james76208
Member
I am and have always been non religious but a few years ago {not going into spooky story}i had a ghostly encounter and it shattered everything i knew
Just wandering if i wasn't alone
Just wandering if i wasn't alone
It kinda hard to listen evidence such as crash sites being located across the world, if that evidence is kept secret. Is there anything that would distinguish this claim from fantasy?
Remote viewing would be extremely simple to demonstrate and prove. We simply place an object or a written note some place isolated and the viewer tells us what he sees. In fact, a number of magicians and skeptics do that very thing. They keep an object hidden in a safe place, and ask remote viewers to identify it. Several of them offer a reward for the correct answer, and there is always the JREF million dollar prize.
So considering that remote viewing would be extremely simple and very lucrative to test, no one has shown even the slightest ability. It would seem rather strange for this to be so if remote viewing were true............................................................................................Your lack of information on the U.S.remote viewing program is blinding.The locating of the crashed U.S.plane was widly reported when the program was declassified. Why do U say the crash is secret I didn't say so, and U don't know....Remote viewing HAS been tested(don't tell me U didn't know that).Some people consistently out perform random chance in controled tests.I hardly think a magicians performance is a valid test.
Dude, dont even bother explaining anything, your just giving these guys an erection because they thrive on pointing out the "flaws" in what us "woo woo's" say.It kinda hard to listen evidence such as crash sites being located across the world, if that evidence is kept secret. Is there anything that would distinguish this claim from fantasy?
Remote viewing would be extremely simple to demonstrate and prove. We simply place an object or a written note some place isolated and the viewer tells us what he sees. In fact, a number of magicians and skeptics do that very thing. They keep an object hidden in a safe place, and ask remote viewers to identify it. Several of them offer a reward for the correct answer, and there is always the JREF million dollar prize.
So considering that remote viewing would be extremely simple and very lucrative to test, no one has shown even the slightest ability. It would seem rather strange for this to be so if remote viewing were true.......Your lack of information on the U.S.remote viewing program is blinding.The locating of the crashed U.S.plane was widly reported when the program was declassified. Why do U say the crash is secret I didn't say so, and U don't know....Remote viewing HAS been tested(don't tell me U didn'tknow that).Some people consistently out perform random chance in controled tests.I hardly think a magicians performance is a valid test.
You don't think placing an object in hiding and then asking the viewer to describe it is a valid test? What exactly did they do when they found the airplane? Was it not hidden somewhere and they were asked to see it?Your lack of information on the U.S.remote viewing program is blinding.The locating of the crashed U.S.plane was widly reported when the program was declassified. Why do U say the crash is secret I didn't say so, and U don't know....Remote viewing HAS been tested(don't tell me U didn'tknow that).Some people consistently out perform random chance in controled tests.I hardly think a magicians performance is a valid test.
notice how you cannot speak against anything said in the video. if its wrong must be easy for you to disprove anything they have to say.xD atheists turning the "closed-minded" argument on us, how cute =)
Someone who believes in a higher power? If theres ghosts than theres spirits. There has to be something thats organizing these spirits, not that we are under its control, we are our own Gods, those who watch over us just have more experience, Im sure we'll be smoking blunts with Buddha one day as his equal.so what would someone call an atheist that believes in ghost
Able to think on more than 1 level.Right or wrong.so what would someone call an atheist that believes in ghost
the Bible recognizes ghostsi just cant put ghost in a scientific class to explain what it is.I don't believe anything godly is behind
That video does nothing to disprove my words. Every single supernatural claim that was ever made falls under the categories this well spoken British guy presents? Gimme a break. Its silly to think that all those millions and millions of people must be mistaken, because for ONE to be right about what they experienced (just one) it would go against your view on reality.notice how you cannot speak against anything said in the video. if its wrong must be easy for you to disprove anything they have to say.
i'll just hold my breath for it
you really had no idea at all what he was saying did you?That video does nothing to disprove my words. Every single supernatural claim that was ever made falls under the categories this well spoken British guy presents? Gimme a break. Its silly to think that all those millions and millions of people must be mistaken, because for ONE to be right about what they experienced (just one) it would go against your view on reality.
Avoid my argument with an insult to my intelligence, good thinking! though when people catch on to that it kinda makes you look stupid...you really had no idea at all what he was saying did you?
[video=youtube;9L2lDHNmRFw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9L2lDHNmRFw[/video]
If it's silly to think that, then you must be silly yourself. Millions of people believe in Jesus and make claims to have seen and experienced him. If just one of them is right, it would go against your view of reality.That video does nothing to disprove my words. Every single supernatural claim that was ever made falls under the categories this well spoken British guy presents? Gimme a break. Its silly to think that all those millions and millions of people must be mistaken, because for ONE to be right about what they experienced (just one) it would go against your view on reality.