Well ya, i said i made a mistake, and trolling was not intended. The problem is he offers no valid argument, just nonsensical trash and then moves on to insults (which i have quotes of from both threads).
Loved the episode, and im getting desperate enough to try to find a cam of that play =D
Correction this is what one must remember:
Most of what you mention took place under the "mosaic law" and have come to pass. Since you're not a bible scholar,you wouldn't know that.
Then how would you explain the Dead Sea Scrolls, reading today as it did 2,000 years ago? This is physical evidence, a reasonable person wouldn't ignore. Some people close their eyes to such prove, or you one? You can't touch that!!
Thus sayeth the kloset man.
Correction this is what one must remember:
Originally Posted by thexception
". . .U want people to bring proof to u, bring proof that they are just stories, bring proof that this outdated information is not as important or doesnt have as much meaning as it did...2,000 years ago. I will give you proof, the mere acceptance by the larger majority around the world on planet earth that do believe in a higher power and in Jesus, & in the bible. The acceptance that has been & will continue to be for another 2,000 years if earth last that long. What more proof do u need?"
And since gays still make your 'skin crawl' merely for being gay, id bet not as much has changed as you think.
Please tell me why they have banned several books out of the DSS then? This has been asked before...
You mean commonly accepted ideas like the earth hanging upon nothing and being round. Job 26:7 and Isaiah 40:22
I don't know what you're referring to.
Yeah, the Dead Sea Scrolls that only got partially used. You know, those "other" books of the Bible? ANYONE can pick through a collection of info and pick out only that which support his ideas.
Yes you do, but, its off topic for this thread. It has been asked a few times here, and even more times in the other thread, but continue your dodging.
I never said they make my skin crawl. However, the homosexual act itself is very "loathsome", but I never met a gay I didn't like-honestly.
This doesn't matter to Klosetman, because he has a different agenda. His goal is "condone" homosexuality, regardless to what others my think. Judging form his post here and in the other threads, he's in denial about his sexuality-still in the Kloset. This is why he can't tolerate comments like the one Slojo made about.
Sir, you're sounding like a fool again.
Sure Bro.
