SirLancelot
Active Member
ok good point, not enough sufficient data. but I still just can't tear away from the fact that everything that begins to exist has a cause, and something can't come from nothing.
But, how can you say its a fact? To me it's more courageous to say there is no "because," no answer to "why?" that is presently known. Not in science, not in Religion, and not in any other belief or practice. Some advertising copy writer said it best, I think. Why ask why? It can come from nothing but we can't yet define nothing. And if you are talking about causality in time, then you must know, at least, in quantum math, causality is not at all necessary for existance.ok good point, not enough sufficient data. but I still just can't tear away from the fact that everything that begins to exist has a cause, and something can't come from nothing.
Is it not just as plausable, that existence has always existed, rather than existence spawning from nothing?ok good point, not enough sufficient data. but I still just can't tear away from the fact that everything that begins to exist has a cause, and something can't come from nothing.
Isn't the prohibition of Moses to have no other god before the one true GOD? So, there is only one God, right? No this god or that one, no my god or yours.How would you handle the situation? I bet he doesn't either
Just for clarification your talking about the Christian god right?
But I can't think of anything that comes out of nothing,Is it not just as plausable, that existence has always existed, rather than existence spawning from nothing?
Yes those thoughts are correct, but you forgot about the thought of string theory, and multiple universes, which could make the "existence has always existed" theory even more plausible. Whos to say this universe is the only one?But I can't think of anything that comes out of nothing,
ahh now were getting tricky and having to deal with definitions, what exactly is existence and always existing? I thought the general consensus was that the Universe began 13.75 ± 0.11 billion years therfore the universe began.
Right but that's a theory, for simplicity Im just sticking to the things that we can actually observe and from my knowledge something doesn't appear from nothing.Yes those thoughts are correct, but you forgot about the thought of string theory, and multiple universes, which could make the "existence has always existed" theory even more plausible. Whos to say this universe is the only one?
all your doing tho is passing the question down the line. where did god come from? he couldnt have appeared from nothing...Right but that's a theory, for simplicity Im just sticking to the things that we can actually observe and from my knowledge something doesn't appear from nothing.
Yes it is very likely that many planets are capable of life, a few have been all but confirmed to have the correct conditions. So I accept that the universe could support much life. Since we know nothing about alien life, it could exist in such a way that if one (or more) of the cosmological constants were changed, it wouldn't matter. So while the universe may seem fine tuned for human life, it's not an observation we can make about any other life outside of earth. Other life may see it as 'broad tuning'.ah touche! maybe the goal isn't human life in particular but life in general including bacterias and other living single celled organisms. I think there's a general consensus among astrologists that there's billions of solar systems similar to ours that are capable of supporting life this is what I meant by the universe supporting human life
and look up quantum fluctuations stuf does appear and dissapear from seeeming nothing and thats test ableall your doing tho is passing the question down the line. where did god come from? he couldnt have appeared from nothing...
Good one
But, why does god have to come from, or go to for that matter? No need for gender or appearance, right? For me there is NOW. There is no sequencing necessary. As IT was in the beginning, IT is NOW and ever shall be. Word without end.all your doing tho is passing the question down the line. where did god come from? he couldnt have appeared from nothing...
no god is necessary either infact he's superfluous and wasnt the premise that "something cant come from nothing"? you cant wave that away by denying sequencing or time NOW isnt an answerBut, why does god have to come from, or go to for that matter? No need for gender or appearance, right? For me there is NOW. There is no sequencing necessary. As IT was in the beginning, IT is NOW and ever shall be. Word without end.
good point and I struggle with this one as well, the only argument I've ever heard on this point is that God has always existed and never "began" to exist. I find this uneasy to digest though.all your doing tho is passing the question down the line. where did god come from? he couldnt have appeared from nothing...
It would seem odd to accept perpetual existence for the question of God, and not the question of the universe. If god made the universe, he must be even more complex and fine tuned himself, meaning we wave off the 'design' of god for the same reason we question the design of the universe.good point and I struggle with this one as well, the only argument I've ever heard on this point is that God has always existed and never "began" to exist. I find this uneasy to digest though.