STAY AWAY FROM LED's!!!!!

zvuv

Active Member
I think we can all agree there isn't an LED light that is commercial-grow worthy yet. It's just not there yet imo. I love LED's, but that's because I setup people with their one, personal little grow tent for personal supply. As of now, I don't grow as a business, or source of income, so LED's are exactly what the doctor ordered.
My guess is that LED grow lights will become a lot more effective and a lot cheaper, (there are huge economies of scale for solid state devices), over the next few years and will eventually displace HID's as the primary choice. But yeah, they aren't there yet.
 

FootClan

Well-Known Member
I think he means you have posted a lot in this thread. Maybe if you didn't make a couple of defensive posts on every single page of this thread people would notice you a little less.
maybe if led users didnt attack others so much i wouldnt have to make a defensive post on every page....
 

FootClan

Well-Known Member
LED users are over-ly aggressive, you're over-ly defensive. Now that we've got that out of the way! How bout these LEDs!
ok thats i can accecpt its not bias its clear and looks at both sides of the problem....I would agree with your statment
 

DrFever

New Member
well i look at it this way i see threads start up LEd grow etc etc but to me it seems there longer grows lol meaning veg times :)) then thread disapears.
until i see a LED do this in 18 days i will stay with my HID lighting:hump:
 

Attachments

Clonex

Well-Known Member
well i look at it this way i see threads start up LEd grow etc etc but to me it seems there longer grows lol meaning veg times :)) then thread disapears.
until i see a LED do this in 18 days i will stay with my HID lighting:hump:
There is nothing in those pictures that led's cant do ?? and im a HID user ? i also thought your last pics on this thread were nice , but irrelavent ? whats your point man lol ?
 

DrFever

New Member
lol your telling me from a 3 " clone and in 18 days there 23" tall :)) good luck dude your talkin comparing 280 watt LEd to 5000 watts of HId with 1550 ppm of C02 goin in every day huh
lol heres a updat pic day 20
 

Attachments

virulient

Active Member
How could I compare 280 watts of LEDs to 1550 ppm of CO2. No really. How?

And 280 vs 5000. At least go 1000 vs 5000. or 2500. or anything in the same ballpark. You really aren't helping your case here. You just look like your bragging about your setup. LED's excel at vegging. If you're going to talk about how much better your HID system is over LED, at least talk about flowering......or canopy penetration.....or something that actually makes sense.
 

Clonex

Well-Known Member
you grew 15 " in nearly 3 weeks ??? im not sure but i don't think any awards are available at present :-)
If you have a HID set up that is vegging your plants say 600w hps or whatever , may i ask you why you have not plants flowering under them , and veg elsewhere , maybe with a decent led panel because unless your just starting out , thats 1 expensive veg room!, the thread topic or at least 1 of them is weather or not LED's are up to being used in a commercial sized grow and if infact enough coverage and penatration is an issue and how led development is coming along , i hope this helps you to join in :-)
 

curly604

Well-Known Member
lol your telling me from a 3 " clone and in 18 days there 23" tall :)) good luck dude your talkin comparing 280 watt LEd to 5000 watts of HId with 1550 ppm of C02 goin in every day huh
lol heres a updat pic day 20
why dont you think about putting hps and led side by side watt for watt? why does hps get the advantage , even at same watt led will run much cooler and will probly not need an a/c unit and watt for watt good leds will match or beat hps in quantity and quality , just gotta do the research to find the right leds.
 

collective gardener

Well-Known Member
why dont you think about putting hps and led side by side watt for watt? why does hps get the advantage , even at same watt led will run much cooler and will probly not need an a/c unit and watt for watt good leds will match or beat hps in quantity and quality , just gotta do the research to find the right leds.

I think watt for watt LED may be able to match HID IF the plants are kept short. This, though, would be where the high cost consideration would come into play for me. I don't think that saving just my cooling costs would justify the high initial costs. The bulb cost is also an issue, but since I started using Digilux's, my yearly bulb cost has been drastically reduced. After 6 months running 12/12 I've lost less than 5% lumens. To offset the high initial purchase price, the LED really needs to save some electricity. I've crunched the numbers, and around 2/3's is the cuttoff point for me at todays prices. In other words, I would need a 650-700watt LED do the same job as a 1000 HID. Also, the penetration issue has to be improved to be usefull in my garden. As a legal med op, I have a limitted plant count. Ideally, no more than 32 plants in every 8x8 tray lit by 4 - 1000 watt HPS's. With that density, my plants need to finish at 36" tall with dense marketable buds down to within 6" of the top of the rockwool block. My HID's give me quite a few 1 gram very dense buds 6" above the rockwool...that's 4.5 feet from the bulb. These plants yield 3 ozs each...all of which are perfect market buds due to carefull pruning at week 2.

My needs are probably more demanding than most. Because of this, I think LED's are still quite a ways off from being a viable alternative for my grow op. But, it does seem that with recent advances in the technology (much of which is simply higher wattage lights), LED's will be showing up in more and more closet and single tray grows.
 

El Superbeasto

Active Member
There's a lot to learn about LEDs. It is not as simple as HPS, bulb plus socket, plus ballast, and reflector.... I'm sure you know this, LEDs run on multiple smaller diodes. Some 120 degree angles lenses, some 90 degree angles lenses, some 60 and 45 degree angles lenses. Then some 1 watt, some 2 watt, some 3 watt. And some even 5 watt... Whatever...

The higher the watt individual diode, the better the penetration. And more importantly, the narrower the lens angle of each diode, the better the penetration. 60 degree penetrates really well (that's what she said). Anything more, you're just spreading your light out too much. It's like trying to spread an HPS out too much. Like 400 watt HPS for a 12 x 12 room. You wont get results...

Anyway, there's a lot of shady LED companies out there. Hydrogrow LED.... Cammie MnKenzie, their owner? Used to be Cameron Scott Wieldraayer, a race car parts salesman before the sex change, (s)he did this because (s)he was dodging the law and those he ripped off. "Mike " from Grow Led Hydro, is also known as Irishboy, a "3rd party" grower doing "grow journals" for "Mike". Promoting his own products... Then there is the Chinese knockoffs... And the insane claims, 90 watts equal 400 watts HID. My fatass it equals that much...

Long story short, I am an HPS user, as well LED. I have dealt with the LED lies, I have spent lots of money on many LED false promises. And have dealt with less than acceptable yields with them... Currently, I am running 3 different LEDs and 1 HPS (400 watt). 2 of the 3 LEDs perform slightly better than CFLs (HTG and Blackstar), and the 3rd, not sure the name brand, I got it used, watt for watt, it performs better than my 400 watt HPS. For larger grows, I cannot see why multiple panels of the same light cannot be possible to cover a larger area. I use 3 to cover a good portion of my grow area. The same can be applied for even bigger areas.

I do agree though, LEDs are expensive. And it is hard to find a good one. Unlike HPS. How long does it take to find a good HPS setup for the un-knowledged? Fast. How long does it take to find a good LED? I speak from experience, a long fucking time. I spent a lot of money, wasted a lot of time, but kept looking, and found good LEDs, though expensive, they perform well.

This is the way I see it: If you are able to manage the heat, HPS is a great option. I've used 400s and 600s, I was happy with them. LED is good if you can not deal with large amounts of heat, but will cost more up front. A lot more. I enjoy my LEDs, they are great in the summer time, it is hot where I live... I like HPS in the winter and cooler months out of the year.

I also agree, LEDs do better with shorter plants than taller plants, but also, each lighting method calls for different growing situations... There are many different growing styles, match your growing style up with your lighting method, and do it right, you'll get the most out of what you're doing.

I'm bored of LED vs. HPS forum arguments, I use both lights, and like both lights. I have stated my opinion of them, and at this time in my life, I choose to use both LED, and HPS in my garden. I get practical results with both.

I think watt for watt LED may be able to match HID if the plants are kept short. This, though, would be where the high cost consideration would come into play for me. I don't think that saving just my cooling costs would justify the high initial costs. The bulb cost is also an issue, but since I started using Digilux's, my yearly bulb cost has been drastically reduced. After 6 months running 12/12 I've lost less than 5% lumens. To offset the high initial purchase price, the LED really needs to save some electricity. I've crunched the numbers, and around 2/3's is the cuttoff point for me at todays prices. In other words, I would need a 650-700watt LED do the same job as a 1000 HID. Also, the penetration issue has to be improved to be usefull in my garden. As a legal med op, I have a limitted plant count. Ideally, no more than 32 plants in every 8x8 tray lit by 4 - 1000 watt HPS's. With that density, my plants need to finish at 36" tall with dense marketable buds down to within 6" of the top of the rockwool block. My HID's give me quite a few 1 gram very dense buds 6" above the rockwool...that's 4.5 feet from the bulb. These plants yield 3 ozs each...all of which are perfect market buds due to carefull pruning at week 2.

My needs are probably more demanding than most. Because of this, I think LED's are still quite a ways off from being a viable alternative for my grow op. But, it does seem that with recent advances in the technology (much of which is simply higher wattage lights), LED's will be showing up in more and more closet and single tray grows.
 

collective gardener

Well-Known Member
There's a lot to learn about LEDs. It is not as simple as HPS, bulb plus socket, plus ballast, and reflector.... I'm sure you know this, LEDs run on multiple smaller diodes. Some 120 degree angles lenses, some 90 degree angles lenses, some 60 and 45 degree angles lenses. Then some 1 watt, some 2 watt, some 3 watt. And some even 5 watt... Whatever...

The higher the watt individual diode, the better the penetration. And more importantly, the narrower the lens angle of each diode, the better the penetration. 60 degree penetrates really well (that's what she said). Anything more, you're just spreading your light out too much. It's like trying to spread an HPS out too much. Like 400 watt HPS for a 12 x 12 room. You wont get results...

Anyway, there's a lot of shady LED companies out there. Hydrogrow LED.... Cammie MnKenzie, their owner? Used to be Cameron Scott Wieldraayer, a race car parts salesman before the sex change, (s)he did this because (s)he was dodging the law and those he ripped off. "Mike " from Grow Led Hydro, is also known as Irishboy, a "3rd party" grower doing "grow journals" for "Mike". Promoting his own products... Then there is the Chinese knockoffs... And the insane claims, 90 watts equal 400 watts HID. My fatass it equals that much...

Long story short, I am an HPS user, as well LED. I have dealt with the LED lies, I have spent lots of money on many LED false promises. And have dealt with less than acceptable yields with them... Currently, I am running 3 different LEDs and 1 HPS (400 watt). 2 of the 3 LEDs perform slightly better than CFLs (HTG and Blackstar), and the 3rd, not sure the name brand, I got it used, watt for watt, it performs better than my 400 watt HPS. For larger grows, I cannot see why multiple panels of the same light cannot be possible to cover a larger area. I use 3 to cover a good portion of my grow area. The same can be applied for even bigger areas.

I do agree though, LEDs are expensive. And it is hard to find a good one. Unlike HPS. How long does it take to find a good HPS setup for the un-knowledged? Fast. How long does it take to find a good LED? I speak from experience, a long fucking time. I spent a lot of money, wasted a lot of time, but kept looking, and found good LEDs, though expensive, they perform well.

This is the way I see it: If you are able to manage the heat, HPS is a great option. I've used 400s and 600s, I was happy with them. LED is good if you can not deal with large amounts of heat, but will cost more up front. A lot more. I enjoy my LEDs, they are great in the summer time, it is hot where I live... I like HPS in the winter and cooler months out of the year.

I also agree, LEDs do better with shorter plants than taller plants, but also, each lighting method calls for different growing situations... There are many different growing styles, match your growing style up with your lighting method, and do it right, you'll get the most out of what you're doing.

I'm bored of LED vs. HPS forum arguments, I use both lights, and like both lights. I have stated my opinion of them, and at this time in my life, I choose to use both LED, and HPS in my garden. I get practical results with both.
Good post. I am aware that several LED's are available that can compete with 400 watt HPS's. The real test, though, is the 600 watt HPS equavalant...and then, of course, the 1000. The 400 watt HPS just doesn't quite have enough lumens to pump out piles of great buds. When they finally rolled out the 600 watt HID grow light, I was thrilled. The 600 seems a fine balance between brute force, and managability of heat. I believe that all LED makers should strive to develope lights that can perform on the same level as the 600 watt HPS. While I personally grow with 1000's, most of my commercial growing friends grow with 600's. If an LED was available that TRULY performed like a 600 watt HPS is all aspects, we would start seeing them in commercial grows. These guys are NOT hurting for cash. A $40,000 capitol investment in the grow room would not be out of the question for any of my group...so long as it made sense.
 

Josh3235

Well-Known Member
See, you have 8 LED panels. There is your mistake right there most likely. you got a shitty brand!!! Its your fault, just gotta find the right brand of LED. I love my 240w blackstar. It works wonderful for the money that I payed for.
 
Top