I never said cut em off man. I said alternating nodes does not equal less nodes. And even tho I admit a clone is not necessarily a higher yielder, it IS more potent and it DOES develop faster. Can you just keep in mind that a clone is an exact genetic replica of the original plant. The same amount of leaves and stems to the exact same root ball size. The difference is you're cutting out a month of veg time.
As for the original poster I'd still go with clones man. You don't need mothers but you would still need a veg and flower space. If space is limited but veg below the flower space and put black plastic between them.
The benefits for you would still be potency, dialing in of the plant (you know from previous grows exactly when and what it needs with no surprises), guaranteed female, and a better than average plant assuming you pick the best of a bunch. You can take a clone of a clone forever theoretically. Some people on this board have the same plant going 20 years later.
As for the original poster I'd still go with clones man. You don't need mothers but you would still need a veg and flower space. If space is limited but veg below the flower space and put black plastic between them.
The benefits for you would still be potency, dialing in of the plant (you know from previous grows exactly when and what it needs with no surprises), guaranteed female, and a better than average plant assuming you pick the best of a bunch. You can take a clone of a clone forever theoretically. Some people on this board have the same plant going 20 years later.