ganjames
Well-Known Member
NameStructure Binding affinity for the CB[SUB]1[/SUB] receptor Binding affinity for the CB[SUB]2[/SUB] receptor THC
K[SUB]i[/SUB] = 40.7±1.7 nm[SUP][26][/SUP] K[SUB]i[/SUB] = 36.4±10 nm[SUP][26][/SUP] Cannabicyclohexanol
K[SUB]i[/SUB] = unknown. Reported to be 5 times more potent than THC, based on physiological responses in rats[SUP][27][/SUP] HU-210
K[SUB]i[/SUB] = 234 pM (100–800 times more potent)[SUP][28][/SUP] JWH-018
K[SUB]i[/SUB] = 9.00±5.00 nm[SUP][26][/SUP] K[SUB]i[/SUB] = 2.94±2.65 nm[SUP][26][/SUP] JWH-073
K[SUB]i[/SUB] = 8.90±1.80 nm[SUP][26][/SUP] K[SUB]i[/SUB] = 38.0±24.0 nm[SUP][26][/SUP] AM-2201
K[SUB]i[/SUB] = 1.0 nM[SUP][29][/SUP] K[SUB]i[/SUB] = 2.6 nM[SUP][29][/SUP]
I found this chart on the 'Pedia. Synthetic cannabinoid-oids found in "spices" fall into two classes: the naphthoylindoles, which are dead easy to prep, and the tetrahydrobiphemyls, of which good ol' THC is the natural archetype. cn
there's a lot of these "AM" verities as well, and knowledge on some of these?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AM-2233