londonfog
Well-Known Member
No link simple means you have ZERO credibility ... so cliffey do you have a link to this or did you hear this off another forum ???He was treated by the stanford fire department.
No link simple means you have ZERO credibility ... so cliffey do you have a link to this or did you hear this off another forum ???He was treated by the stanford fire department.
Im getting my information from the police report.You on the other hand are just making shit up.You can't "smack the shit out of someone" ( as you put it) for following you.Ive posted several links in this thread most which have went by with little mention.Your camp on the other hand just keeps spouting the same things over and over with no factual evidence to back up your claims.Don't hold your breath for it. And the irony of all this is that under the "stand your ground" law the kid would have been justified in smacking the living shit out of some mouthbreathing cretin following him.
Interesting. I suggest you all read the transcripts then come back with your verdicts of guilty/not guilty.https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/326700-full-transcrip​t-zimmerman.html
Read the transcript for yourself...
dude WTF IS THAT.. something official pleaseInteresting. I suggest you all read the transcripts then come back with your verdicts of guilty/not guilty.
I missed your links ...I would really like to see them. Can you start with the police report.Im getting my information from the police report.You on the other hand are just making shit up.You can't "smack the shit out of someone" ( as you put it) for following you.Ive posted several links in this thread most which have went by with little mention.Your camp on the other hand just keeps spouting the same things over and over with no factual evidence to back up your claims.
http://cnninsession.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/martinpolicreport.pdfI missed your links ...I would really like to see them. Can you start with the police report.
UB, you keep citing 776.041, so I decided to read it. It does not exactly support your guilty verdict:i have enough information to know who initially provoked the situation, and it was the overzealous cop wannabe with the gun who followed the unarmed kid with the skittles.
if zimmerman stays put, martin goes home and eats skittles. that is inarguable.
once you initially provoke the situation, you have very few exceptions under 776.041, and zimmerman qualified for neither exception.
thank you ....This trial will be very interesting..Don't get me wrong Zimmerman is quilty as shit..just going to be interesting to to how it plays out.
He temporarily stepped down.He didnt have to,he chose to actually. funny how you can twist the facts.cliffey Please don't tell me that Yahoo video is your only source.. Dude ZERO CREDIBILITY. Wheres the police report..thats something you read ..wheres the details on him being treated by the Fire Dept. Funny how the Chief had to step the fuck down. This whole police dept is about to be exposed.
clearly you have no idea the legal definition of "stalking".Again if I stalk you waking down yhe street you confront me and I kill you its your failt?
If you read the police report then you know that officer Ricardo Ayala states that Zimmerman shirt back was wet like he had been laying on the ground, his nose was bleeding and the back of his head was bleeding, and that he was treated on the scene by "SFD". This corroborates the eye witness account that Trayvon was on top of Zimmer beating him.thank you ....This trial will be very interesting..Don't get me wrong Zimmerman is quilty as shit..just going to be interesting to to how it plays out.
I will bet the grand jury indicts him as well. There is simply too much political pressure here to fail to indict. I see 776.041 (thanks, UB!) as Zimmer's successful defense in a trial.i bet the grand jury sees it much differently...i bet in less than 2 weeks this turd zimmerman is arrested
Not defending Cliffey here, but he did give a link to the police report. You ought to read it and then read UB's helpful link to the law.OH REALLY , perhaps you better examine the self defense laws there Bubbette , following someone and harassing them entitles the individual to a modicum of self defense availabilities. Thats a FACT not " making shit up".
And YOU of course are a mouthbreathing cretin of much the same stripe as Zimmerman and it SHOWS here quite clearly.
too bad they collected absolutely ZERO evidence of this fact. all we have is the word of an obviously corrupt police force with a questionable history of treatment towards blacks.If you read the police report then you know that officer Ricardo Ayala states that Zimmerman shirt back was wet like he had been laying on the ground, his nose was bleeding and the back of his head was bleeding, and that he was treated on the scene by "SFD". This corroborates the eye witness account that Trayvon was on top of Zimmer beating him.
Don't get me wrong, I don't know if Zimmerman is guilty of anything. I agree, it will be interesting to see how this plays out.
Someones on top of you raining haymakers to your face while you scream for help isn't a threat of great bodily harm? how can you escape from your back? The beating stopped because of the bullet.no, because in addition to fearing either death or great bodily harm, zimmerman must have exhausted all reasonable means to escape. that's not possible due to the location of the murder. and a bloody nose is by no means "great bodily harm", unless of course you are an apologist pussy for zimmerman.
Someones on top of you raining haymakers to your face while you scream for help isn't a threat of great bodily harm? how can you escape from your back? The beating stopped because of the bullet.