when shit like that is put in front of me i cant deny it.
You should always apply consistent doubt and scrutiny when things are placed in front of you. Otherwise, any conclusion you come to will lack validation. This is hard to do with subjects such as evolution, quantum physics, and ancient history. We can't exactly become experts just to prove our intuition correct. What we can do is educate ourselves about the process of science. Even if we do not fully understand the material, we can examine the process used and search for errors. Beyond that, we depend on peer review.
The first thing we notice about ancient aliens theory is that it does not even begin to pass peer review. There are no experts in these fields who are baffled to the point of grasping for alien explanations. There are a few non-experts who are not following the scientific method making a lot of noise. When we really listen to these noise makers, we hear many logical fallacies, false appeals and dressed up speculation.
you mentioned nothin about the monuments that were shown that cant be explained by any kinda modern measure. to me thats all the proof i need for me to say thats how it coulda gone.
In other words, all the proof you need that aliens figured out a way to conquer the unimaginable distance between galaxies, noticed our planet, decided to help our people, and then vanished, is some old structures with impressive architecture. While it is understandable why you have come to this conclusion, it is not scientific. It is saying "I can't understand this, therefore aliens", which is a conclusion that very rarely leads to the truth. It is no more scientific than saying, "I can't understand this, therefore God". Ancient aliens theory appears to be scientific, but it is simply sloppy, biased, and uninformed analysis, or in other words, pseudoscience.