They've confirmed the effect with an atomic clock on a jetliner.
Yet I pointed out the atomic clock experiments as evidence weeks ago. Even raising one clock slightly higher than another makes them go at different rates based on how close they are to the gravity well of Earth.
What causes the larger effect - (the difference in) gravity or angular velocity? cn
I would have to calculate both the dilation d/t velocity - easy (radius = 6378km, radius'= 6378.01km for a 10 meter height difference), as well as the dilation d/t gravity using Einstein Field Equations - way over my head.
No you didn't. You just said that atomic clocks measured that.
They didn't test them with high speed but with normal, everyday air travel speeds. Speeds that are a fraction of a percent of c. The difference is still measurable. That's the whole point is that we don't have to travel to close to light speed or travel to a black hole to see and measure the effect of time dilation, an effect that you were claiming was imaginary or something.
I mentioned atomic clocks and time dilation three times in the Mayan thread. Both Mexiblunt and Ginjawarrior posted specifics about the Hafele and Keating Experiment and the effects of time dilation on our own GPS satellites. Here are the posts since you obviously missed them. Link Link
No I didn't. Must be more of your lack of comprehension of something else that I said because I know things fall at the same rate in the same gravitational field. I do know that no theory, gravity or otherwise, has ever been proven and never will be because science doesn't prove things, only disprove them.
Lol. NOO.
Dude, don't claim I said some bullshit I didn't say unless you can prove it. I'm not gonna let you get away lying about what I said. You're memory is faulty. I understand how gravity works. Why in the world would I say that that G is different for different objects? You're not making sense. G is different for different planets and moons as your video clearly demonstrates G on the moon is much less than G on earth. Most of your replies demonstrated you didn't understand what I was saying anyway. Saying that theories are never proven is true. You were trying to say that Eddington proved Einstein and I corrected you to say that Eddington confirmed a portion of Einstein's theory but that doesn't 'prove' the theory correct because theories are never proven correct. The discussion was about semantics but you kept thinking I was saying the theories were wrong or some bullshit like that. Like I said, you didn't understand what I was saying until I posted a magazine article to explain it better but you insisted on continuing to argue and how you got to think I said things fall at different rates I can't figure out.
You did say that. I even remembered the thread and tried to find it. Sorry I couldn't, but I do remember.
Yes, I did say that, but not what you claimed I said a few posts up. Yes, nothing is proven, and your point? There is no such thing as speed of gravity and I'm not the only one that had to correct you on that issue. There is acceleration due to gravity but that acceleration is mass dependent. Acceleration is the rate that speed increases so there is no speed of gravity. Acceleration happens to be a bit less than 10m/s^2 on earth but even you can see from the video that it is much less on the moon. You are wrong claiming that I said that things accelerated at different rates in the SAME gravitational field. You're faulty memory does not give you an excuse to lie about what I said.
Everything falls at the same SPEED, due to gravity.
And I don't have a faulty memory/
