doc111
Well-Known Member
A lot of people want to lump all business in with the bad ones. It's definitely a good thing to single out the bad guys.I'm referring to Cargill, Monsanto, Dow Chemical, etc. These people view us as sheep for fleecing
A lot of people want to lump all business in with the bad ones. It's definitely a good thing to single out the bad guys.I'm referring to Cargill, Monsanto, Dow Chemical, etc. These people view us as sheep for fleecing
that was awesome, just shows how full of shit most people are.organics taste better??
[video=youtube;8Zqe4ZV9LDs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Zqe4ZV9LDs[/video]
That was fucking hilarious!!!!!organics taste better??
[video=youtube;8Zqe4ZV9LDs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Zqe4ZV9LDs[/video]
I think the power of suggestion is often underestimated when it comes to subjective things such as taste. Unfortunately, most of the studies I found as it relates to health and organic foods seem to suggest that there is no appreciable difference in how healthy organic food is compared to conventionally produced food. I personally believe the power of suggestion is so powerful that if people actually believe they are eating something that is healthier for them, they may actually end up being healthier and living longer. Who knows?SUNDAY, April 10 (HealthDay News) -- An "organic" label on foods is enough to make people believe the food items are healthier and tastier, new research suggests.
The study included 144 volunteers who were asked to compare what they believed were conventionally and organically produced chocolate sandwich cookies, plain yogurt and potato chips. All of the products were actually organic, but they were labeled as either "regular" or "organic."
The participants used a scale of 1 to 9 to rate each of the products on 10 attributes, such as overall taste and perception of fat content. They were also asked to estimate the number of calories in each food item and how much they would be willing to pay for each product.
The investigators found that participants preferred almost all of the taste characteristics of the foods labeled as "organic," even though they were identical to those labeled as "regular."
The food items with "organic" labels were also perceived as being lower in fat, higher in fiber, significantly lower in calories and worth more money, according to study author Jenny Wan-chen Lee, a graduate student in Cornell University's Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management.
In addition, chips and cookies labeled "organic" were judged to be more nutritious than those believed to be non-organic.
Lee conducted the study to test the theory that people are influenced by what is described as "the halo effect," according to background information in a news release from the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. In this case, the researchers set out to see if the "health halo" -- the perception that an item that is labeled "organic" is therefore nutritious -- would lead people to believe that the "organic" foods tasted better.
The study was slated for presentation Sunday at the Experimental Biology annual meeting, in Washington, D.C., of the American Society for Nutrition.
Because this research was presented at a medical meeting, the data and conclusions should be viewed as preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.
More information
The American Academy of Family Physicians offers nutrition advice.
Copyright © 2011 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Tags:organic food, food and drink, psychology, behavior, diet and nutrition
You really don't seem to understand the organic growing style (living organics), and your claim seems dubious. You obviously have this extreme, ill-informed, stereotypical archetype that you hold every organic grower\supporter to (obviously you pay highly into these supposed buzz\bubble-words). Now, if anything, such pervasive over-use of chemical fertilizers and other agro-chemicals is going to lead to a food crisis, as soils become increasing less alive; less fertile and there is less competition from other members of the soil food web against pests. Broad-spectrum pesticides will also kill off the harmless and beneficial species of insects that keep pest insect populations at bay, and they have to be applied continuously.That part there really messes my head up....They use every kind of feces there is, dead animal and plant parts, you know, decaying rotting matter to feed the plants and this is "cleaner" than synthetics made in a laboratory environment? Which are the same "nasty chemicals" that make it possible to produce all the food they eat? Without these "evil synthetics" there WOULD NOT BE ENOUGH FOOD FOR US!! Let us just throw out logic in favor of "it makes me fell good". Ok doc, nice seeing you for sure bro but I am unscribing here as am tired of wasting facts on ...well I will just stop there....Enjoy your little bubble worlds "organnies" before they implode
Namaste
Studies CAN be misleading. It didn't seem like that outlet had an agenda but who knows? I am a firm believer in personal choice. If drinking/eating/smoking/vaping "organic" makes you feel like you are leading a healthier lifestyle then go for it! Like I said, I grow and buy/eat/drink/grow organic when possible. I think both sides need to admit that there is a POSSIBILITY that the health benefit of comsuming "organically" produced goods may be minimal, if a benefit truly exists at all, and that we could be doing irrepairable harm by using chemical ferts and pesticides. We just don't know at this point. Perhaps further studies will give us a better idea if there is any REAL benefit to growing/consuming organic products. In the meantime I will keep on doing the best I can. Organic food is fucking expensive sometimes! lol!My thought is that fertilizers upset the balance in soil. In a bucket in your house, who cares. Outside, fertilizers do a lot of damage.
Maybe the organic growers are all being duped, but I tend to follow the anecdotal evidence of experienced farmers. That study linked was comprised of average consumers and I suspect some company may have simply been trying to make a point.
http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1989564,00.html
I'd like to err on the side of caution and eat /smoke / drink products free of man-made additives.
It's all good. I think it's remained fairly civil TBH. Not sure if you looked at the posts from about a year ago but many have been deleted because it got so out of hand. I wouldn't say "not one opinion was changed". I try to maintain objectivity. I'm neither a hardcore organic lover nor hater. I think both "organic" and "conventional" methods have their place. Perhaps one day we will figure out a way to use more natural means to get the desired results out of mother nature, but generally speaking, "conventional" methods outperform "organic" in yields which is all most people and corporations care about. Some people argue that flavor is affected by different methods but we've seen where taste and smell may be just a bit too subjective and we all know that psychology must play at least a small role (and in some cases a HUGE role). I totally agree with you though........we are all on the same side.As a side note, I respect everyone here and everyone has a right to an opinion. I'm not sure why I wandered to this provocative thread, as I knew full well not one opinion would be changed. And that's cool, since I'm not a paid lobbyist. Cargil and Monsanto have them all! Hahaha. Sorry. I wish compost and earthworms could afford lobbyists.
This thread might be the Chemics vs. the Organics, but let's keep in mind that we are all on the same side here.
http://www.generalhydroponics.com/genhydro_US/biothrive.htmlWhatever....but I don't see how it's supposed to be a money making scam...
I pay way less to mix organic nutes than I do on synthetic nutes. If anything, it's the chemical nutrient market that's trying to capitalize on the sipmplicity of organics. They don't want you to know that you can get the same results or better by paying 1/4 of the price.
Worm Castings, $20I pay way less to mix organic nutes than I do on synthetic nutes. If anything, it's the chemical nutrient market that's trying to capitalize on the sipmplicity of organics. They don't want you to know that you can get the same results or better by paying 1/4 of the price.
Just another chance to say that back when we started really understanding plants physiology and biochemistry, we started with chem ferts. dozens of years ago. Relatively little study done trying to understand how to optimize nature. Huge studies done to advance the multi-billion $ fertilizer (from oil) and consequently pesticide business.but generally speaking, "conventional" methods outperform "organic" in yields which is all most people and corporations care about.
You may be correct but the studies just aren't there yet. I honestly hope they do pin those diseases down to SOME cause.Just another chance to say that back when we started really understanding plants physiology and biochemistry, we started with chem ferts. dozens of years ago. Relatively little study done trying to understand how to optimize nature. Huge studies done to advance the multi-billion $ fertilizer (from oil) and consequently pesticide business.
And these "turn a blind eye" commercial farming practices have ruined the environment. Commercial farming isn't desirable or sustainable. And once again, the latest data shows we've harmed ourselves by blindly eating it for decades. Know an autistic kid? a diabetic? Someone with auto-immune issues? You might thank the commercial food industry.
Diabetes : When the Body Stops producing insolin due to High levels of suger in the blood. there is almost no Diabetes in africa, asia, eurasia or south america, simpley due to the fact that they dont have the sugar content in their foods. North America is going through a diabetes epidemic, which can be DIRECTLY tracked back to the commercial and fast food networks. start to look at labels, dont look at whats in there look at the calorie rating and compair it to the carbohydrates. ALOT of the time its 30%+ Sugar.......I honestly hope they do pin those diseases down to SOME cause.
everything is a chemical, i think the word organic is getting misused, its how the chemical is produced for the plant, ie is it recyled kitchem waste or a salt the production of which had produced lots of co2 or whatever. but yes the shit turned into a chemical for the plant to use it. its organic if it contains a carbon atom?
i figured i would repost it since you didnt read thw whole thing its on the last page.heres one for all you simple people out there to usless to pick up a dictionary.
Organic (or-Gan-ik)
1. Any substance which is derived from Living Matter
2. of, or relating to, any compound containing a carbon Molecule (other than simple bianary compounds, and salts.)
See that "Other Than" SALTS. Hydroponic fertalizers are derived from salts, such as ammonium chloride, calcium chloride, Iron EDTA, and MANY other chemicals that if you were to drink, you would DIE.