http://watchdog.net/p/ron_paul/contrib-employers
So there you go. Not a lot of money, but then again Ron Paul isn't much of a candidate, so giving him more would be a waste. If Ron Paul was viable, Goldman Sachs would be giving him a ton of cash. But why would they want to give a ton of cash to a loser?
Actually it's not, you just don't want to believe these things about your lord and savior.
As would Ron Paul if he were president. It's easy to have high morals when you're a political joke. I doubt Ron Paul could even get a meeting with a Goldman Sachs VP, let alone hire one.
Well it's president Obama, not king Obama. A king is a form of autocrat who gained power through nepotism. Obama is the democratically elected president of the United States.
The fact is that Ron Paul would give Goldman Sachs every thing they ever wanted. Deregulation and no limitations on profits. So as much as I'm disappointed in the way Obama has dealt with Goldman Sachs, Paul would be 10000000 times worse.
Actually I have. But your complete and total ignorance isn't allowing you to see that. You don't even really understand what Ron Paul is advocating, which is something I find truly bizarre. All you know is that he's your glorious leader and you should blindly support anything he's ever said or done.
Read the letter Paul wrote about Gramm-Leech-Bliley. It's scary stuff. He voted against it because it was too restrictive. lol. That's insane.