UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
hey soldier, you feeling lucky tonight?
Main Stream Media Now admitting Ron Paul will be on the Ballot in Tampa
- Thread starter deprave
- Start date
It doesn't matter which group it is you imbecile. He doesn't have the authority to do it and he always votes for lower taxes. Who is going to pay for this? Rules do mean something to normal people. He is consistant just like you are a consistent douchebag.
What a lying sack of shit you are. You wouldn't know facts if it hit you in your big trolling backside. Ron Paul never mentions what you said at the 5:10 mark and he never mentions writing the articles since he didn't
Only reason you are against him is because you are pro war mongering Israel and anti Muslim. Why don't you move to Israel and fight for your country? or are you too much of a pussy?
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Do US Military personel not swear an Oath to defend the Constitution from enemies foreign and domestic? By speaking up (under the 1st) is he not serving his duty? And by arresting him, would they not be the aforementioned domestic enemies to the constitution (by denying that soldier his 1st Amendment rights) ??
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
It's a date. We can get high first. When the feds bust us, you'll get death and I'll get a one year sentence and a $1,000 fine. I'll be sure to tell my cell mate how great the sex was. So your memory will live on.hey soldier, you feeling lucky tonight?
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
He has a duty to protect the constitution, not get favors from it. It's like how the eunuchs protect the harem, but don't get to fuck them, not like they could anyway
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Is defending the Bill of Rights not considered defending the Constitution? Or are we playing semantics "all up in here"?
jsamuel24
Active Member
I know its alot to ask, but please read what i said,
"Of course by the time they were done with you, your right it wouldnt mean shit to them, but for you, it would mean at the very minimum a other then honorable dischage, and at worst a couple of decades doing truely hard time at Ft. Levinworth."
The least allready has happened. Ask the Sgt. from Camp Pendelton what happens when you disreguard UCMJ and talk bad about the CIC. I listed the worst case because you seemed to be the type from your very own words that would not only violate the UCMJ of endorcement in Uni, but would most likely commit many other offences since you have no reguard for law and rules.
To continue with this, do I support the craptastic war we are in right now, Not one little bit, but the members of the US military are what keeps this country safe each and every day, even when we do things that make little to no sence and when it is unpopular. Of course Republicans forget that they were the ones who took us to war, and they like to leave it on Obama's doorstep, but I digress.
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
You can go in uniform and protect peaceful protestors from getting beat by corrupt cops, like what happened at Occupy. But you can't engage in your own speeches about the event's topic.
I don't agree with it, but those are the rules. Which is why I despise our military.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
So if asked a question it's just "no comment" regardless?
jsamuel24
Active Member
That would be correct. There are PR folks the military has that takes all questions. Common soldiers are not permited to answer.
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Doesn't Ireland have mandatory inscription?
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
What are we supposedly obliged to get inscribed?
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Conscription. Sorry, I'm damn tired.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Lol, we're neutral and don't piss anyone off...we have like 12,000 professional soldiers and havnt been attacked intentionally (Luftwaffe bombed Dublin, mistaking it for London) since the foundation of our State...
Why would we conscript people?!
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Sweden hasn't fought anyone in forever (1814), but only ended conscription about two years ago.
deprave
New Member
Sorry to break up this conversation thats been repeated 5,000 times on here....but .....more news....
Ron Paul will now win washington and north dakota!
updated tally for delegate final counts:
-Minesota - Ron Paul declared winner
-Iowa - Ron Paul declared winner
-Alaska - Ron paul Declared winner
-Louisiana - Ron Paul Declared winner
-Mas - Ron Paul Declared winner (Primarily a Primary State so these delegates only get to vote for Dr Paul in second round)
-Washington - Ron Paul to be declared winner
-North Dakota - Ron Paul to be declared winner-
-Maine - Ron Paul very likely to be declared winner
-Nevada - Ron Paul likely to be declared winner
-Missouri - Ron Paul likely to be declared winner
-Colorado - Ron Paul and Mitt Romney Split 50/50
Ron Paul will now win washington and north dakota!
updated tally for delegate final counts:
-Minesota - Ron Paul declared winner
-Iowa - Ron Paul declared winner
-Alaska - Ron paul Declared winner
-Louisiana - Ron Paul Declared winner
-Mas - Ron Paul Declared winner (Primarily a Primary State so these delegates only get to vote for Dr Paul in second round)
-Washington - Ron Paul to be declared winner
-North Dakota - Ron Paul to be declared winner-
-Maine - Ron Paul very likely to be declared winner
-Nevada - Ron Paul likely to be declared winner
-Missouri - Ron Paul likely to be declared winner
-Colorado - Ron Paul and Mitt Romney Split 50/50
jsamuel24
Active Member
So I have been looking since yesterday and I cannot find your source. Where are you getting these numbers as I cannot find anything to back up your numbers anywhere.
Snooch
deprave
New Member
I know its kind of difficult because the main stream media generally blacks out Ron Paul but you can go to the links provided on the first page of this thread, the "Ron Paul is winning" thread, you can watch Maddow, you can go to dailypaul.com and that will get you started with some sources. Only local news reports(and apparently Rachel Maddow) it so all the sources are local newspapers/stations websites only unfortantely, I am getting my numbers from the local articles found from google news and various forums, the blackout of Ron Paul continues.
last nights maddow:
I have a bit different numbers then her but I think this was probably recorded a few days ago and everyone's numbers seem different granted, she gives a general overview of whats going on and illustrates how Ron Paul and his supporters are taking over the GOP.
[video=youtube;UQMtlah4Iec]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQMtlah4Iec[/video]
last nights maddow:
I have a bit different numbers then her but I think this was probably recorded a few days ago and everyone's numbers seem different granted, she gives a general overview of whats going on and illustrates how Ron Paul and his supporters are taking over the GOP.
[video=youtube;UQMtlah4Iec]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQMtlah4Iec[/video]
jsamuel24
Active Member
Interesting since at least 1 state on their own website says your numbers are completely wrong. Here is a link to Mass's numbers that are being reported by the secretary of state. http://www.sec.state.ma.us/ele/eleres/res12idx.htm. Paul didnt take a single district in Ma. Yes I am aware that the delegates do not have to vote the way the state tells it to, but I dont see any way that Paul will take the nod. I cant stand Paul or Rom, but the will of the people sure as hell isnt behind paul. Anyways since the numbers that the Secretary of State of most of the states dont check out with what your preaching I find that this thread is no longer worth reading or responding to since it seems more like a dream then a reality. Wow, I wish I wouldnt have read any of this, now I have to agree with UB about the Paul maniacs and I really never wanted to agree with UB ever.
Snooch