the consequences of gay marriage

[DSB65]

here we go again... For fucks sake.

this is for me and crypt................were not gay................................

 

[RawBudzski]

I am not here to spew logic. <3
I am here to add pages onto bucks thread while having fun.
While having no evidence of that claim, I could easily see how if a higher % of gay couples having kids could increase the % of gay kids that result from it.. & I would say it is impossible to see until it happens. We have nothing to compare it too. I could not say for certain it would happen, but you guys could not say for certain it would not. I think it is common sense, just like if we made Marijuana 100% legal to grow & smoke Across the country, I believe more kids would smoke pot due to the availability, so a Kid seeing a Gay couple as regular as a straight couple makes me believe they would be more prone to thinking it was ok, normal.. to be gay.

Not all gays have the Same Reasons for being that way.. some say they were born, some were turned onto it.. some are Bi.. some are just confused.. some are gay now, but will be dating women next year.

I saw Buck ask a question around page 3 that I didn't catch an answer for, I was also wondering the same thing..

Even if it was a choice to be gay, what does it matter?

Budzski, did I see you make the claim that if homosexual people were legally allowed to get married, more people would turn out gay? Take me down logic lane with that one man, I didn't follow..

This is the same kind of thing I see advocates of the drug war mention; that what makes it wrong is the choice, we do it to gain 'pleasure' as opposed to medicinal purposes. Where do they mention the pursuit of pleasure is a bad thing again?

...oh wait...

You cannot tell me some weird gay couples would not get a "kick" out of seeing their baby boy become gay. It would be So00o0o0ooo Fantastic.
You would have Gay men, dressing a young boy to their gay standards? & the kid has a choice?

 

[UncleBuck]

yes guys want pussy

i think you missed his point.

unless of course blowjobs, tittyfucking, handjobs and the like have no appeal to you.

 

[DSB65]

what the hell? No guy wants blowjobs?

i do love blow jobs.....but not from a guy

 

[UncleBuck]

Because of it's etymology. lol For one.

But I don't even agree with the words etymology, so I misspoke, what I meant is that in the 'mutation', it diverged from the gene's intended path. Nothing wrong with that, but it is a fundamental error if you will.

genes don't have an intended path.

they simply mutate, and nature pics the ones that are best suited.

again, poor understanding of how evolution works.

 

[The Cryptkeeper]

Unnatural how? It occurs in nature rather frequently, therefore natural. So if a family of five has blond and brunette children then some of them are unnatural mutants? What if one family member has brown eyes and the others green? Mutants! This is getting silly. I know Raw and Crypt are just having some troll fun so it's rather pointless to continue.

Unnatural in that it isn't the gene's very nature. My post wasn't what I intended to convey. lol The Gay Gene. A fascinating topic but you have thrown me from my intentions in posting in this thread. You are gay, and natural selection made a pretty bold attempt to weed out whatever recessive gene it is that you carry.

 

[UncleBuck]

What the hell? No guy wants blowjobs?

yes please (not form you. sorry. not that there's anything wrong with that).

 

[DSB65]

i think you missed his point.

Unless of course blowjobs, tittyfucking, handjobs and the like have no appeal to you.

any thing with a woman i love.......................

 

[The Cryptkeeper]

gene's don't have an intended path.

they simply mutate, and nature pics the ones that are best suited.

again, poor understanding of how evolution works.

See my other post. I think that evolution is more clever than that. My pseudo-philosophical take on Natural Selection and Gays/Lesbians. =P

 

[Carne Seca]

At least I don't look like a skeleton.. oh wait... I'm pretty damn scrawny....

 

[Carne Seca]

i do love blow jobs.....but not from a guy

whoever blew you would have to do a field sobriety test afterwards.

 

[RawBudzski]

OK finally. I am glad we can all come to an agreement that gay people are the Devil.!.

& Congratz Carne on becoming Straight. <3

 

[UncleBuck]

You cannot tell me some weird gay couples would not get a "kick" out of seeing their baby boy become gay. It would be So00o0o0ooo Fantastic.
You would have Gay men, dressing a young boy to their gay standards? & the kid has a choice?

is it wrong that a straight couple dresses their baby as straight?

is it wrong if a straight couple dresses their baby gay?

is it wrong if a gay couple dresses their baby straight?

who does it hurt?

do we not live in a country where we have the freedom to dress our own kids as we see fit?

do you think that gay couples would act specifically to cause their OWN CHILD harm?

thin about those for a while.

 

[The Ruiner]

yes please (not form you. sorry. not that there's anything wrong with that).

No offense taken...I wasn't offering.

 

[The Cryptkeeper]

whoever blew you would have to do a field sobriety test afterwards.

Dayum.....

 

[Carne Seca]

OK finally. I am glad we can all come to an agreement that gay people are the Devil.!.

& Congratz Carne on becoming Straight. <3

Laughing my (_!_) off.

 

[UncleBuck]

any thing with a woman i love.......................

including her assfucking you with a strap on?

 

[UncleBuck]

See my other post. I think that evolution is more clever than that. My pseudo-philosophical take on Natural Selection and Gays/Lesbians. =P

evolution is not clever. that is anthropromorphizing (<-----not going to bother with correct spelling)

 

[T Ray]

including her assfucking you with a strap on?

Brilliant! I can't stop laughing.

 

[DSB65]

whoever blew you would have to do a field sobriety test afterwards.

why are you fucking with me.....i think you like me....