canuckgrow
Well-Known Member
Fuck me running this is overload for me right now guys.....Some real good posts on both sides and it has been umm fairly civil..........good stuff
Do We Dare Discuss 911 With Poll
- Thread starter canuckgrow
- Start date
all i have asked is 1 question and you can't seem to get a grasp on it. 1 question asked repeatedly now and you got nothing.
all you seem to know how to do is argue. open your mind and try to THINK for a minute.
"what really happened?"
have you figured out the question yet, i'm still waiting for your answer .........
i don't hear anything either, i see something exploding.
0:06. you can see a window being blown out with explosive force.
nobody can claim otherwise.
I thought I was clear on this. I DON"T KNOW WHAT REALLY HAPPENED? DO YOU?
yet you know exactly what DIDN'T happen?
with all the evidence given you can't come up with some "theory"? nothing at all? not even a "possibility? did you really suggest a death ray?
i am asking for something to believe in other then the official story. can ANYONE help me?
Death ray? They had a prototype by 1993. neutral particle beam weapon. Part of the US Strategic Defense Initiative ( Star Wars program )
http://physicsworldarchive.iop.org/index.cfm?action=summary&doc=2/1/phwv2i1a6@pwa-xml&qt=
Don't say it isn't possible.
The reason you want answers FDD is becasue you know that the story being presented as the truth is a bunch of BS, you feel it don't you?
http://physicsworldarchive.iop.org/index.cfm?action=summary&doc=2/1/phwv2i1a6@pwa-xml&qt=
Don't say it isn't possible.
The reason you want answers FDD is becasue you know that the story being presented as the truth is a bunch of BS, you feel it don't you?
does the reason even matter? let's just start with something i can hold onto. "inside job" doesn't really give me much. i need some "substance".
so ... "what happened"? the proof is in the evidence.
Balzac89
Undercover Mod
lol fdd ur crazy
incognegro999
Well-Known Member
If I thought you were actually asking for help and not being glib I might think about it. Lets change the subject. Nuclear explosions. For example if a nuclear bomb was to detonate there is a way to tell exactly when and where that nuclear material came from. by studying the radiation levels etc etc they could look in a book and say ok this came from this plant at this time.
incognegro999
Well-Known Member
Would you believe that the U.S government has nuclear weapons in its inventory that are designed to exactly replicate other super powers atomic weapons? so for instance we have a way to detonate a bomb in saudi arabia that to the experts would look exactly like an Isreali Jericho missile
incognegro999
Well-Known Member
I love a good conspiracy theory haha
I don't have any evidence, I only have other sources evidence. Pictures can only do so much, youtubes can only do so much. What if the explosives theory was just a theory that was used as a coverup of the real cause? What if it was an energy beam? a "Death Ray" as you put it? "The Art of Projecting Concentrated Non-dispersive Energy through the Natural Media". may have answers. Nikola Tesla said he could create a weapon of such formidable power even back in 1930. The press dubbed it a "Peace Ray". What if?
Balzac89
Undercover Mod
What if you just woke up one day and for once saw the world for what it is.
my bad then.
i just figured with all the evidence to claim "it's an inside job", there would be enough to lead to some type of scenario.
guess i'll just go with "death ray".
Aren't you the guy that said Architects design buildings to collapse?
doc111
Well-Known Member
lol!!!!!!!!!! I didn't explain shit! We are trained to handle collapses in a variety of structures and a variety of construction types, up to and including steel frame skyscrapers. Skyscrapers present unique challenges that are not present in normal highrises or single story structures. Go on and admit it! You didn't read the whole article did you?
I posted the first link to give you an IDEA of the types of building collapses and how they are viewed from the fire service perspective, which is the only one that matters since we are the only ones extensively trained to deal with the aftermath of a building collapse. And let me just say that was an incredibly BRIEF synopsis of the ONE class I took. Building collapse technician class is NO JOKE my friend! But I digress. Skycrapers don't fall under NORMAL fire conditions. This was NOT NORMAL fire conditions. The forces, although brief, which the buildings were exposed to were massive! 767 is a very large plane, I don't have to explain this to you. Skyscrapers are very tough, and they have throughout their brief history withstood all kinds of insults. They are not indestructable and these buildings actually withstood the initial impacts remarkably well. We will obviously never really know what happened, and as long as people are crying for a new investigation, which is completely impossible, these "theories" will go unproven. The progressive pancake collapse theory is a plausible one. More plausible, IMO, than any of the controlled demo, false flag, nano-thermite, remote control planes, "theories". Where are the hordes of building engineers and demolition technicians and engineers and pissed off firemen screaming for blood? Sure, there are a few of the previously mentioned who have offered their professional opinion that supports the truthers, but by and large, most of the experts who have examined this tragedy agree that it is what it appears to be; a terrorist attack.