No misleading questions. And all I asked, is how CAN the law as written, be implemented. I don't know how it can..way to..not there. Really no plan written into the law.
But you assure us it can be implemented...pray tell how?
The Act lays out the path to implementation through the RULES crafted by the MDCH.
We don't need laws for clarification - we need dialog and a seat at the table in an open forum at the DEPT.
The Legislature can require a Finding of Fact on whatever they want to know about the law from the AG.
He has to respond to them, and once he does, his ruling is used as a basis of fact until or unless the Court overrules his interpretation of Law.
The activists have been terrified of confronting the State in this manner because it would screw up their other agendas.
I hit Greg and Co. with this in '09.
I hit CPU with it. They all understood how to actually get some relief and chose not to go down that path.
At that time AG Cox was the guy to rule, and he has since shown he would ruled correctly for the people.
So they were terrified of the wrong guy. Too bad they didn't use tact to talk to the guy instead of what they did do...
It matters not now - except that he would be the best legal advice one could get about implementing this Act fairly.
And he is now in private practice in Livonia area from what I've read in the paper.
If any of you fuckers who purport to care about this Act and it's Intent want to force Full Implementation:
then you must have the balls to face the current AG down in Court.
It will dry up the bullshit cases 'pot' lawyers like to make a living and websites off of.
It will spell out in no uncertain terms that Dispensaries are not covered!
See - that's WHY the law has not been fully implemented - no one really cares about the truth of it that is 'representing' the interests of the Law.
[video=youtube;ZqmC1T9rukk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=ZqmC1T9rukk[/video]