PeachOibleBoiblePeach#1
Well-Known Member
They have been for hours.
So what do you guys think about Japans recent tsunami and there nuclear plants
- Thread starter WvMade
- Start date
ndzbnln
Active Member
this whole weather thing looks like a population control conspiracy theory to me,reasons being is channled from the weather H.A.R.R.P.I mean haiti,japan,near mexico.I might smoke entirely way to much weed and might be slightly paranoid.but i feel like if anyone had to power to do whatever they want like america why wouldnt you take advantage of that power.useing weather as a weapon would be godlike.plus i dont see why america would want to make somthing to control the weather and not use it.i know this is off topic,but 9-11 and bp.just seems like a cover up to stick their nose in places where it doesnt belong.fuck u.s.a i say let us all fight it outlikecavemen.or its really near the end,and 2012 is getting closer by the minute
StonedPony
Well-Known Member
Actually the coverment used weather control in Viet Nam..........seeding skies to make it rain to fuck up the HO Chin mien trail to stop North Nam from useing it as thier main supply line...............it had moderate success............look it up......im sure its on the web somewhere.
Kodank Moment
Well-Known Member
Their a big country. Plus they are super smart. They'll live. It's Japans problem.
Serapis
Well-Known Member
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/03/11/japan.nuclear/index.html?hpt=T1
They are not going to intentionally release radiation.... One of the plants has a leak and the control room has radiation levels at 1000 times normal. People have been evacuated for 2-3 kilometers from the plant with the leak.
They are not going to intentionally release radiation.... One of the plants has a leak and the control room has radiation levels at 1000 times normal. People have been evacuated for 2-3 kilometers from the plant with the leak.
DelSlow
Well-Known Member
All that happened was a huge earthquake...followed by a large tsunami...pretty straight forward, don't ya think?
An angry god? So I guess god always sides with america, huh?
the media is really downplaying how nuclear reactors are melting down...
they keep referring to how they automatically shut off... problem is that once the nuclear reaction starts, you have to actively stop it. with the reactor shutting down it's a little harder to do that....see the purpose is that conditions won't be made more optimal for a meltdown... but that takes away a lot of their ability to control the reaction within the core.... all they can hope for is to douse it with 'coolant' and hope the temperature drops enough that physics stops the reaction. they make it sound like everything's alright... when that happens, usually it's worse than what you may imagine...... there's a 'let's hope nothing goes wrong' aura about the whole deal, and nuclear power is just too dangerous for that.....
i'm sure the money is keeping the media hush hush, but i'm expecting some revolutionary changes coming in international nuclear policy, in terms of contigiency planning requirements for new nuclear powerplants......
they keep referring to how they automatically shut off... problem is that once the nuclear reaction starts, you have to actively stop it. with the reactor shutting down it's a little harder to do that....see the purpose is that conditions won't be made more optimal for a meltdown... but that takes away a lot of their ability to control the reaction within the core.... all they can hope for is to douse it with 'coolant' and hope the temperature drops enough that physics stops the reaction. they make it sound like everything's alright... when that happens, usually it's worse than what you may imagine...... there's a 'let's hope nothing goes wrong' aura about the whole deal, and nuclear power is just too dangerous for that.....
i'm sure the money is keeping the media hush hush, but i'm expecting some revolutionary changes coming in international nuclear policy, in terms of contigiency planning requirements for new nuclear powerplants......
ndzbnln
Active Member
yup im in the right thread.thats my opinion on the tsunami.
OregonMeds
Well-Known Member
The person who said HAARP should get a cookie... Spot on.
This is where you folks that don't know about HAARP can take the red pill, or the blue pill.
Read and watch videos with an open mind or walk away, up to you.
Why would they do that?
Wouldn't the smartest thing to do when faced with looking bad if you don't save people in libya, especially when you don't want to save them, when it would be a threat to your state of Israel partner in crime to have free arab states all around them be to distract the world, and let those kids just looking for freedom and a better life all get killed off? Yep... It would be perfect if there was something bigger to distract our one track minds, and what better way to spur economic growth?
But everyone will think that's crazy, we wouldn't do that... We wouldn't kill as a distraction or just to make money. Have, proof is out there. It's almost impossible to imagine our goverment is doing these things but they are. But Japan isn't an enemy? So what, they have lots of money don't they? And they're best prepared anyway, no big deal... (Is what they're thinking.)
"Absolute power corrupts absolutely."
Start here:
[youtube]1TupOTt5mbY[/youtube]
Plenty more evidence where that came from on youtube, you just have to look.
But you might miss this subtle evidence. I'm pretty sure this is the aurora borealis like visual signature of harp explained in the vids: (Which is why we hid the source in Alaska don't you know, and then got a strange face in the presidential race who has no business there.)
[youtube]KKMTSDzU1Z4[/youtube]
Once you start looking into things further, it gets even scarier.
This is where you folks that don't know about HAARP can take the red pill, or the blue pill.
Read and watch videos with an open mind or walk away, up to you.
Why would they do that?
Wouldn't the smartest thing to do when faced with looking bad if you don't save people in libya, especially when you don't want to save them, when it would be a threat to your state of Israel partner in crime to have free arab states all around them be to distract the world, and let those kids just looking for freedom and a better life all get killed off? Yep... It would be perfect if there was something bigger to distract our one track minds, and what better way to spur economic growth?
But everyone will think that's crazy, we wouldn't do that... We wouldn't kill as a distraction or just to make money. Have, proof is out there. It's almost impossible to imagine our goverment is doing these things but they are. But Japan isn't an enemy? So what, they have lots of money don't they? And they're best prepared anyway, no big deal... (Is what they're thinking.)
"Absolute power corrupts absolutely."
Start here:
[youtube]1TupOTt5mbY[/youtube]
Plenty more evidence where that came from on youtube, you just have to look.
But you might miss this subtle evidence. I'm pretty sure this is the aurora borealis like visual signature of harp explained in the vids: (Which is why we hid the source in Alaska don't you know, and then got a strange face in the presidential race who has no business there.)
[youtube]KKMTSDzU1Z4[/youtube]
Once you start looking into things further, it gets even scarier.
newatit2010
Well-Known Member
God willing and the creek don't rise, maybe it is the start of 2012.
OregonMeds
Well-Known Member
They want you to think that and global warming... They want your carbon credits money and to lower the world population to push off peak oil, that's the only way to keep the ball rolling or we hit a brick wall soon if the whole world were free and gobbled up the oil fast.
Just greed, power, and money...
You thought you were free? You've never been free. Watch Zeitgeist.
[youtube]4Z9WVZddH9w[/youtube]
Pass the word...
Just greed, power, and money...
You thought you were free? You've never been free. Watch Zeitgeist.
[youtube]4Z9WVZddH9w[/youtube]
Pass the word...
OregonMeds
Well-Known Member
I already said that, but I guess you missed it so I'll give you credit for guessing correctly.
Serapis
Well-Known Member
While I definitely respect your point of view, I have to disagree with it sharply. You insinuate that the people on the streets of Libya are fighting for freedom and democracy. The same conclusion was hastily drawn up during the uprisings in Egypt, and now the military runs the country and has suspended the constitution. They have promised elections in the future, but we have heard that before with Saddam, Qhadaffi, Castro, and anyone else that has led a coupd'etat. The people on the streets of Libya have taken up arms. Getting involved now would be interfering with another country's politics. Obama is right to be leary of this one, he has Republicans that portray him as a big government spender and we have no assets or interests to protect in Libya. President Obama is waiting for allies or the UN to act first. He has already ordered the Kersage, and a carrier group into the Mediterranean Sea and they are there to act if ordered to. I don't see us getting involved in Libya, as it has turned into a civil war. Both sides are armed, and there is no guarantee the winning side even wants Democracy; they are just fed up with Authoritarian rule.
chillwills
Well-Known Member
And when the jet stream carries the nuclear fallout radiation to North America, Then What?
Serapis
Well-Known Member
