Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
And I said Texas, Cali, and Colorado.
Are you even IN any of those states?
So you don't ever ever ever ever ever go into a USPS store, how the fuck should you know ANYTHING about them???
Wow.
And I said Texas, Cali, and Colorado.
Are you even IN any of those states?
You didn't say priority boxes at first. And maybe they do IN YOUR STATE.THEY GIVE THE PRIORITY BOXES AWAY THERE TOO........
SO YOU ARE STILL DANCING AROUND THE FACT THAT THEY GIVE YOU THE PRORITY BOXES FOR FREE AND THE PRIORITY TAPE...No matter how many times you tell me I'm wrong.
I have walked in the post office, and had to buy tape, and seen everything else for sale. I always have my own boxes and stuff though.
They sell sharpies, boxes, envelopes, if you ask for tape, they tell you to buy some.
LolSO YOU ARE STILL DANCING AROUND THE FACT THAT THEY GIVE YOU THE PRORITY BOXES FOR FREE AND THE PRIORITY TAPE...
Nothing in the US Constitution mandates having a postal service, what constitution are you reading? LOLHaving a Postal service is mandated by the Constitution. Nothing in the Constitution says it has to turn a profit or even break even.
article 1 section 8 clause 7, kiddo.Nothing in the US Constitution mandates having a postal service, what constitution are you reading? LOL
Ross Perot tried to buy the Postal Service years ago, problem was then and is now, way too many Vets and Minorities working there. All of them would lose their jobs, just look for Congress to continue to bail them out. Just something we are saddled with.So if you haven't heard the USPS is running out of money.
If nothing is done they will go broke, and have to shut down. This could be within five years.
This would mean no more postcards, thank you letters, or anything like that. It would cost $10 flat to FedEx it...And jail will have to start letting people call whoever they want, instead of having a calling list of like 3 people that you have to choose. It would just be cruel and unusual punishment, to not let you write family.
I've got an idea though.
Public Transportation should be going out of business too, because to many people use cars. But they have people paying them for ADVERTISING.
Public buses, or light rails have ads inside, outside, and at the stations.
The post office needs to "Sell Out".
Companies need to start paying to have their logos on stamps, or envelopes. On postal cars, public mailboxes, and the post office itself.
If they advertise for people, they can survive. And companies can advertise like that, instead of sending you so much shitty mail everyday.
Unless congress bails them out...That's another option...
LMAO, that's not a mandate, Kiddo!article 1 section 8 clause 7, kiddo.
Hey Bucky, if you're still looking for that post office mandate in the constitution, it's on the shelf between your 25% federal tax return and $50 healthcare insurance, Kiddo! LOLLMAO, that's not a mandate, Kiddo!
A power is not a mandate, I believe is the point made earlier. Hard to disagree with that.The USPS is constitutionally mandated government entity. The Postal Clause (in which UB supplied the location of in the Constitution) makes it so. It gave congress the enumerated powers to create what we call the USPS.
Article 1 - The Legislative BranchThe USPS is constitutionally mandated government entity. The Postal Clause (in which UB supplied the location of in the Constitution) makes it so. It gave congress the enumerated powers to create what we call the USPS.
???? dude enumerated powers are powers that are set aside for Congress nothing more nothing less... Congress has this enumerated power to establish postal roads and offices per a Constitutionally authoritative command which by definition is a mandate... Now are you going to argue that an authoritative command is not a mandate by definition ?Lol no, I wasn't joking. Now, if you want to say that because of what is written in the Constitution that Congress has an ethical mandate, or a moral one, to create post offices you would have a stronger argument. But enumerated powers are not mandates to act. If it weren't in there then there would certainly be an argument against the gov't ability to create POs, but it does not say they must.