He never said he wrote it, he never said he agrees with it. Learn to comprehend and not lie douchebag. We're not dumb like you, you just think we are.
my claim in this thread has been that ron paul defended those racist newsletters as his own writings. although this does mean that he "said he wrote it", i am not claiming he actually wrote them (or agrees with them). someone else wrote those newsletters, i believe, but ron paul still defended them.
you would be well-advised to take your own advice.
i.e. How dare Ron Paul be an honest politician who takes the blame, I would much rather a politician lie to my face and tell me he isn't responsible.
... and what do you win by voting for another empty suit?
he was honest by admitting he lied, but that just brings into question what is the lie.
there's also the long history of congressional insider trading, the inability to understand how segregation is not just a "bad thing", but also unconstitutional, the whole thing where he calls the homosexual lifestyle unacceptable, also fails to understand how DOMA is unconstitutional.
Now y'see that right there? That right there is what gets me completely steamed about politics today. What happened to ethics, hmm? In my day, once a congressional insider got bought he STAYED bought, or penalties were exacted. And now they're trading'em!! O mempora; o tores! cn
Segregation is a bad thing. Sexuality issues(discrimination) is a problem as we all have a right to representation. I'm sure there are skeletons, many in all the closets of these candidates. Hell I got a few myself. What troubles me is the party lines we have to choose from and the limited discussion of issues. If more parties were involved in the process this could change the outcome. The fact that the people have no free election other than a mock election, while electoral votes make the real choice upsets me. As does the limited choices we have to look at in the election. I would like to see a green party and or an independant with combined debates and discussions which include all parties involved. I understand this would take more time but it could allow candidates with no prior political service a platform to bring forth issues for discussion that would never be heard under the present system. Like when the soldier asked Bush when they would get the vehicles with armor instead of the unarmored ones they had. I would like those types of questions to be asked and under the present system we do not have this except with Paul.
Interesting..
Its called having principles you front runner.
Your claimn is a lie. He NEVER EVER defended them or said he did. You have no proof.
I do You on the other hand troll and lie because you have nothing.
Ron Paul never admitted it. That is a lie. You have no proof of it. Someone told you and you believed them.
somebody did tell me, his name is ron paul.
another lie, this never happened. You don't even have any evidence that is close to this happeneing
another lie of yours he has spoken out against it and has said MLK and Rosa Parks are heros of his. It issoceitys role not government. Racist control freaks like you thought government banning interracial marriage and Jim Crow laws were a good thing. If government stays out of doing societies job those things dont happen.
another lie. his policy is on the foundation of what our country was founded on. Property rights. As far as title 2 goes which is the part of the CRA he was opposed to (thats another thing you dont know shit for brains) govenment does not own its citizens so it cannot order them to work for others. Only a twat like yourself would want to go back to plantation policy and use force to make someone work for another.
another lie. He doesn't base his decisions on his beliefs. He basis it on if the Constitution grants him the authority. He doesn't believe in taken drugs but they should be legal. Lie some more, its funny.
that's another lie. His position has been to keep government out of the marriage business. No one should have authority over anothers life and tell them they cannot marry. You also cannot use force to make someone accept your marriage.
Only if you believe a troling liar like you.
Sure you're a liar. Ron Paul never admitted it. He regrets not paying closer attention to something that went out under his name. That is what he said. Nothing more nothing less. Your vid proves nothing. He never said he said those things and you have no proof accept someone wrote an article. Someone said he did and you're just dumb enough to believe it. Thats on you. After all you believed obama when he said the recovery package would work and unemployment would hit 8 percent.
Another lie. You conitinue to make things up in order to make yourself look better. Face facts you're a loser.
Oh no what will I ever do without you feeling sorry for me. douchebag
Sure you're a liar. No other supporters of Ron Paul believe your garbage. Only those with agenda driven blinders try to pass on bs as truth.
every ron paul supporter here believes it because i presented factual evidence of it. there is video, there is an article which ron paul tells you to read in that video, the article is legit.
I can't believe you guys are still arguing this topic, but I resent your statement. I am a Ron Paul supporter and I know that he did admit to it in the past, and he said because of campaign reasons. This is actually an incredibly pointless thing to argue as it absolutely means nothing.
He didn't admit to writing the articles or having knowledge about them when they came out you tool. He said he found out about them AFTER the fact and he listened to advisors that said to not bother commenting on it as he wasn't in office and there was no reason to comment on it as no good will come out of it.
I dont need your permission to do anything