The Cryptkeeper
Well-Known Member
Oh the South Park reaction on this is going to be legendary.
Not releasing OSAMA Piks cuz of SENSITIVITY? WTF?
- Thread starter patlpp
- Start date
Osama was not killed in Afganistan. he fled accross the border into pakistan and stayed in a HUGE house.
it's how almost everybody expected a rich arab guy to live. a big house, lots of security, enough medical infrastructure to keep a malnourished arab with kidney failure alive for years....
your distrust in government is ridiculous to the point of lunacy.
it's how almost everybody expected a rich arab guy to live. a big house, lots of security, enough medical infrastructure to keep a malnourished arab with kidney failure alive for years....
your distrust in government is ridiculous to the point of lunacy.
tet1953
Well-Known Member
Actually the customary form appears to be bin Laden. In the Arabic naming system, which can be very complicated with a long string of names, bin (or ibn) means "son of". A daughter would have "bint". So, in this context, referring to Mr. Laden is not that far a stretch, although probably still incorrect.
Other cultures have similar references, such as Russian. The "vich" or "vitch" part means son or daughter of (e.g. Ivanovitch or son of Ivan).
Just stuff I've picked up along the way, I'm no expert.
Other cultures have similar references, such as Russian. The "vich" or "vitch" part means son or daughter of (e.g. Ivanovitch or son of Ivan).
Just stuff I've picked up along the way, I'm no expert.
ziggittyzag420
Active Member
satan in southpark just gotta new arab to spar with LMAOO
LaKapitone
Active Member
Lmao, I apoloigize sir... MR. BIN LADEN.
Maybe now, it's appropriate? Lol. +rep for you see4...5..6.789........10. =)
Wait, so the smartass was actually not to smart? Lol, jk... good catch though by both of you dudes (see4 & tet) I like tet's better, makes me sort of right aha.
In the year 2011, fuck, in the year 2000... it was very much possible. DNA can solve a mystery like that my friend. Just saying.
worm5376
Well-Known Member
Let me rephrase that... They would have to DNA every body that is blown to shits, not only that but they would have to take multiples of (most likely) the same body since it's not as a whole.
They have no clue which arm/leg/head goes where. Kinda difficult. I just don't see them having a shootout, then dna testing all of the deceased.
They have no clue which arm/leg/head goes where. Kinda difficult. I just don't see them having a shootout, then dna testing all of the deceased.
LaKapitone
Active Member
Lol you make it sound so Hollywood "shoot out" "blown to shitts" I love that. Maybe that's because I'm big on movies. Anyway, no... I can see where your coming from. Thank you for rephrasing, I was thinking, "this motherfucker don't know what dna is or what?" Lol. But, idk how the government or people working under the government (directly) handle business. Half the time, I don't know how they solve murders like they do, but they do. They are a lot smarter, detailed, & organized then us. We are use to blood, guts, gore, it's what we see on TV/movies. So, were adapted to think that this thing was a mess, a shoot-out like you described it. Body pieces everywhere! Impossible to piece em together!
But, think about how easy it would be, when you really think (or maybe I'm just high, just smoked a bowl lol) but if they can put together strings of events, leading to a murder or capture, you don't think they can put together body pieces? Especially right infront of em? It wouldn't be so far fetched to say, if they blew away 40 people, an he was one, they could find his body (in full) within a week. DNA. All they have to do is take in EVERY body part they find, which shouldnt be hard, from the last tooth to the last ear on the ground... DNA test them ALL. Then you put it together easy after that... because now you have a leg that has "DNA #4302" for example, then you find the other leg, with the matching #4302 tag... not hard.
Trust me, if they 'believe' they killed Bin Laden, you can guaran-damned-tee they are going to DNA test every last HAIR in that place.
But then again... maybe just to stoned. Lol.
see4
Well-Known Member
Why not? DNA testing is a simple procedure, like organizing chow time. We have the money to do it, why not have a shoot out and test everyone after... that is certainly not out of the realm of possibility.
see4
Well-Known Member
I think you're right. DNA testing for the United States government is small potatoes, we have the resources and manpower to do it. It is totally conceivable to shoot a bunch of fish in a barrel and test them all afterwards.
LaKapitone
Active Member
Lmao, how wrong that sounds... but how right it is.
olylifter420
Well-Known Member
Well, im sorry. I dont bother to keep up with whats going on around the world...
and I thought you said.something about ppl who answer with short answers are not good to learn from, or something similar to that.
Anyways, thanks for the update.
and I thought you said.something about ppl who answer with short answers are not good to learn from, or something similar to that.
Anyways, thanks for the update.
LaKapitone
Active Member
No, actually the original quote was: "EDIT: The way I've always been taught, the more knowledge, the better. People with short answers, usually don't know & usually can't help you learn. =) =)"
-The word 'Usually" before "Don't know" & the word "Usually" before "Can't help you learn" means that there is a margin for short answers holding value as well. But, usually, meaning statistically, they won't be as much of help. But good thing I added in "Usually" huh? Other wise, you may have been on to something there.
Anyways, your welcome for the update dude.
worm5376
Well-Known Member
I was saying to myself " Now this mothf*ker thinks idk what dna testing is 
I smoked a little bit and thought about it, Now everything seems possible.. hahaha!
I guess Under the right circumstances, it is very feasible..Can you imagine the bets that took place on who,where,how he would die? Someone lost money and someone had a steak dinner on that other person.
I smoked a little bit and thought about it, Now everything seems possible.. hahaha!
I guess Under the right circumstances, it is very feasible..Can you imagine the bets that took place on who,where,how he would die? Someone lost money and someone had a steak dinner on that other person.
Chow time can be a pain in the ass BTW.. This is meat.... This ain't meat! Pick your poison..
LaKapitone
Active Member
Yeah I think the toke or two always helps you center on things. That's usually how I complete assignments for most the courses I'm taking. Love weed.
Total Head
Well-Known Member
you try WAAAYYYY too fucking hard. let me go real slow for you and make this as overly wordy as i possibly can so it holds your attention. unlike referring to an ADMITTED terrorist by the title of "mister", "pics or it didn't happen" IS "just an expression". i never said "conspiracy" yet you jumped at the opportunity to respond with a book of a post that i promise 80% of members got bored with 2 lines in. i repeat: if the word of a stranger is good enough for you ater a 10 year manhunt, what have YOU been smoking? i saw dead saddam, dead saddam's family, and numerous other dead pieces of shit (the gov was HAPPY to release it), yet the biggest trophy of all has absolutely zero proof. how hard would it have been to take a video during all this? file footage? really?
LaKapitone
Active Member
True. There are some people out there with a lot of money. So much money, they're bored of buying shiit we can all buy, that they turn to things like Bin Laden's head, or weird shiit like that. That nobody can get, even other rich people. It's cool, I mean - Idk what being bored of money feels like. But damned... I think I'd like to know, lol.
LaKapitone
Active Member
Dude, were sooooooo fucking beyond this. Can you not tell, there's another conversation already going on. You took way to long on the crack-pipe to get back to me. Thanks for playing though. I'm bored of beating this conversation to death.
Edit: Example of how I can beat this convo. to death? Saying that it's okay to call one terrorist a Mr. & not another because one admits it, is again, moronic. So is it okay to let one rapist go but not the other since one admits it? Even though proof shows they both are? Lmao.