sen.c
Active Member
Like I said I asserted it, and I stand by it and accept responsibility for all you who it made feel the way you described in your previous post. From an intellectual stand point merit is in the eye of the person reading it. I don't expect you to understand it through your scientific method of thinking, sometimes things just have to be and people have to just accept the fact that there will be things that will never be understood. You know, sometimes I believe that if a person tried hard enough he could actually over analyze something to the point of making it nonexsistent in his own mind.Authoring a post is not the same as taking responsibility for your assertions. My liking or not liking the post is beside the point of it having no intellectual merit.
Call it what you will but my belief makes no scientific claims other than what the scientific community wants to call a scientific claim to support their argument. I happen to believe that God is above science and there are many things in everyday life that leave science without an answer.Ad hominem attack, not surprising. Your belief makes a number of scientific claims. The virgin birth is a claim of biology. Walking on water is a claim of physics. Healing the sick is a claim of physiology. Even prayer suggests a substantial declaration about extra sensory mental communication. Religion makes no attempts to stay outside of science, despite constantly pleading that science leave it outside.
So what is your point, is the mind and heart of mankind not evil? How else do you explain the atrocities capable of coming out of the human thought process? It had to come from somewhere didn't it? Are you saying there is no such thing as evil?So again, spreading with certainty the belief of original sin which entails prejudice, guilt, torture, and employs manipulation does not warrant to you any more justification than some words from an old book which gives no evidence whatsoever of being written by anything other than mortals oblivious to any rational sense of how reality operates. This is your idea of accountability?
Explain to me how reality works, you can't because everyone's reality is different from person to person and that is what makes us unique as individuals. Like I said sometimes you need to just be happy in the fact that you exsist and you will not know some things.
I hold nobody to anything, I can't make you do anything. If someone asks a question I will answer it my way and you answer it your way.What makes you wrong is that you have not given the slightest thought to the validation of your claim, yet hold others to it's standards. Your accusation is inserted into every life by implication, no matter how wholesome and fulfilling that life may be, and creates a dilemma that can only be solved by submitting to one of the most asinine and unsupported ideas in existence.
It would be no more asinine than some of the unsupported ideas you live by and hold as true in science. So again I ask you what makes your truth any better than mine? There are things in mine that can be proven and things that can't and the same is true for your science so what say you. By the way this is not a deflection as you so fondly like to throw out there but a legitimate question.