I must be living in a cave because i didnt know KFC was sued for that...and i didnt know they even had burgers.
I guess it could go either way..but i dont think this will be a case that will come up.
I think its kinda small potatos in the big picture.
As i say, i'm just here playing devils advocate. But yes, KFC were sued (mcdonalds might have been as well, can't recall) and kfc do indeed sell burgers, only thing i bother buying from them, the rest is all plain nasty
well ok, the burgers are hardly great either haha, but the sauce can be good, mmm.
With regard to it being a case that comes up, once the rewards for filing the case come up, i' sure it will happen, due to the nature of what it is though i'm sure it would be very hard to convince a court of the justification for your settlement demand etc, people file lawsuits to get a big payoff. Not to mention the guys buying it are stoners, last thing they can be bothered to do is start talking legalesse and getting courst and such involved in their life, let alone what it is relating to
I'm now jsut sat pondering the law on whether it is even possbile to "mislead" someone with the name of a strain. Unless more modern companies have mapped the exact genetics of their strains, then the only method of "proof" as ot whether something was or was not sold as something it wasn't, would be to base it on the opinion of a demographic. If 75% of stoners have plant A and someone buys plant A and it turns out to be plant B, the 75% with a different item would be a good indication, but other than that nothing really. Sorry, getting stoned and just kinda spinning off all over the shop here, ignore me
All i know is that i just have to look at the list of pending patent lawsuits to know that anything is possible haha