Balzac89
Undercover Mod
or maybe he miss spoke? it happens you know. I'm sure he did hear about the first plane hitting then the second while he was in the class room.
Balzac89
Undercover Mod
Those buildings are designed to collapse on themselves its a city guy.
Ok so explain how the other 99% of the building became so damaged that they instantaneously all failed at the exact same moment? You don't see anything crashing into the good floors and being held up or altering trajectory do you? Hell no, it all just fails so perfectly. those floors are each built to support TEN TIMES the weight they actually do support. Explain how all the floors below and above the crash point all fail at the exact same time? Magic?
incognegro999
Well-Known Member
they design building's to collapse on themselves? I thought they designed them to stay up lol
incognegro999
Well-Known Member
haha yah saw that, awesome
No they aren't! Thats a completely ignorant statement, where is your proof/evidence that they build skyscrapers to fall in on themselves? They have demolition companies place strategic explosive charges in just the right place to make them come down on themselves.