Who Else Knows That Ron Paul will NEVER be President?

[londonfog]

If I was denied service at a drug store to pick up much needed medication ..I was done harm

 

[UncleBuck]

Everything I said pertains to the Civil Rights movement.

pot smokers and interring the japanese has to do with civil rights?

LOL!

keep grasping at straws.

 

[UncleBuck]

If I was denied service at a drug store to pick up much needed medication ..I was done harm

according to parker, the only way to harm you is to cause you physical harm. so unless they punched you in the face when you tried to pick up your athlete's foot treatment, stop crying, you baby!

 

[Parker]

that private property is supposedly "open to the public".

so my house is open to the public. People can come and go as they please right? Think for once.

your definition of harm as being purely physical is naively narrow.

It is not my definition, it is THE definition. You're the one trying to redefine it.

if i run a construction business and am denied service at the top shelf supply store because of the color of my skin and am thus forced to shop at the second hand supply store, than my business has been harmed.

says who? Are you saying what you want to purchase can only be made by one person? Thats silly.

more insults

Only you can insult right princess

bigots have the right to be bigots UNTIL it infringes on the rights of others, which empirical evidence shows us was the case.

You dont even know the difference between a right and a privilege so I doubt you know what empirical means. Since you don't understand the topic why keep yapping?

notice how i articulated a rebuttal WITHOUT using insults? take a lesson.

You didn't articulate, you made up some bullshit. YOU dont get to redefine what a right is in order to fit your blinded agenda. You cannot come up with one response to what Ive said. Up is down, left is right, in your world of using force to get what you want.

discrimination caused harm. outlawing it via civil rights WORKED. historical fact.

Government caused the discrimination that you rail against, FACT Government uses force to violate the rights of one group in order to favor another group FACT

riddle me this: when did they stop publishing the green book for negro travelers?

I don't know what the green book is and I dont count on you to hear the truthful reason either. You make things up and you've been wrong to often, you use force to get what you want, why would I want to listen to you?

i am not rewriting anything. you are the one trying to define harm as purely physical. i am reminding you that harm need not be purely physical.

Yes you are rewriting. You redefined rights. If I don't give you one of my cookies, according to you that is harming you. You're incorrect.

so stop insulting or i will simply delete your posts.

Lead by example quit insulting others and expecting them to not do it. if you stop I will. You insult people who follow Ron Paul and expect us to ignore those insults. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

 

[Parker]

pot smokers and interring the japanese has to do with civil rights?
LOL!
keep grasping at straws.

It is the use of force in the disregard of property rights. LOL! become informed and you wont be grasping at straws.

 

[londonfog]

Parker who the phuck is coming in your house taking your property ????

 

[Parker]

If I was denied service at a drug store to pick up much needed medication ..I was done harm

So if you don't have money and the store wont give it to you, you are being harmed too then right?

 

[Parker]

Parker who the phuck is coming in your house taking your property ????

No one hopefully and I hope no one does it to you either. with all the shit I give you and UB I do not wish any harm on you two ever.
If the feds come in and take my plants they are taking my property. if anyone comes into my house uninvited they are abusing my property. The castle doctrine speaks about defending property.
I guess by now you have figured out I am very aggressive about always defending liberty and freedom even the inconveniences that come with it. even bigoted dumbasses deserve the same freedoms everyone has. Because someone is an asshole or just disagrees with you they still deserve freedom. You can basically say what you want, that is freedom. I dont have to agree with you. But I wont use force stopping you.

 

[londonfog]

So if you don't have money and the store wont give it to you, you are being harmed too then right?

Wow you really grasping today... why don't I have the money ????..what is it that I need ???

 

[londonfog]

No one hopefully and I hope no one does it to you either. with all the shit I give you and UB I do not wish any harm on you two ever.
If the feds come in and take my plants they are taking my property. if anyone comes into my house uninvited they are abusing my property. The castle doctrine speaks about defending property.

Dude I agree with you on that...I'm talking about public property doing interstate commerce...do you understand Title II of the Civil Rights Act ..hell have you even read the Civil Rights ACT ?????

 

[UncleBuck]

so my house is open to the public. People can come and go as they please right? Think for once.

do you advertise your house as "open to the public" in the same fashion that a restaurant or gas station does?

think for once.

It is not my definition, it is THE definition. You're the one trying to redefine it.

physical harm is not the only definition of harm. go gat a dictionary and tell me what it says.

says who? Are you saying what you want to purchase can only be made by one person? Thats silly.

ok, so since i am not allowed to buy construction supplies for my business, i can just get someone else to do it for me? what the fuck are you trying to get at?

i gave you a clear example of harm not being purely physical.

Only you can insult right princess

besides saying "fuck you" one time for your repeated attempt at rewriting/denying history, i have not insulted you once.

you do it repeatedly.

You dont even know the difference between a right and a privilege so I doubt you know what empirical means. Since you don't understand the topic why keep yapping?

again, i have the right to swing my fist. do i still have that right when your face is in the way?

Government caused the discrimination that you rail against, FACT Government uses force to violate the rights of one group in order to favor another group FACT

state governments helped cause the discrimination, fed gov stepped in and stopped it. they did not favor one group over another, they leveled the field for all groups.

get your facts straight and quit repeating talking points that i have rebutted several times over. it gets tiresome.

I don't know what the green book is and I dont count on you to hear the truthful reason either. You make things up and you've been wrong to often, you use force to get what you want, why would I want to listen to you?

the green book for negro travelers was a guide that helped blacks find gas stations that wouldn't charge them double, hotels that would actually let them rest their heads for the night, and the like.

they didn't need to keep publishing it after civil rights passed. you can verify this account with the slightest of research.

Yes you are rewriting. You redefined rights. If I don't give you one of my cookies, according to you that is harming you. You're incorrect.

this cookie example is dishonest and you know it.

wanting to be treated the same as the next guy even though my skin may not be the same color is not asking for a cookie.

you do not have the right to cause harm to others, that is where rights END.

what part of this do you not understand?

Lead by example quit insulting others and expecting them to not do it. if you stop I will. You insult people who follow Ron Paul and expect us to ignore those insults. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

show me all these insults.

 

[Parker]

according to parker, the only way to harm you is to cause you physical harm. so unless they punched you in the face when you tried to pick up your athlete's foot treatment, stop crying, you baby!

agreed lol actually mental harassment can be considered harm too.

 

[UncleBuck]

So if you don't have money and the store wont give it to you, you are being harmed too then right?

why are you purposely making up shit that has nothing to do with the argument?

 

[Parker]

why are you purposely making up shit that has nothing to do with the argument?

I answered his hypothetical question with a related hypothetical question. How is that making shit up? You react to much to me instead of the posts. You have a thing about me don't you.

 

[UncleBuck]

agreed lol actually mental harassment can be considered harm too.

how about denying someone service based on the color of their skin?

 

[Parker]

do you advertise your house as "open to the public" in the same fashion that a restaurant or gas station does?

obviously if a restaurant doesn't want to serve a segment of society they are not advertising being open to the public.

think for once.

an insult wahhhhhh lol

physical harm is not the only definition of harm. go gat a dictionary and tell me what it says.

I mentioned mental harassment in another post.

ok, so since i am not allowed to buy construction supplies for my business, i can just get someone else to do it for me? what the fuck are you trying to get at?

Make what you need or buy it elsewhere. Quit trying to say there is only one place to get that product.

i gave you a clear example of harm not being purely physical.

besides saying "fuck you" one time for your repeated attempt at rewriting/denying history, i have not insulted you once.
you do it repeatedly.

understood you get to make the rules about how many times you can insult someone. Like I said you're a control freak. You insult followers of Ron Paul often, saying otherwise is dishonest especially with all your posts that do it. Bcause my insults are better or hit home harder you're mad?? Dont be jealous.

again, i have the right to swing my fist. do i still have that right when your face is in the way?

again I already answered that, Why ask if you dont read the post

state governments helped cause the discrimination, fed gov stepped in and stopped it. they did not favor one group over another, they leveled the field for all groups.

wrong again. The Feds put Japanese Americans in camps during WW2. The Feds also made quotas which favored a group based on appearance not on accomplishment.

get your facts straight and quit repeating talking points that i have rebutted several times over. it gets tiresome.

you have no facts, just incorrect definitions you make up and expect others to buy into your little world.

the green book for negro travelers was a guide that helped blacks find gas stations that wouldn't charge them double, hotels that would actually let them rest their heads for the night, and the like.

they didn't need to keep publishing it after civil rights passed. you can verify this account with the slightest of research.

why would I care to research it? It means little to me. Because you say so it means something to me?

this cookie example is dishonest and you know it.

why becasue you say so? Once again you tell others what they really mean because YOU think you know what others think better than they do. You keep making the same mistakes repeatedly.

wanting to be treated the same as the next guy even though my skin may not be the same color is not asking for a cookie.

there is nothing wrong with wanting to be treated the same as others. using force to get it is wrong. Many people today still have to face that same issue. It's not just about skin color or sex, it's also about religion and economic differences.

you do not have the right to cause harm to others, that is where rights END.
what part of this do you not understand?

You're the one who doesnt understand. You claim you are against harming people yet you use force to get what you want. You agree with fining people and throwing them in jail using force even though those peoples rights have not been violated. Only reason is you disagree with them as well a don't understand what a right is. YOU don't get to redefine rights.

show me all these insults.

I bolded it for you in this post. You either aren't very bright or you think others are not. Either way you're wrong.

 

[Parker]

how about denying someone service based on the color of their skin?

It's mean but doesn't cause harm. Harm means physical not ruffle someones feathers. That's why I mentioned how mental harassment can turn into physical harm.
I dont agree with it and that place has a far greater chance of going out of business. I'd love it if there were more places that discriminated. I'd open up shop right next door and serve everyone and make tons of money.
Because I stand up for something doesn't mean I agree with the philosophy I am standing up for. I don't agree with being gay but a person has the right to be gay and have gay sex.
it's never about me it's always about freedom and liberty. If you disagree with something fine but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.

 

[UncleBuck]

Make what you need or buy it elsewhere. Quit trying to say there is only one place to get that product.

so because my skin is a different color than the other guy, i need to make my own 2x4s and power drills?

the type of discrimination that went on before civil rights was passed caused harm. your "rights" cease to be rights when they cause harm to others.

my right to swing my fist ends at your face.

deal with it.

 

[UncleBuck]

It's mean but doesn't cause harm.

history tells a different tale.

denying people service based on their skin color caused harm.

why is it so hard for you to accept this mundane historical fact?

 

[londonfog]

I give up for now ...off to play Madden or something