Anonymous Takes On A Cartel

The Cryptkeeper

Well-Known Member
I agree up to a certain point, but the US is in no position to destablize a bordering country, that's just not on the radar. Furthermore, the Mexican govt won't allow the US to project force en masse because it would be a sign of weakness.

The problem with Anonymous' plan was the lack of actual source verification, the chances were that it would pretty much just put out a lot of bad info, potentially endanger innocent people, and NOT achieve the release of their comrade.

I hate to break to you die-hard suporters, but Anonymous is not able to bring down Zetas. There has been banners hanging (next to dead people) spelling out what politician met with those dead guys hanging right next to them...what's happened? Not a damn thing. If you release names, you might actually HELP the Zetas (or even other cartels, there are about a dozen majors). The cartels are not dependent on the internet, therefore cyber-attacks will in the end accomplish NOTHING. If Anonymous had a super-powerful militia able to project power anywhere in the world at anytime, then they might have a chance at "stopping the cartels," but until that day - they will be entirely ineffectual, and only risk themselves by attempting to engage ultra-violent cartels.

This is just reality.
LOL Anonymous wasn't threatening a cyber-attack. Just throwin' that out there. lol It was very much a real attack that was as old as human history. We all know if Anonymous was a branch of the military they would be more suited to an Intelligence Agency, spies, Ninjas. :lol: Counter-Intelligence. :p
 

The Ruiner

Well-Known Member
LOL Anonymous wasn't threatening a cyber-attack. Just throwin' that out there. lol It was very much a real attack that was as old as human history. We all know if Anonymous was a branch of the military they would be more suited to an Intelligence Agency, spies, Ninjas. :lol: Counter-Intelligence. :p
How is the release an "attack?" How would that affect day-to-day operation of the Zetas?

And as far as the last sentence...how do you know that they weren't started by an intel-op?
 

The Cryptkeeper

Well-Known Member
How is the release an "attack?" How would that affect day-to-day operation of the Zetas?

And as far as the last sentence...how do you know that they weren't started by an intel-op?
Are you really saying that all 'attacks' affect all the day to day operations of the entity attacked?

How do you know they were. ;)
 

The Ruiner

Well-Known Member
Are you really saying that all 'attacks' affect all the day to day operations of the entity attacked?

How do you know they were. ;)
Wouldn't disruption be a goal? Wouldn't they want to "bring down" the people who did harm to their comrade? Wouldn't they want to have SOME affect? Isn't that the entire point?

I still haven't come across one bit of good that they have done with their stunts, if anything it serves a beacon for increased internet controls...

I never asserted that they were, I was proposing that they could have been an intel-op creation...not that they are indefinitely.
 
Top