Atheists

james76208

Member
I am and have always been non religious but a few years ago {not going into spooky story}i had a ghostly encounter and it shattered everything i knew
Just wandering if i wasn't alone
 

Chief Walkin Eagle

Well-Known Member
Your not alone man, the world is more crazy than you can imagine. If every aspect of reality all of the sudden appeared in front of you, you wouldnt believe it, if you did believe it than you might go crazy for a little bit trying to understand it but eventually you would calm down. I know this from experience.
 

overgrowem

Well-Known Member
It kinda hard to listen evidence such as crash sites being located across the world, if that evidence is kept secret. Is there anything that would distinguish this claim from fantasy?

Remote viewing would be extremely simple to demonstrate and prove. We simply place an object or a written note some place isolated and the viewer tells us what he sees. In fact, a number of magicians and skeptics do that very thing. They keep an object hidden in a safe place, and ask remote viewers to identify it. Several of them offer a reward for the correct answer, and there is always the JREF million dollar prize.

So considering that remote viewing would be extremely simple and very lucrative to test, no one has shown even the slightest ability. It would seem rather strange for this to be so if remote viewing were true............................................................................................Your lack of information on the U.S.remote viewing program is blinding.The locating of the crashed U.S.plane was widly reported when the program was declassified. Why do U say the crash is secret I didn't say so, and U don't know....Remote viewing HAS been tested(don't tell me U didn't know that).Some people consistently out perform random chance in controled tests.I hardly think a magicians performance is a valid test.
 

Chief Walkin Eagle

Well-Known Member
It kinda hard to listen evidence such as crash sites being located across the world, if that evidence is kept secret. Is there anything that would distinguish this claim from fantasy?

Remote viewing would be extremely simple to demonstrate and prove. We simply place an object or a written note some place isolated and the viewer tells us what he sees. In fact, a number of magicians and skeptics do that very thing. They keep an object hidden in a safe place, and ask remote viewers to identify it. Several of them offer a reward for the correct answer, and there is always the JREF million dollar prize.

So considering that remote viewing would be extremely simple and very lucrative to test, no one has shown even the slightest ability. It would seem rather strange for this to be so if remote viewing were true.......Your lack of information on the U.S.remote viewing program is blinding.The locating of the crashed U.S.plane was widly reported when the program was declassified. Why do U say the crash is secret I didn't say so, and U don't know....Remote viewing HAS been tested(don't tell me U didn'tknow that).Some people consistently out perform random chance in controled tests.I hardly think a magicians performance is a valid test.
Dude, dont even bother explaining anything, your just giving these guys an erection because they thrive on pointing out the "flaws" in what us "woo woo's" say.
 

Heisenberg

Well-Known Member
Your lack of information on the U.S.remote viewing program is blinding.The locating of the crashed U.S.plane was widly reported when the program was declassified. Why do U say the crash is secret I didn't say so, and U don't know....Remote viewing HAS been tested(don't tell me U didn'tknow that).Some people consistently out perform random chance in controled tests.I hardly think a magicians performance is a valid test.
You don't think placing an object in hiding and then asking the viewer to describe it is a valid test? What exactly did they do when they found the airplane? Was it not hidden somewhere and they were asked to see it?

As for the secret evidence, I am simply asking you to point to the reports you talk about. If it was widely reported, this should be an easy task. Also any controlled scientific test must be reported somewhere, link please?
 

Chief Walkin Eagle

Well-Known Member
so what would someone call an atheist that believes in ghost
Someone who believes in a higher power? If theres ghosts than theres spirits. There has to be something thats organizing these spirits, not that we are under its control, we are our own Gods, those who watch over us just have more experience, Im sure we'll be smoking blunts with Buddha one day as his equal.
 

james76208

Member
Your right. I'm hard core seeing is believing and dont try to put what i know on anyone or discredit anyones beliefs. I wish i could take everyone one and watch there faces when something like a ghost blows there mind lol wish i had mine
 

Chief Walkin Eagle

Well-Known Member
notice how you cannot speak against anything said in the video. if its wrong must be easy for you to disprove anything they have to say.

i'll just hold my breath for it
That video does nothing to disprove my words. Every single supernatural claim that was ever made falls under the categories this well spoken British guy presents? Gimme a break. Its silly to think that all those millions and millions of people must be mistaken, because for ONE to be right about what they experienced (just one) it would go against your view on reality.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
That video does nothing to disprove my words. Every single supernatural claim that was ever made falls under the categories this well spoken British guy presents? Gimme a break. Its silly to think that all those millions and millions of people must be mistaken, because for ONE to be right about what they experienced (just one) it would go against your view on reality.
you really had no idea at all what he was saying did you?
 

Heisenberg

Well-Known Member
That video does nothing to disprove my words. Every single supernatural claim that was ever made falls under the categories this well spoken British guy presents? Gimme a break. Its silly to think that all those millions and millions of people must be mistaken, because for ONE to be right about what they experienced (just one) it would go against your view on reality.
If it's silly to think that, then you must be silly yourself. Millions of people believe in Jesus and make claims to have seen and experienced him. If just one of them is right, it would go against your view of reality.
 
Top