Death Penalty For Gays: Ron Paul Courts The Religious Fringe In Iowa

[sync0s]

I think using who a person running for office has around them either way is bs. You guys realize these are politicians right they suround themselves with whatever agenda they are trying to push. It's sad that their being vote whores matters less than what who they are around means. I don't think RP is a saint but I really don't get why if he hated gays, blacks, Jews, whites or others,he can't just man up and say it. All this political pandering just makes me worry this guy will be buissness as usual. I keep hearing how he is a stick to his guns guy, but then everything bad he's done is explained away as oh he didn't know or that's not how he feels anymore. I don't know it just seems like the same damn thing we have now. I'm not Paul bashing just pointing out some huge problems I see on this new pseudo messiah just like I saw with Obama.

Ron Paul supporters spend too much time doing exactly that. Ron Paul only gives the answer "I didn't write them, that's my answer" and tries to move on.

Again, so what if he is/was racist?

No person is perfect. We all have our own character flaws, and it takes a sociopath to deny that. Ron Paul is no Messiah. He is just a smart guy with good intentions and a clear record of honesty.

 

[fenderburn84]

Right on. It's just the way people talk about this man is very unsetteling. They talked that way about Hitler too and that backfired big time, and no I am not calling RP Hitler, just stating a fact that forces me to examine much more closley this man.

 

[Canna Sylvan]

Too bad I can't shut down this thread. I'm not even a Ron Paul cultist and I can see this thread for what it is. This thread is nothing but hate. Funny thing is Ron Paul would get rid of the federal ban on gay marriage. Obama hates gays. But Paul wants to let them marry, then execute them....

 

[UncleBuck]

Too bad I can't shut down this thread. I'm not even a Ron Paul cultist and I can see this thread for what it is. This thread is nothing but hate.

lol.

ron paul's campaign touts the support of someone who has argued for the execution of homosexuals, and to point out such is simply hate?

LOL!

Funny thing is Ron Paul would get rid of the federal ban on gay marriage.

but he would be perfectly OK with states enacting a gay marriage ban, right?

he argues the 10th amendment although in this case it would be a clear violation of the 14th.

ron the paul is not so enamored of the constitution, only the parts he likes.

Obama hates gays.

care to cite some evidence to back up this outrageous claim?

But Paul wants to let them marry, then execute them....

that is not what anyone believes.

however, a whole lot of people do believe that because ron paul's campaign TOUTED the support of this person, it reflects very badly on him.

it is not as if this person chose to support ron paul and his campaign said nothing. his campaign proudly touted this.

if ron paul sucks this bad at running a campaign (and newsletters, for that matter), what makes you think he would be any good at running the country?

but go on, use hyperbole and false characterizations since that is all you have.

 

[budlover13]

Right on. It's just the way people talk about this man is very unsetteling. They talked that way about Hitler too and that backfired big time, and no I am not calling RP Hitler, just stating a fact that forces me to examine much more closley this man.

Don't think for a second that this thought has not been deeply pondered by me many times.

 

[Canna Sylvan]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZrYT5igYus&feature=youtube_gdata_player

He struggles with gay marriage! He doesn't struggle with shit. His response should be it's none of his business what a gay or straight couple does like Ron Paul has said several times. I get Obama's speech told to me as a vegan. I just walk away from them. If a man likes another man's meat, he should be allowed it and I should be allowed my veggies without smirks too.

 

[UncleBuck]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZrYT5igYus&feature=youtube_gdata_player

He struggles with gay marriage! He doesn't struggle with shit.

he has stated that his views are "evolving". being publicly in favor of gay marriage in 2008 would have meant unelectable, or at least a much tougher path to 270.

i believe that his stated position does not match his personal views. i could be wrong, but i feel this is reasonable based on his actions as president.

there are some things you just can't say if you want to be elected.

His response should be it's none of his business what a gay or straight couple does like Ron Paul has said several times.

i agree. however, if you want to make this about ron paul instead, please do. we can talk about how inept his campaign is for not only accepting, but touting the nomination of not only a homophobe, but someone who wants to kill them. he TOUTED that.

also, we can talk about hr 7955, in which he makes sure no federal funding is given to any institution which may suggest that being gay is acceptable lifestyle. he made no such provisions to block federal funding to any institution that suggests that a man and a woman getting married is acceptable. so he clearly has a record of discriminating against gays (not to mention his newsletter fiasco, which also proves how shitty ron paul is at running a campaign).

I get Obama's speech told to me as a vegan. I just walk away from them. If a man likes another man's meat, he should be allowed it and I should be allowed my veggies without smirks too.

clever.

what if a beaver wants to eat a taco? i bet you love that.

 

[Canna Sylvan]

clever.

what if a beaver wants to eat a taco? i bet you love that.

What should I care what people in Oregon eat? Here in California I can eat a mean vegan taco from scratch.

 

[deprave]

What about all the other descent famous people that agree with Ron Paul, How does that add up in comparison with crazy people that support Ron Paul, It seems like everyone agrees with Ron Paul to me, I have yet to hear any real valid reason with the exception of disagreeing with capitalism entirely. There is a lot of straw men, yellow journalism, and conspiracy theories but nothing really that legitimate in my opinion. As far as supporting one of the other candidates over him.


[video=youtube;ZBoKsn-ntxM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBoKsn-ntxM&feature=related[/video]

[video=youtube;xoqY6CpgpSE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoqY6CpgpSE[/video]

 

[sync0s]

Too bad I can't shut down this thread. I'm not even a Ron Paul cultist and I can see this thread for what it is. This thread is nothing but hate. Funny thing is Ron Paul would get rid of the federal ban on gay marriage. Obama hates gays. But Paul wants to let them marry, then execute them....

Your the one who started a thread about Muslims being dogs..

 

[Canna Sylvan]

Your the one who started a thread about Muslims being dogs..

Because I was tired of that racist and bigot, fenderburn84, thinking his is justified. I was just curious if he and those like him would vote yes in an anonymous poll.

Ever hear of satire, like South Park does? Maybe its creators actually think that way?

#215
fenderburn84
420 TIME
Stoner


Join Date:
Sep 2011
Posts:
532
Journal Entries:
4

Oh really now you as well? Maybe you should try reading the posts the thread. I have never said my prejudices were okay or cool I'm just being honest wich I guess in your opinion means I am an evil zionist huh? Why would you make an ass of yourself trying to stir up the pot when you haven't even read the whole thing? And you wonder why people would have a negative view of Muslims? This is by far the most humours attempt at logic I have ever heard. And just so ya know I don't hate all Muslims but there are some that deserve what they get. I am in a state of pure pity for you. I hope you have a good argument instead of the same things the others have said.

#1
Canna Sylvan
Ganja Smoker
Pot Head
Join Date:
Oct 2011
Posts:
381
Join Date:
Oct 2011
Posts:
381
Are all muslims dogs?
Some people on here are claiming being a muslim alone qualify as dog status. Who are you?

I don't know, I guess I called muslims dogs. Shrugs.

 

[Carne Seca]

Oh look, Ron Paul is posing with Don Black, the director of Storm Front. Don't they look chummy.

The American Free Press, which markets books like “The Invention of the Jewish People” and “March of the Titans: A History of the White Race,” is urging its subscribers to help it send hundreds of copies of Ron Paul’s collected speeches to voters in New Hampshire. The book, it promises, will “Help Dr. Ron Paul Win the G.O.P. Nomination in 2012!” Don Black, director of the white nationalist Web site Stormfront, said in an interview that several dozen of his members were volunteering for Mr. Paul’s presidential campaign, and a site forum titled “Why is Ron Paul such a favorite here?” has no fewer than 24 pages of comments. “I understand he wins many fans because his monetary policy would hurt Jews,” read one.

 

[NoDrama]

we can talk about how inept his campaign is for not only accepting, but touting the nomination of not only a homophobe, but someone who wants to kill them. he TOUTED that.

You keep using that word, touted, but i don't think you know what it means. The RP campaign is not touting anything. A person who just so happens to work for the RP campaign has garnered support from a 3rd party, that is a personal thing, has nothing to do with "Touting" from the RP campaigners. If you can show multiple news articles directly quoting RP using this 3rd party endorsement then you can call it touting, but if all you rely on is this BS article of lies and the subsequent news show where the moron says he wants to kill gays, hahahahaha that is totally laughable, i am pretty sure you don't believe it either but just like to play along with anything anti RP.

toutedpast participle, past tense of tout (Verb)

Verb:

Attempt to sell (something), typically by pestering people in an aggressive or bold manner: "Jim was touting his wares". Attempt to persuade people of the merits of (someone or something).

 

[Carne Seca]

Touting:

“We welcome Rev. Kayser’s endorsement and the enlightening statements he makes on how Ron Paul’s approach to government is consistent with Christian beliefs. We’re thankful for the thoughtfulness with which he makes his endorsement and hope his endorsement and others like it make a strong top-three showing in the caucus more likely,” said Ron Paul 2012 Iowa Chairman Drew Ivers.
Dr. Kayser has degrees in education, theology and philosophy/ethics. He is the author of over 40 books and booklets. The name of one organization that he founded describes well his ministry: Biblical Blueprints. His passion is to see the comprehensive blueprints of the Scriptures applied to science, civil government, education, art, history, economics, business, and every area of life.



​

 

[NoDrama]

Touting:

“We welcome Rev. Kayser’s endorsement and the enlightening statements he makes on how Ron Paul’s approach to government is consistent with Christian beliefs. We’re thankful for the thoughtfulness with which he makes his endorsement and hope his endorsement and others like it make a strong top-three showing in the caucus more likely,” said Ron Paul 2012 Iowa Chairman Drew Ivers.
Dr. Kayser has degrees in education, theology and philosophy/ethics. He is the author of over 40 books and booklets. The name of one organization that he founded describes well his ministry: Biblical Blueprints. His passion is to see the comprehensive blueprints of the Scriptures applied to science, civil government, education, art, history, economics, business, and every area of life.



​

A one time statement is not touting, its a one time statement. Obviously you did not read the definition, it is neither pestering, bold or aggressive.

Lets take a look at the endorsement shall we? Find the part where he likes Ron Paul because of Gay hating and wanting to put them to death.

I support Ron Paul as the Republican candidate for president for a number of reasons. The first reason is that he is the only candidate who holds to a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution (i.e., that the Feds can only do what is explicitly enumerated in the Constitution) whereas the other candidates hold to a broad constructionist interpretation (i.e., that the Feds may do whatever is not explicitly forbidden in the Constitution). It is broad constructionism that has gotten us into the mess we are in today, and you cannot fight liberal broad constructionism with conservative broad constructionism. Both lack integrity.
The second reason is that he is the only candidate that has a consistent philosophy of economics that will truly resolve America’s problems. The economics of each of the other candidates is flawed, and in my opinion grossly unbiblical.
The third reason is that Ron Paul’s strictly Constitutional civics is far closer to Biblical civics than any of the other candidate’s on a whole range of issues including non-interventionism in international politics, limitations on what can be a crime, limits of jurisdiction, the rights of interposition and civil resistance, inflation, banking cartels, the national identity card, the American Community Survey, the use of torture by the military, etc.

So you see that gay part?

 

[fenderburn84]

Damn man your bs post got shut down and you come after me? I'm sorry you can't read I really am. If you pick apart and choose half statements and mis quote your beloved RP I'm guessing you could up with some crazy stuff as well. And don't be mad at me that no one bite on your little thread man that's not my fault. You really are a sad person huh?

 

[UncleBuck]

You keep using that word, touted, but i don't think you know what it means. The RP campaign is not touting anything. A person who just so happens to work for the RP campaign has garnered support from a 3rd party, that is a personal thing, has nothing to do with "Touting" from the RP campaigners. If you can show multiple news articles directly quoting RP using this 3rd party endorsement then you can call it touting, but if all you rely on is this BS article of lies and the subsequent news show where the moron says he wants to kill gays, hahahahaha that is totally laughable, i am pretty sure you don't believe it either but just like to play along with anything anti RP.

toutedpast participle, past tense of tout (Verb)

Verb:

Attempt to sell (something), typically by pestering people in an aggressive or bold manner: "Jim was touting his wares". Attempt to persuade people of the merits of (someone or something).

you are right and i am wrong. touting is not the right word.

ron paul's campaign is BOASTFUL about the endorsement of someone who believes in executing homosexuals.

better?

 

[budlover13]

you are right and i am wrong. touting is not the right word.

ron paul's campaign is BOASTFUL about the endorsement of someone who believes in executing homosexuals.

better?

How about Ron Paul's campaign is simply informing the public of yet ANOTHER endorsement?

 

[UncleBuck]

How about Ron Paul's campaign is simply informing the public of yet ANOTHER endorsement?

would you be proud if a pedophile endorsed your presidency? would you BOAST about that?

romney has WAY more endorsements, and his come from kingmakers, not bigots.

 

[budlover13]

would you be proud if a pedophile endorsed your presidency? would you BOAST about that?

romney has WAY more endorsements, and his come from kingmakers, not bigots.

If i had no choice in the matter of who a given group that i despise endorses and they chose to endorse me then i would cordially acknoledge the endorsement and move on. As the campaign did. To deny it or not acknowledge it would THEN be reason for scandal imo.