Death Penalty For Gays: Ron Paul Courts The Religious Fringe In Iowa

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
If i had no choice in the matter of who a given group that i despise endorses and they chose to endorse me then i would cordially acknoledge the endorsement and move on. As the campaign did. To deny it or not acknowledge it would THEN be reason for scandal imo.
that's funny.

if someone who called for the execution of homosexuals endorsed me, the last thing i would do is to announce how pleased i was by such. i would not even acknowledge it. most campaigns would.

i guess that's what sets ron paul apart. he is really shitty at running campaigns. another reason why he is so incredibly unelectable.
 

budlover13

King Tut
that's funny.

if someone who called for the execution of homosexuals endorsed me, the last thing i would do is to announce how pleased i was by such. i would not even acknowledge it. most campaigns would.

i guess that's what sets ron paul apart. he is really shitty at running campaigns. another reason why he is so incredibly unelectable.
i could see you saying something to the tune of "I don't like them or agree with them and they can keep their endorsement! They have no right to have a say in politics anyway!"
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
i could see you saying something to the tune of "I don't like them or agree with them and they can keep their endorsement! They have no right to have a say in politics anyway!"
maybe not the last sentence, but yeah, i would walk away from that if i did anything at all.

likely i would just let it die a quiet death and go away.
 

budlover13

King Tut
maybe not the last sentence, but yeah, i would walk away from that if i did anything at all.

likely i would just let it die a quiet death and go away.
The last sentence is my opinion on what you would be advocating by ignoring the endorsement.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
So what do you think of this one? You think this one makes obama a racist? GTFO w/ your strawman BS

LOL!

jeremiah wright spoke against the type of things that stormfront would do.

he spoke against jim crow laws, interment of japanese during ww2, and said "god damn america" for said grievances.

the picture itself is of no matter, as anyone can buy a ticket to a politician's fundraiser and get a photo with them for a nice donation. this is how politics work, and ron paul is a politician.

the fact that you tried to confuse the issue by equating jeremiah wright with stormfront is downright laughable. as laughable as the thought of ron paul winning the presidency, much less even seriously threatening the nomination.

thus, i LOL!
 

deprave

New Member
They are both allegedly racist, no idea who they are, I don't follow girl gossip and entertainment weekly. You think its funny I make the comparison, its the exact same shit as 2008 with Obama, now its Ron Paul...
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
They are both allegedly racist, no idea who they are, I don't follow girl gossip and entertainment weekly. You think its funny I make the comparison, its the exact same shit as 2008 with Obama, now its Ron Paul...
no, it is not the exact same.

jeremiah wright is not allegedly racist. his 'god damn america' speech spoke out against racism. and i dare you to go to stormfront and tell me that they are anything like reverend wright.

you are trying to make a false equivalence. quite desperately in fact. any other straws you want to grasp at?
 

deprave

New Member
as I said, I don't know who these people are and I don't care, all I know is they are both allegedly racist and they both had pictures with presidential candidates and people said that makes them racist.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
as I said, I don't know who these people are and I don't care, all I know is they are both allegedly racist and they both had pictures with presidential candidates and people said that makes them racist.
stormfront is full of people who want to re-implement jim crow laws.

rev wright spoke out against jim crow laws.

as you said, you don't know or care, but i know and care. you are being a troll to try to make stormfront and a social justice preacher equivalent. just plain nuts.
 

deprave

New Member
Did Fox not try to say he was racist hate speaker like all of 2007? What is it that he even said? I am sorry I just thought it was really stupid and dismissed it at the time.
 

Carne Seca

Well-Known Member
I can see the comparison. Prepubscent taunting is very similar to advocating and condoning the murder of an entire class of people because you're uncomfortable with your chubby when you think of Neighbor Bob or Coworker Stan. I find that quite true. So what if your hate spewing rhetoric diguised as "religious views" spawns hate crimes and discrimination across the nation. It's all about making Ron Paul look good to the public regardless of who he hangs with or who he allows to publish hate speech in his newsletter. Which, in my opinion, is similar to polishing a turd. No matter how hard you rub, all you're going to get is more shit.

Yes, I do see the similarities.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
I can see the comparison. Prepubscent taunting is very similar to advocating and condoning the murder of an entire class of people because you're uncomfortable with your chubby when you think of Neighbor Bob or Coworker Stan. I find that quite true. So what if your hate spewing rhetoric diguised as "religious views" spawns hate crimes and discrimination across the nation. It's all about making Ron Paul look good to the public regardless of who he hangs with or who he allows to publish hate speech in his newsletter. Which, in my opinion, is similar to polishing a turd. No matter how hard you rub, all you're going to get is more shit.

Yes, I do see the similarities.
Ron Paul hangs out with Don Black? I don't think so, a picture of the 2 posing together means diddly squat.
 

budlover13

King Tut
stormfront is full of people who want to re-implement jim crow laws.

rev wright spoke out against jim crow laws.

as you said, you don't know or care, but i know and care. you are being a troll to try to make stormfront and a social justice preacher equivalent. just plain nuts.
C&P from a response my a FB friend:

FACT: Ron Paul has never supported or been a member of Stormfront.




Ron Paul cannot check the personal views of all his many donors.



A Stormfront member donated to Ron Paul in 2008 and Ron Paul refused to return the money.



Ron Paul would rather spend donated money to promote the message of freedom and tolerance, than return it and thereby allow Stormfront members to spend it in ugly ways.

... DETAILS:
Many Donors: Ron Paul receives a massive amount of donations from more individuals. During Paul's 2008 GOP Presidential Campaign bid he received support from over 130,000 individual donors. So far, in 2011 Paul has raised most of his money from donors who gave less than $200 each. To elaborate further, donors who give less than $200 to a campaign are not required to disclose their employer or occupation. To investigate the personal viewpoints of each donor would be impractical for any campaign, and is particularly impractical for a campaign that receives many small donations rather than fewer large donations.

Stormfront Member Donation: In late 2007, a member of Stormfront, Don Black, gave $500 to Ron Paul's Presidential Campaign. When the connection to Stormfront was identified after review of the FEC reports, the campaign was asked whether it intended to return the money. A spokesman for the Ron Paul 2008 Campaign said that the money would not be returned--for reasons to be discussed in the next paragraph.

Better Use for the Funds: "If someone with small ideologies happens to contribute money to Ron, thinking he can influence Ron in any way, he's wasted his money," Paul spokesman Jesse Benton said. "Ron is going to take the money and try to spread the message of freedom."Paul's 2008 Presidential Campaign is therefore stating that to give the money back would be the equivalent of funding Stormfront--instead, it would be more reasonable to put the money to better use as opposed to putting it back in the hands of a white-supremacist organization.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
stormfront is full of people who want to re-implement jim crow laws.

rev wright spoke out against jim crow laws.

as you said, you don't know or care, but i know and care. you are being a troll to try to make stormfront and a social justice preacher equivalent. just plain nuts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremiah_Wright_controversy

" Obama was specifically asked by Bill O'Reilly if Reverend Wright had said white people were bad, to which Obama replied 'no.' [29][30][31] In his book Dreams from my Father, Obama had quoted Reverend Wright as saying in a sermon 'It's this world, where cruise ships throw away more food in a day than most residents of Port-au-Prince see in a year, where White folks' greed runs a world in need.'"

Obama can't even remember what he put in his own book, yet you say Paul is unfit for not keeping track of a newsletter not written by him. GTFO, as you like to say. Negligence for not keeping track of other's writings or snorting so much blow you forget what you wrote, which would be worse....

Wright is just as much a hate filled nitwit as the members on stormfront. Black hate is better because it's only letting off steam?

Paul only had a picture, when did he ever say he had stormfront friends? Obama has personsal friends who he said were friends that are both terrorists and hate spreaders.
 

deprave

New Member
I can see the comparison. Prepubscent taunting is very similar to advocating and condoning the murder of an entire class of people because you're uncomfortable with your chubby when you think of Neighbor Bob or Coworker Stan. I find that quite true. So what if your hate spewing rhetoric diguised as "religious views" spawns hate crimes and discrimination across the nation. It's all about making Ron Paul look good to the public regardless of who he hangs with or who he allows to publish hate speech in his newsletter. Which, in my opinion, is similar to polishing a turd. No matter how hard you rub, all you're going to get is more shit.

Yes, I do see the similarities.
It has nothing to do with Ron Paul...Its the haters that win you just hate people for no damn reason...This is all clearly yellow journalism....and you take the bait..I feel really bad for you.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
...This is all clearly yellow journalism....
this is an article about how ron paul's campaign guy in iowa boasted of an endorsement from a very undesirable person.

no one is stating that they believe ron paul wants to execute gays. i do not believe that ron paul wants to execute gays.

ron paul executing gays is the last thing i would think of...when i think of ron paul executing gays, it seems unlikely.

now that it is established that ron paul executing gays is out of the picture, i will say this:

although it is unlikely that ron paul would execute gays, his campaign management seems completely off. fucking amateurs.

ron paul does not seem to be able to run a competent campaign. he is so bad with handling a campaign, what with the whispers of ron paul's campaign boasting about the support of someone who would execute gays and all, that is just adds to the unelectability factor.

did anyone else see the vid that jon untsman put out on him? spot on.
 
Top