stormfront is full of people who want to re-implement jim crow laws.
rev wright spoke out against jim crow laws.
as you said, you don't know or care, but i know and care. you are being a troll to try to make stormfront and a social justice preacher equivalent. just plain nuts.
C&P from a response my a FB friend:
FACT: Ron Paul has never supported or been a member of Stormfront.
Ron Paul cannot check the personal views of all his many donors.
A Stormfront member donated to Ron Paul in 2008 and Ron Paul refused to return the money.
Ron Paul would rather spend donated money to promote the message of freedom and tolerance, than return it and thereby allow Stormfront members to spend it in ugly ways.
... DETAILS:
Many Donors: Ron Paul receives a massive amount of donations from more individuals. During Paul's 2008 GOP Presidential Campaign bid he received support from over 130,000 individual donors. So far, in 2011 Paul has raised most of his money from donors who gave less than $200 each. To elaborate further, donors who give less than $200 to a campaign are not required to disclose their employer or occupation. To investigate the personal viewpoints of each donor would be impractical for any campaign, and is particularly impractical for a campaign that receives many small donations rather than fewer large donations.
Stormfront Member Donation: In late 2007, a member of Stormfront, Don Black, gave $500 to Ron Paul's Presidential Campaign. When the connection to Stormfront was identified after review of the FEC reports, the campaign was asked whether it intended to return the money. A spokesman for the Ron Paul 2008 Campaign said that the money would not be returned--for reasons to be discussed in the next paragraph.
Better Use for the Funds: "If someone with small ideologies happens to contribute money to Ron, thinking he can influence Ron in any way, he's wasted his money," Paul spokesman Jesse Benton said. "Ron is going to take the money and try to spread the message of freedom."Paul's 2008 Presidential Campaign is therefore stating that to give the money back would be the equivalent of funding Stormfront--instead, it would be more reasonable to put the money to better use as opposed to putting it back in the hands of a white-supremacist organization.