trayvan martin

[UncleBuck]

While I agree there is no case against Zimmerman, I do not share your confidence that he will walk. Imagine a jury of 9,11,12? UncleButts. It would not be the first time justice has been denied by ideology.

see, you're as biased as most people here. you feel if the jury comes back with guilty, then justice has not been served.

yet, you don't even know all of the facts that are available, much less what's not available yet.

ya hack.

the only person i've seen reserving opinion is cannabineer. others claim not to be biased but their words tell a different tale.

 

[NoDrama]

So the admitedly poor investigation done on the scene is acceptable because, but the more complete investigation done after the fact is crap. again, we have to make quite a few leaps of faith to buy into the conspiracy. The original investigation was done with assumption of Martin being guilty, they (police) obviously didn't believe Martin was from the area. the second one was not.

this isn't about left and right, but there seems to be this blind defense of Zimmerman that is served with a side of "there tryin to take our guns" BS which this also isn't about.

I'm not anti gun and believe we have enough gun laws on our books on both sides of the argument, so I don't believe we need shoot first ask later laws to enhance a gun owners rights, I don't believe they should be allowed in bars or alchohol serving establishments. Do a little research on how we came to ban guns in bars, why the fuck would they be trying to change that?

It's no doubt a tragedy for both families but it's also abvious which family is suffering more.

Snore!!!!! We already went through all this before, in only 8% of the states can you legally take a CCW permit and take your gun in a bar, that's 4 states for those of you who are math deficient (8% of 50=4) ( there are 50 states, not the 57 Obama stated, oh and 1 more) and those laws have only just recently been changed. A non sequiter if there ever was one.

Where do you see this thread having a "they are trying to take our guns away " flavor? Site specific posts not just vomit out your opinion, we aren't interested in that.

I am sure a innocent man in prison would suffer far more than a memory.

 

[NoDrama]

it take someone to pull the trigger and man made guns so man can kill from a distance.

Quite right, I was being Facetious, I think it's fair to say I don't REALLY believe inanimate objects can develop malice aforethought.

 

[NoDrama]

others claim not to be biased but their words tell a different tale.

You were staring into the mirror when you said that part? yes?

 

[Red1966]

how so? i am pontificating on possibilities, unlike you, who is asserting as fact that things which can not be verified happened.

how so? i am pontificating on possibilities, unlike you, who is asserting as fact that things which can not be verified happened.

 

[UncleBuck]

You were staring into the mirror when you said that part? yes?

i fully admit that i am biased, i will be satisfied if this goes to trial though.

some people like to pretend they're not biased while pedaling a certain conclusion.

 

[UncleBuck]

how so? i am pontificating on possibilities, unlike you, who is asserting as fact that things which can not be verified happened.

i know you are but what am i?

i really hope you are older than 12 years old, doubtful though.

 

[UncleBuck]

*peddling

at least, i think

 

[Red1966]

see, you're as biased as most people here. you feel if the jury comes back with guilty, then justice has not been served. yet, you don't even know all of the facts that are available, much less what's not available yet. ya hack. the only person i've seen reserving opinion is cannabineer. others claim not to be biased but their words tell a different tale.

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!

 

[NoDrama]

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!

He admits to emulating Al Jolson once in a while.

 

[UncleBuck]

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!

i've already said that a trial to examine what happened is all it will take to satisfy me.

my gut tells me zimm is guilty of manslaughter at least, same conclusion serino reached and he gets paid to sniff out bullshit and has been doing it for years.

you won't be satisfied, however unless no trial happens or zimm walks. bit of a difference.

 

[NoDrama]

*peddling

at least, i think

Yeah its peddling when you are trying to sell something and pedaling when you are riding a bicycle.

 

[NoDrama]

and he gets paid to sniff out bullshit and has been doing it for years.

Appeal to Authority, Serino's gut sense is not infallible. Can you even find one single shred of evidence where his "BS o' Meter" was correct on another case?

 

[UncleBuck]

Yeah its peddling when you are trying to sell something and pedaling when you are riding a bicycle.

it just seemed wrong when i wrote it.

 

[UncleBuck]

Appeal to Authority, Serino's gut sense is not infallible.

it sure isn't, but he is the one that had the most exclusive interview anyone will ever get, not to mention he's a professional rather than an internet speculator.

 

[Red1966]

i know you are but what am i? i really hope you are older than 12 years old, doubtful though.

First I'm an "old coot", now I'm 12? You funny

 

[NoDrama]

it just seemed wrong when i wrote it.

Its probably that way for Effect and Affect for you too, no matter what you put there it just leaves you with a feeling of doubt.

 

[NoDrama]

it sure isn't, but he is the one that had the most exclusive interview anyone will ever get, not to mention he's a professional rather than an internet speculator.

Yeah, he did a initial on site interview, then let a couple hours go by and then did a 3 hour interrogation. Story never changed one detail.

 

[UncleBuck]

Yeah, he did a initial on site interview, then let a couple hours go by and then did a 3 hour interrogation. Story never changed one detail.

so you've got access to zimmerman's stories?

i guess you must be working the case, because no one else does. it's blacked out last i checked.

 

[Red1966]

Yeah, he did a initial on site interview, then let a couple hours go by and then did a 3 hour interrogation. Story never changed one detail.

Who is Serino?